零售商对采用学校周边外卖管理区公众咨询的回应:一项纵向定性分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Health Policy and Management Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.8294
Matthew Keeble, Michael Chang, Daniel Derbyshire, Martin White, Jean Adams, Ben Amies-Cull, Steven Cummins, Suzan Hassan, Bochu Liu, Antonieta Medina-Lara, Oliver Mytton, Tarra L Penney, John Rahilly, Nina Rogers, Bea Savory, Annie Schiff, Richard Smith, Claire Thompson, Thomas Burgoine
{"title":"零售商对采用学校周边外卖管理区公众咨询的回应:一项纵向定性分析。","authors":"Matthew Keeble, Michael Chang, Daniel Derbyshire, Martin White, Jean Adams, Ben Amies-Cull, Steven Cummins, Suzan Hassan, Bochu Liu, Antonieta Medina-Lara, Oliver Mytton, Tarra L Penney, John Rahilly, Nina Rogers, Bea Savory, Annie Schiff, Richard Smith, Claire Thompson, Thomas Burgoine","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.8294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Takeaway food is often high in calories and served in portion sizes that exceed public health recommendations for fat, salt and sugar. This food is widely accessible in the neighbourhood food environment. As of 2019, of all local authorities in England (n=325), 41 had adopted urban planning interventions that can allow them to manage the opening of new takeaway outlets in \"takeaway management zones around schools\" (known elsewhere as \"exclusion zones\"). Before adoption, local authorities undertake mandatory public consultation where responses objecting to proposals can be submitted. Evidence on common objections could be insightful for practitioners and policy-makers considering this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 41 local authorities that adopted a takeaway management zone around schools between 2009 and 2019. We identified and analysed objections to proposals submitted by or on behalf of food retailers and local authority responses to these. We used reflexive thematic analysis with a commercial determinants of health lens to generate themes, and investigated if and how objections and responses changed over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We generated four themes: The role of takeaways in obesity, Takeaway management zone adoption, Use and interpretation of evidence, and managing external opinions. Despite not being implicated by the adoption of takeaway management zones around schools, planning consultants objected to proposals on behalf of transnational food retailers, however, independent takeaways did not respond. Objections attempted to determine the causes of poor diet and obesity, suggest alternative interventions to address them, undermine evidence justifying proposals, and influence perspectives about local authorities and their intervention. Objections consistently raised the same arguments, but over time became less explicit and expressed a willingness to partner with local authorities to develop alternative solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Objections to local authority proposals to adopt an urban planning intervention that can stop new takeaways opening near schools featured strategies used by other industries to delay or prevent population health intervention adoption. Practitioners and policy-makers can use our findings when developing proposals for new takeaway management zones around schools. By using knowledge about their local context and addressing arguments against specific aspects of the intervention, they can pre-empt common objections.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":"13 ","pages":"8294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retailer Responses to Public Consultations on the Adoption of Takeaway Management Zones Around Schools: A Longitudinal Qualitative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Keeble, Michael Chang, Daniel Derbyshire, Martin White, Jean Adams, Ben Amies-Cull, Steven Cummins, Suzan Hassan, Bochu Liu, Antonieta Medina-Lara, Oliver Mytton, Tarra L Penney, John Rahilly, Nina Rogers, Bea Savory, Annie Schiff, Richard Smith, Claire Thompson, Thomas Burgoine\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ijhpm.8294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Takeaway food is often high in calories and served in portion sizes that exceed public health recommendations for fat, salt and sugar. This food is widely accessible in the neighbourhood food environment. As of 2019, of all local authorities in England (n=325), 41 had adopted urban planning interventions that can allow them to manage the opening of new takeaway outlets in \\\"takeaway management zones around schools\\\" (known elsewhere as \\\"exclusion zones\\\"). Before adoption, local authorities undertake mandatory public consultation where responses objecting to proposals can be submitted. Evidence on common objections could be insightful for practitioners and policy-makers considering this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 41 local authorities that adopted a takeaway management zone around schools between 2009 and 2019. We identified and analysed objections to proposals submitted by or on behalf of food retailers and local authority responses to these. We used reflexive thematic analysis with a commercial determinants of health lens to generate themes, and investigated if and how objections and responses changed over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We generated four themes: The role of takeaways in obesity, Takeaway management zone adoption, Use and interpretation of evidence, and managing external opinions. Despite not being implicated by the adoption of takeaway management zones around schools, planning consultants objected to proposals on behalf of transnational food retailers, however, independent takeaways did not respond. Objections attempted to determine the causes of poor diet and obesity, suggest alternative interventions to address them, undermine evidence justifying proposals, and influence perspectives about local authorities and their intervention. Objections consistently raised the same arguments, but over time became less explicit and expressed a willingness to partner with local authorities to develop alternative solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Objections to local authority proposals to adopt an urban planning intervention that can stop new takeaways opening near schools featured strategies used by other industries to delay or prevent population health intervention adoption. Practitioners and policy-makers can use our findings when developing proposals for new takeaway management zones around schools. By using knowledge about their local context and addressing arguments against specific aspects of the intervention, they can pre-empt common objections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"8294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496767/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8294\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外卖食品通常热量高,份量超过公共健康建议的脂肪、盐和糖含量。这种食物在邻里食物环境中随处可见。截至2019年,在英格兰所有地方当局(n=325)中,41个地方当局采取了城市规划干预措施,使他们能够管理在“学校周围的外卖管理区”(在其他地方被称为“禁区”)开设新的外卖店。在通过之前,地方当局进行强制性的公众咨询,可以提交反对提案的答复。对于考虑这种干预措施的从业者和政策制定者来说,常见反对意见的证据可能是有见地的。方法:我们纳入了2009年至2019年期间在学校周围建立外卖管理区的41个地方政府。我们确定并分析了对食品零售商或代表食品零售商提交的提案的反对意见和地方当局对此的回应。我们使用反身性主题分析和健康的商业决定因素来生成主题,并调查反对意见和反应是否以及如何随时间而变化。结果:我们产生了四个主题:外卖在肥胖中的作用,外卖管理区采用,证据的使用和解释,以及管理外部意见。尽管没有涉及到学校周围采用外卖管理区,但规划顾问代表跨国食品零售商反对提议,然而,独立外卖没有回应。反对意见试图确定不良饮食和肥胖的原因,提出解决这些问题的替代干预措施,破坏证明建议合理的证据,并影响对地方当局及其干预措施的看法。反对意见一直提出同样的论点,但随着时间的推移,反对意见变得不那么明确,并表达了与地方当局合作制定替代解决方案的意愿。结论:反对地方当局建议采取城市规划干预措施,以阻止学校附近开设新的外卖店,这是其他行业用来推迟或阻止人口健康干预措施采用的特色策略。从业者和政策制定者可以在制定学校周围新的外卖管理区的建议时使用我们的研究结果。通过利用对当地环境的了解,并针对干预措施的具体方面提出反对意见,他们可以先发制人地反对常见的反对意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retailer Responses to Public Consultations on the Adoption of Takeaway Management Zones Around Schools: A Longitudinal Qualitative Analysis.

Background: Takeaway food is often high in calories and served in portion sizes that exceed public health recommendations for fat, salt and sugar. This food is widely accessible in the neighbourhood food environment. As of 2019, of all local authorities in England (n=325), 41 had adopted urban planning interventions that can allow them to manage the opening of new takeaway outlets in "takeaway management zones around schools" (known elsewhere as "exclusion zones"). Before adoption, local authorities undertake mandatory public consultation where responses objecting to proposals can be submitted. Evidence on common objections could be insightful for practitioners and policy-makers considering this intervention.

Methods: We included 41 local authorities that adopted a takeaway management zone around schools between 2009 and 2019. We identified and analysed objections to proposals submitted by or on behalf of food retailers and local authority responses to these. We used reflexive thematic analysis with a commercial determinants of health lens to generate themes, and investigated if and how objections and responses changed over time.

Results: We generated four themes: The role of takeaways in obesity, Takeaway management zone adoption, Use and interpretation of evidence, and managing external opinions. Despite not being implicated by the adoption of takeaway management zones around schools, planning consultants objected to proposals on behalf of transnational food retailers, however, independent takeaways did not respond. Objections attempted to determine the causes of poor diet and obesity, suggest alternative interventions to address them, undermine evidence justifying proposals, and influence perspectives about local authorities and their intervention. Objections consistently raised the same arguments, but over time became less explicit and expressed a willingness to partner with local authorities to develop alternative solutions.

Conclusion: Objections to local authority proposals to adopt an urban planning intervention that can stop new takeaways opening near schools featured strategies used by other industries to delay or prevent population health intervention adoption. Practitioners and policy-makers can use our findings when developing proposals for new takeaway management zones around schools. By using knowledge about their local context and addressing arguments against specific aspects of the intervention, they can pre-empt common objections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Research Coproduction in Uganda Comment on "Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact". How Does Management Matter for Hospital Performance? Evidence From the Global Hospital Management Survey in China. Impact of the Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Payment Reform on Provider Behavior in China: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Study. Identifying Positive Practices to Institutionalize Social Innovation in the Malawian Health System. Coopetition Strategy in the Healthcare: Good or Bad?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1