{"title":"如何降低边缘型人格障碍患者治疗的风险。","authors":"Richard G Hersh","doi":"10.1007/s11920-024-01558-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Clinicians treating patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience concerns about risk for adverse events that can lead to litigation or complaints to administrative boards. This paper's goal is to outline steps to ensure the safety of both the patient and clinician.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Review of available data confirms that psychiatry is a subspeciality with relatively low risk for malpractice litigation, but high risk for complaints to administrative agencies. Examination of litigation and complaints suggests that familiar challenges in work with patients with BPD are frequently cited. Risk management considerations have been impacted in recent years by changes in psychiatric training, health care delivery, and regulations about patient information transparency. Concurrently, empirically validated treatments for BPD have been refined and disseminated. Clinicians can address safety concerns by adapting established risk management guidance with an appreciation of key elements of BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11057,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Reports","volume":" ","pages":"816-821"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Mitigate Risk in the Treatment of Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Richard G Hersh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11920-024-01558-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Clinicians treating patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience concerns about risk for adverse events that can lead to litigation or complaints to administrative boards. This paper's goal is to outline steps to ensure the safety of both the patient and clinician.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Review of available data confirms that psychiatry is a subspeciality with relatively low risk for malpractice litigation, but high risk for complaints to administrative agencies. Examination of litigation and complaints suggests that familiar challenges in work with patients with BPD are frequently cited. Risk management considerations have been impacted in recent years by changes in psychiatric training, health care delivery, and regulations about patient information transparency. Concurrently, empirically validated treatments for BPD have been refined and disseminated. Clinicians can address safety concerns by adapting established risk management guidance with an appreciation of key elements of BPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Psychiatry Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"816-821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Psychiatry Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01558-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01558-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How to Mitigate Risk in the Treatment of Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder.
Purpose of review: Clinicians treating patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience concerns about risk for adverse events that can lead to litigation or complaints to administrative boards. This paper's goal is to outline steps to ensure the safety of both the patient and clinician.
Recent findings: Review of available data confirms that psychiatry is a subspeciality with relatively low risk for malpractice litigation, but high risk for complaints to administrative agencies. Examination of litigation and complaints suggests that familiar challenges in work with patients with BPD are frequently cited. Risk management considerations have been impacted in recent years by changes in psychiatric training, health care delivery, and regulations about patient information transparency. Concurrently, empirically validated treatments for BPD have been refined and disseminated. Clinicians can address safety concerns by adapting established risk management guidance with an appreciation of key elements of BPD.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in psychiatry. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by psychiatric disorders.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anxiety, medicopsychiatric disorders, and schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.