土地覆被和保护区对飞虫多样性的影响

IF 5.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Conservation Biology Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1111/cobi.14425
James S Sinclair, Dominik Buchner, Mark O Gessner, Jörg Müller, Steffen U Pauls, Stefan Stoll, Ellen A R Welti, Claus Bässler, Jörn Buse, Frank Dziock, Julian Enss, Thomas Hörren, Robert Künast, Yuanheng Li, Andreas Marten, Carsten Morkel, Ronny Richter, Sebastian Seibold, Martin Sorg, Sönke Twietmeyer, Dirk Weis, Wolfgang Weisser, Benedikt Wiggering, Martin Wilmking, Gerhard Zotz, Mark Frenzel, Florian Leese, Peter Haase
{"title":"土地覆被和保护区对飞虫多样性的影响","authors":"James S Sinclair, Dominik Buchner, Mark O Gessner, Jörg Müller, Steffen U Pauls, Stefan Stoll, Ellen A R Welti, Claus Bässler, Jörn Buse, Frank Dziock, Julian Enss, Thomas Hörren, Robert Künast, Yuanheng Li, Andreas Marten, Carsten Morkel, Ronny Richter, Sebastian Seibold, Martin Sorg, Sönke Twietmeyer, Dirk Weis, Wolfgang Weisser, Benedikt Wiggering, Martin Wilmking, Gerhard Zotz, Mark Frenzel, Florian Leese, Peter Haase","doi":"10.1111/cobi.14425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Widespread insect losses are a critical global problem. Mitigating this problem requires identifying the principal drivers across different taxa and determining which insects are covered by protected areas. However, doing so is hindered by missing information on most species owing to extremely high insect diversity and difficulties in morphological identification. To address this knowledge gap, we used one of the most comprehensive insect DNA metabarcoding data sets assembled (encompassing 31,846 flying insect species) in which data were collected from a network of 75 Malaise traps distributed across Germany. Collection sites encompass gradients of land cover, weather, and climate, along with differences in site protection status, which allowed us to gain broader insights into how insects respond to these factors. We examined changes in total insect biomass, species richness, temporal turnover, and shifts in the composition of taxa, key functional groups (pollinators, threatened species, and invasive species), and feeding traits. Lower insect biomass generally equated to lower richness of all insects and higher temporal turnover, suggesting that biomass loss translates to biodiversity loss and less stable communities. Spatial variability in insect biomass and composition was primarily driven by land cover, rather than weather or climate change. As vegetation and land-cover heterogeneity increased, insect biomass increased by 50% in 2019 and 56% in 2020 and total species richness by 58% and 33%, respectively. Similarly, areas with low-vegetation habitats exhibited the highest richness of key taxa, including pollinators and threatened species, and the widest variety of feeding traits. However, these habitats tended to be less protected despite their higher diversity. Our results highlight the value of heterogeneous low vegetation for promoting overall insect biomass and diversity and that better protection of insects requires improved protection and management of unforested areas, where many biodiversity hotspots and key taxa occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":" ","pages":"e14425"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of land cover and protected areas on flying insect diversity.\",\"authors\":\"James S Sinclair, Dominik Buchner, Mark O Gessner, Jörg Müller, Steffen U Pauls, Stefan Stoll, Ellen A R Welti, Claus Bässler, Jörn Buse, Frank Dziock, Julian Enss, Thomas Hörren, Robert Künast, Yuanheng Li, Andreas Marten, Carsten Morkel, Ronny Richter, Sebastian Seibold, Martin Sorg, Sönke Twietmeyer, Dirk Weis, Wolfgang Weisser, Benedikt Wiggering, Martin Wilmking, Gerhard Zotz, Mark Frenzel, Florian Leese, Peter Haase\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cobi.14425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Widespread insect losses are a critical global problem. Mitigating this problem requires identifying the principal drivers across different taxa and determining which insects are covered by protected areas. However, doing so is hindered by missing information on most species owing to extremely high insect diversity and difficulties in morphological identification. To address this knowledge gap, we used one of the most comprehensive insect DNA metabarcoding data sets assembled (encompassing 31,846 flying insect species) in which data were collected from a network of 75 Malaise traps distributed across Germany. Collection sites encompass gradients of land cover, weather, and climate, along with differences in site protection status, which allowed us to gain broader insights into how insects respond to these factors. We examined changes in total insect biomass, species richness, temporal turnover, and shifts in the composition of taxa, key functional groups (pollinators, threatened species, and invasive species), and feeding traits. Lower insect biomass generally equated to lower richness of all insects and higher temporal turnover, suggesting that biomass loss translates to biodiversity loss and less stable communities. Spatial variability in insect biomass and composition was primarily driven by land cover, rather than weather or climate change. As vegetation and land-cover heterogeneity increased, insect biomass increased by 50% in 2019 and 56% in 2020 and total species richness by 58% and 33%, respectively. Similarly, areas with low-vegetation habitats exhibited the highest richness of key taxa, including pollinators and threatened species, and the widest variety of feeding traits. However, these habitats tended to be less protected despite their higher diversity. Our results highlight the value of heterogeneous low vegetation for promoting overall insect biomass and diversity and that better protection of insects requires improved protection and management of unforested areas, where many biodiversity hotspots and key taxa occur.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14425\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

广泛的昆虫损失是一个严重的全球性问题。缓解这一问题需要确定不同分类群之间的主要驱动因素,并确定哪些昆虫被保护区域所覆盖。然而,由于昆虫多样性极高和形态鉴定困难,大多数物种的信息缺失阻碍了这一工作。为了解决这一知识差距,我们使用了最全面的昆虫DNA元条形码数据集之一(包括31,846种飞虫),其中的数据来自分布在德国各地的75个不适陷阱网络。收集地点包括土地覆盖、天气和气候的梯度,以及地点保护状况的差异,这使我们能够更广泛地了解昆虫如何对这些因素做出反应。我们研究了昆虫总生物量、物种丰富度、时间更替、分类群组成、关键功能群(传粉者、濒危物种和入侵物种)和取食性状的变化。较低的昆虫生物量通常等同于较低的所有昆虫丰富度和较高的时间周转,表明生物量损失转化为生物多样性丧失和更不稳定的群落。昆虫生物量和组成的空间变异主要受土地覆盖驱动,而非天气或气候变化。随着植被和土地覆盖异质性的增加,2019年和2020年昆虫生物量分别增加了50%和56%,总物种丰富度分别增加了58%和33%。同样,低植被生境地区的关键分类群(包括传粉媒介和受威胁物种)的丰富度最高,取食性状的多样性也最广。然而,尽管这些栖息地具有较高的多样性,但它们往往受到较少的保护。我们的研究结果强调了异质性低植被对促进昆虫整体生物量和多样性的价值,并且更好地保护昆虫需要改进对非森林地区的保护和管理,这些地区有许多生物多样性热点和关键分类群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of land cover and protected areas on flying insect diversity.

Widespread insect losses are a critical global problem. Mitigating this problem requires identifying the principal drivers across different taxa and determining which insects are covered by protected areas. However, doing so is hindered by missing information on most species owing to extremely high insect diversity and difficulties in morphological identification. To address this knowledge gap, we used one of the most comprehensive insect DNA metabarcoding data sets assembled (encompassing 31,846 flying insect species) in which data were collected from a network of 75 Malaise traps distributed across Germany. Collection sites encompass gradients of land cover, weather, and climate, along with differences in site protection status, which allowed us to gain broader insights into how insects respond to these factors. We examined changes in total insect biomass, species richness, temporal turnover, and shifts in the composition of taxa, key functional groups (pollinators, threatened species, and invasive species), and feeding traits. Lower insect biomass generally equated to lower richness of all insects and higher temporal turnover, suggesting that biomass loss translates to biodiversity loss and less stable communities. Spatial variability in insect biomass and composition was primarily driven by land cover, rather than weather or climate change. As vegetation and land-cover heterogeneity increased, insect biomass increased by 50% in 2019 and 56% in 2020 and total species richness by 58% and 33%, respectively. Similarly, areas with low-vegetation habitats exhibited the highest richness of key taxa, including pollinators and threatened species, and the widest variety of feeding traits. However, these habitats tended to be less protected despite their higher diversity. Our results highlight the value of heterogeneous low vegetation for promoting overall insect biomass and diversity and that better protection of insects requires improved protection and management of unforested areas, where many biodiversity hotspots and key taxa occur.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
期刊最新文献
Potential for synergistic conservation through area-based strategies. Avoiding an impending collision in international conservation. Taxonomic and phylogenetic biases in translocated angiosperm plant species across European countries. Issue Information Coexisting with large carnivores based on the Volterra principle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1