Sebastián Gil-Tamayo, Cándida Díaz-Brochero, Julio Solano, Óscar Contreras, Laura Arenas, Sandra García, Óscar M Muñoz-Velandia
{"title":"SAPS 3用于预测需要ICU管理的血液恶性肿瘤患者住院死亡率的验证","authors":"Sebastián Gil-Tamayo, Cándida Díaz-Brochero, Julio Solano, Óscar Contreras, Laura Arenas, Sandra García, Óscar M Muñoz-Velandia","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2024.2423251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prognostic systems predicting death risk may vary for patients with haematological malignancies needing ICU care. This study externally validated SAPS 3 using a retrospective cohort of adults with these conditions in the ICU. The score was calculated at admission using the general and South America-adjusted formulas. Mortality discrimination was assessed <i>via</i> AUC-ROC, and calibration by Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit and graphical analysis with a calibration belt. The analysis included 273 admissions, with 119 deaths. Discriminative capacity was low (AUC-ROC 0.56, CI 95% 0.49-0.63). There was a poor correlation between expected and observed events across all risk deciles (Hosmer-Lemeshow 10.45, <i>p</i> = 0.0635). Similar results were found with the South America-adjusted formula. SAPS 3 does not effectively discriminate between survivors and non-survivors, underestimating risk in low-risk groups and overestimating it in high-risk groups. Mortality risk estimation in this scenario should rely on clinical judgment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"451-457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of SAPS 3 for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with haematological malignancy requiring ICU management.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastián Gil-Tamayo, Cándida Díaz-Brochero, Julio Solano, Óscar Contreras, Laura Arenas, Sandra García, Óscar M Muñoz-Velandia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428194.2024.2423251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prognostic systems predicting death risk may vary for patients with haematological malignancies needing ICU care. This study externally validated SAPS 3 using a retrospective cohort of adults with these conditions in the ICU. The score was calculated at admission using the general and South America-adjusted formulas. Mortality discrimination was assessed <i>via</i> AUC-ROC, and calibration by Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit and graphical analysis with a calibration belt. The analysis included 273 admissions, with 119 deaths. Discriminative capacity was low (AUC-ROC 0.56, CI 95% 0.49-0.63). There was a poor correlation between expected and observed events across all risk deciles (Hosmer-Lemeshow 10.45, <i>p</i> = 0.0635). Similar results were found with the South America-adjusted formula. SAPS 3 does not effectively discriminate between survivors and non-survivors, underestimating risk in low-risk groups and overestimating it in high-risk groups. Mortality risk estimation in this scenario should rely on clinical judgment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"451-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2423251\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2423251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对于需要ICU护理的血液恶性肿瘤患者,预测死亡风险的预后系统可能有所不同。本研究通过对ICU中患有这些疾病的成人进行回顾性队列研究,从外部验证了SAPS 3。该分数是在入学时使用通用公式和南美调整公式计算的。采用AUC-ROC评估死亡率差异,采用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度和校正带图形分析进行校正。该分析包括273例入院,其中119例死亡。鉴别能力低(AUC-ROC 0.56, CI 95% 0.49-0.63)。在所有风险十分位数中,预期和观察到的事件之间的相关性很差(Hosmer-Lemeshow 10.45, p = 0.0635)。南美洲调整后的公式也得出了类似的结果。SAPS 3不能有效区分幸存者和非幸存者,低估了低风险组的风险,高估了高风险组的风险。这种情况下的死亡风险估计应依赖于临床判断。
Validation of SAPS 3 for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with haematological malignancy requiring ICU management.
Prognostic systems predicting death risk may vary for patients with haematological malignancies needing ICU care. This study externally validated SAPS 3 using a retrospective cohort of adults with these conditions in the ICU. The score was calculated at admission using the general and South America-adjusted formulas. Mortality discrimination was assessed via AUC-ROC, and calibration by Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit and graphical analysis with a calibration belt. The analysis included 273 admissions, with 119 deaths. Discriminative capacity was low (AUC-ROC 0.56, CI 95% 0.49-0.63). There was a poor correlation between expected and observed events across all risk deciles (Hosmer-Lemeshow 10.45, p = 0.0635). Similar results were found with the South America-adjusted formula. SAPS 3 does not effectively discriminate between survivors and non-survivors, underestimating risk in low-risk groups and overestimating it in high-risk groups. Mortality risk estimation in this scenario should rely on clinical judgment.
期刊介绍:
Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor