新一代光学跟踪机器人立体定向与术中计算机断层扫描的神经肿瘤学应用:试点经验。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical focus Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24532
Carlin Chuck, Rohaid Ali, Christine K Lee, Athar N Malik, Konstantina A Svokos, Deus Cielo, Curtis E Doberstein, Harry J Rosenberg, Jerrold L Boxerman, Joseph Rajasekaran, Wael F Asaad, Ziya Gokaslan, Prakash Sampath, Clark C Chen
{"title":"新一代光学跟踪机器人立体定向与术中计算机断层扫描的神经肿瘤学应用:试点经验。","authors":"Carlin Chuck, Rohaid Ali, Christine K Lee, Athar N Malik, Konstantina A Svokos, Deus Cielo, Curtis E Doberstein, Harry J Rosenberg, Jerrold L Boxerman, Joseph Rajasekaran, Wael F Asaad, Ziya Gokaslan, Prakash Sampath, Clark C Chen","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Innovations in robotics continue to reshape the landscape of neurosurgery. Here, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ExcelsiusGPS robot in the treatment of neuro-oncological, intracranial lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 19 consecutive adult patients with a neuro-oncological diagnosis who underwent intracranial biopsy and/or laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with the assistance of the ExcelsiusGPS robot and intraoperative CT. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record and the robot software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 19 patients harbored lesions that were deep seated, involving the eloquent cortex, or subcentimeter. Definitive tissue diagnosis was achieved in all cases involving stereotactic biopsy (n = 16), with glioblastoma as the most common diagnosis. The mean ± SD time for setting up the robotic stereotaxis system was 57.4 ± 10.7 minutes. The mean procedural time after that was 71.6 ± 41.0 minutes for stereotactic needle biopsy and 188.4 ± 61.2 minutes for procedures involving LITT. The mean radial errors of the actual trajectory relative to the planned trajectory at the entry and target points were 0.625 ± 0.443 mm and 0.745 ± 0.472 mm, respectively. There were no procedural complications or new postoperative deficits, although routine postoperative CT showed new hyperdensity at the target site in 3/19 patients (15.7%). All patients who underwent elective procedures were discharged by postoperative day 3 (mean 1.38 ± 0.619 days). There were two 30-day readmissions (pulmonary embolus and general weakness), and neither was attributable to the surgical procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors' pilot experience with the ExcelsiusGPS robot in neuro-oncology procedures indicates a favorable efficacy and safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"57 6","pages":"E4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuro-oncology application of next-generation, optically tracked robotic stereotaxis with intraoperative computed tomography: a pilot experience.\",\"authors\":\"Carlin Chuck, Rohaid Ali, Christine K Lee, Athar N Malik, Konstantina A Svokos, Deus Cielo, Curtis E Doberstein, Harry J Rosenberg, Jerrold L Boxerman, Joseph Rajasekaran, Wael F Asaad, Ziya Gokaslan, Prakash Sampath, Clark C Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Innovations in robotics continue to reshape the landscape of neurosurgery. Here, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ExcelsiusGPS robot in the treatment of neuro-oncological, intracranial lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 19 consecutive adult patients with a neuro-oncological diagnosis who underwent intracranial biopsy and/or laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with the assistance of the ExcelsiusGPS robot and intraoperative CT. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record and the robot software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 19 patients harbored lesions that were deep seated, involving the eloquent cortex, or subcentimeter. Definitive tissue diagnosis was achieved in all cases involving stereotactic biopsy (n = 16), with glioblastoma as the most common diagnosis. The mean ± SD time for setting up the robotic stereotaxis system was 57.4 ± 10.7 minutes. The mean procedural time after that was 71.6 ± 41.0 minutes for stereotactic needle biopsy and 188.4 ± 61.2 minutes for procedures involving LITT. The mean radial errors of the actual trajectory relative to the planned trajectory at the entry and target points were 0.625 ± 0.443 mm and 0.745 ± 0.472 mm, respectively. There were no procedural complications or new postoperative deficits, although routine postoperative CT showed new hyperdensity at the target site in 3/19 patients (15.7%). All patients who underwent elective procedures were discharged by postoperative day 3 (mean 1.38 ± 0.619 days). There were two 30-day readmissions (pulmonary embolus and general weakness), and neither was attributable to the surgical procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors' pilot experience with the ExcelsiusGPS robot in neuro-oncology procedures indicates a favorable efficacy and safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"E4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.FOCUS24532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机器人技术的创新继续重塑神经外科的格局。在这里,作者评估了ExcelsiusGPS机器人治疗神经肿瘤、颅内病变的安全性和有效性。方法:在ExcelsiusGPS机器人和术中CT的帮助下,作者对19例连续接受颅内活检和/或激光间质热治疗(LITT)的神经肿瘤诊断的成人患者进行了回顾性分析。从电子病历和机器人软件中收集人口统计和临床数据。结果:19例患者均为深部病变,累及脑皮层或亚厘米。所有病例均通过立体定向活检(n = 16)获得明确的组织诊断,胶质母细胞瘤是最常见的诊断。建立机器人立体定向系统的平均±SD时间为57.4±10.7分钟。之后的平均手术时间,立体定向针活检为71.6±41.0分钟,LITT手术为188.4±61.2分钟。实际弹道相对于计划弹道在进入点和目标点的平均径向误差分别为0.625±0.443 mm和0.745±0.472 mm。虽然术后常规CT显示3/19(15.7%)患者靶区出现新的高密度,但无手术并发症或术后新缺损。所有择期手术患者均于术后第3天出院(平均1.38±0.619天)。有两个30天的再入院(肺栓塞和全身虚弱),都不是外科手术引起的。结论:作者在神经肿瘤手术中使用ExcelsiusGPS机器人的试验经验表明其具有良好的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuro-oncology application of next-generation, optically tracked robotic stereotaxis with intraoperative computed tomography: a pilot experience.

Objective: Innovations in robotics continue to reshape the landscape of neurosurgery. Here, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ExcelsiusGPS robot in the treatment of neuro-oncological, intracranial lesions.

Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 19 consecutive adult patients with a neuro-oncological diagnosis who underwent intracranial biopsy and/or laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with the assistance of the ExcelsiusGPS robot and intraoperative CT. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record and the robot software.

Results: All 19 patients harbored lesions that were deep seated, involving the eloquent cortex, or subcentimeter. Definitive tissue diagnosis was achieved in all cases involving stereotactic biopsy (n = 16), with glioblastoma as the most common diagnosis. The mean ± SD time for setting up the robotic stereotaxis system was 57.4 ± 10.7 minutes. The mean procedural time after that was 71.6 ± 41.0 minutes for stereotactic needle biopsy and 188.4 ± 61.2 minutes for procedures involving LITT. The mean radial errors of the actual trajectory relative to the planned trajectory at the entry and target points were 0.625 ± 0.443 mm and 0.745 ± 0.472 mm, respectively. There were no procedural complications or new postoperative deficits, although routine postoperative CT showed new hyperdensity at the target site in 3/19 patients (15.7%). All patients who underwent elective procedures were discharged by postoperative day 3 (mean 1.38 ± 0.619 days). There were two 30-day readmissions (pulmonary embolus and general weakness), and neither was attributable to the surgical procedure.

Conclusions: The authors' pilot experience with the ExcelsiusGPS robot in neuro-oncology procedures indicates a favorable efficacy and safety profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Contribution of watertight dural closure to prevention of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in endoscopic transnasal surgery for intradural lesions. Does the crafted abdominal fat grafting technique completely eliminate risk of postoperative CSF leak in endonasal pituitary surgery? Technical note and preliminary clinical outcome. Fibrin-coated collagen fleece "sandwich" closure technique for cranial and spinal dural reconstruction and closure. Dural and cranial reconstruction techniques in retrosigmoid craniotomy: key factors associated with CSF leaks in 225 patients. Frontal sinus mucosa suture closure technique for prevention of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after bifrontal craniotomy: long-term follow-up results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1