LC-MS临床检测乳腺癌患者血浆内分泌治疗CDK4/6抑制剂的三种制样方法:交叉验证(红色)、生态(绿色)和经济(蓝色)评估。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116586
Lu Turković , Zvonimir Mlinarić , Mila Lovrić , Tajana Silovski , Biljana Nigović , Miranda Sertić
{"title":"LC-MS临床检测乳腺癌患者血浆内分泌治疗CDK4/6抑制剂的三种制样方法:交叉验证(红色)、生态(绿色)和经济(蓝色)评估。","authors":"Lu Turković ,&nbsp;Zvonimir Mlinarić ,&nbsp;Mila Lovrić ,&nbsp;Tajana Silovski ,&nbsp;Biljana Nigović ,&nbsp;Miranda Sertić","doi":"10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cyclin D-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, in combination with aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole or oestrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant, are being assessed as candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring. An ideal bioanalytical method for their determination in patient plasma samples is therefore of high interest, as there is no routine reference method yet available in the clinical practice. In this work, three sample preparation approaches – dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and newly developed phospholipid removal (PLR) for LC-MS determination of these six drugs are comprehensively assessed. The methods are validated in the clinically relevant linear ranges with remarkable precision (RSD ≤6.9 %) and accuracy (bias −13.6 – 11.8 %). To compare the procedures in a real-world setting, they are applied on 38 samples from breast cancer patients. The differences between paired results are below 20 % for more than 92 % of the repeats and the RSD is ≤13.1 % between the corresponding results. Statistical comparison of the results reveals excellent overall agreement between the methods (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient ≥0.9969, maximal Bland-Altman bias 6.3 %). DLLME proved to be the most ecologically acceptable method due to the high degree of miniaturisation (AGREEprep score 0.44), PLR enabled very high sample throughput and cost-effectiveness (BAGI 72.5), while SPE showed the best analytical performance (redness score 100). All three methods are suitable for their designated purpose, and the choice of the ideal method can be made based on the scope of application, available funds and equipment and desired ecological footprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 116586"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three sample preparation methods for clinical determination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy in breast cancer patient plasma using LC-MS: Cross-validation (red), ecological (green) and economical (blue) assessment\",\"authors\":\"Lu Turković ,&nbsp;Zvonimir Mlinarić ,&nbsp;Mila Lovrić ,&nbsp;Tajana Silovski ,&nbsp;Biljana Nigović ,&nbsp;Miranda Sertić\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cyclin D-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, in combination with aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole or oestrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant, are being assessed as candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring. An ideal bioanalytical method for their determination in patient plasma samples is therefore of high interest, as there is no routine reference method yet available in the clinical practice. In this work, three sample preparation approaches – dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and newly developed phospholipid removal (PLR) for LC-MS determination of these six drugs are comprehensively assessed. The methods are validated in the clinically relevant linear ranges with remarkable precision (RSD ≤6.9 %) and accuracy (bias −13.6 – 11.8 %). To compare the procedures in a real-world setting, they are applied on 38 samples from breast cancer patients. The differences between paired results are below 20 % for more than 92 % of the repeats and the RSD is ≤13.1 % between the corresponding results. Statistical comparison of the results reveals excellent overall agreement between the methods (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient ≥0.9969, maximal Bland-Altman bias 6.3 %). DLLME proved to be the most ecologically acceptable method due to the high degree of miniaturisation (AGREEprep score 0.44), PLR enabled very high sample throughput and cost-effectiveness (BAGI 72.5), while SPE showed the best analytical performance (redness score 100). All three methods are suitable for their designated purpose, and the choice of the ideal method can be made based on the scope of application, available funds and equipment and desired ecological footprint.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis\",\"volume\":\"255 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0731708524006289\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0731708524006289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Cyclin d依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂palbociclib, ribociclib和abemaciclib,与芳香酶抑制剂阿那曲唑和来曲唑或雌激素受体降解剂氟维司汀联合使用,正在被评估为治疗药物监测的候选药物。因此,在患者血浆样品中测定其理想的生物分析方法引起了高度关注,因为在临床实践中尚无常规参考方法。本研究对分散液液微萃取法(DLLME)、固相萃取法(SPE)和新开发的磷脂去除法(PLR)三种样品制备方法进行了综合评价。该方法在临床相关的线性范围内得到验证,精密度(RSD≤6.9 %)和准确度(偏倚-13.6 - 11.8 %)显著。为了在现实环境中比较这两种方法,研究人员将它们应用于38名乳腺癌患者的样本。对于超过92 %的重复序列,配对结果之间的差异小于20 %,对应结果之间的RSD≤13.1 %。统计比较结果显示,两种方法的总体一致性很好(Lin’s一致性相关系数≥0.9969,最大Bland-Altman偏倚为6.3 %)。由于高度小型化(AGREEprep评分0.44),DLLME被证明是最生态可接受的方法,PLR具有非常高的样品通量和成本效益(BAGI 72.5),而SPE表现出最佳的分析性能(红度评分100)。这三种方法都适合其指定的用途,可以根据应用范围、可用资金和设备以及期望的生态足迹来选择理想的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three sample preparation methods for clinical determination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy in breast cancer patient plasma using LC-MS: Cross-validation (red), ecological (green) and economical (blue) assessment
Cyclin D-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, in combination with aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole or oestrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant, are being assessed as candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring. An ideal bioanalytical method for their determination in patient plasma samples is therefore of high interest, as there is no routine reference method yet available in the clinical practice. In this work, three sample preparation approaches – dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and newly developed phospholipid removal (PLR) for LC-MS determination of these six drugs are comprehensively assessed. The methods are validated in the clinically relevant linear ranges with remarkable precision (RSD ≤6.9 %) and accuracy (bias −13.6 – 11.8 %). To compare the procedures in a real-world setting, they are applied on 38 samples from breast cancer patients. The differences between paired results are below 20 % for more than 92 % of the repeats and the RSD is ≤13.1 % between the corresponding results. Statistical comparison of the results reveals excellent overall agreement between the methods (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient ≥0.9969, maximal Bland-Altman bias 6.3 %). DLLME proved to be the most ecologically acceptable method due to the high degree of miniaturisation (AGREEprep score 0.44), PLR enabled very high sample throughput and cost-effectiveness (BAGI 72.5), while SPE showed the best analytical performance (redness score 100). All three methods are suitable for their designated purpose, and the choice of the ideal method can be made based on the scope of application, available funds and equipment and desired ecological footprint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
588
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: This journal is an international medium directed towards the needs of academic, clinical, government and industrial analysis by publishing original research reports and critical reviews on pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. It covers the interdisciplinary aspects of analysis in the pharmaceutical, biomedical and clinical sciences, including developments in analytical methodology, instrumentation, computation and interpretation. Submissions on novel applications focusing on drug purity and stability studies, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic monitoring, metabolic profiling; drug-related aspects of analytical biochemistry and forensic toxicology; quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry are also welcome. Studies from areas of well established and poorly selective methods, such as UV-VIS spectrophotometry (including derivative and multi-wavelength measurements), basic electroanalytical (potentiometric, polarographic and voltammetric) methods, fluorimetry, flow-injection analysis, etc. are accepted for publication in exceptional cases only, if a unique and substantial advantage over presently known systems is demonstrated. The same applies to the assay of simple drug formulations by any kind of methods and the determination of drugs in biological samples based merely on spiked samples. Drug purity/stability studies should contain information on the structure elucidation of the impurities/degradants.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Exploring the mechanism of action of Bailemian capsule in the treatment of insomnia based on metabolomics, 16S rRNA with UPLC-QE-Orbitrap-MS/MS Exploring the mechanisms of Yinchenhao decoction against ANIT-induced cholestatic liver injury by lipidomics, metabolomics and network pharmacology Characterization of trimethylamine metabolic pathways using pseudo-targeted metabolomics Identification of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases involved in I3,II8-biapigenin glucuronidation in Vitro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1