“我知道这在我的胸口,让我们行动起来”:一项通过痰色图探索急性慢性阻塞性肺病加重的自我管理以减少不必要的抗生素使用的定性研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1038/s41533-024-00398-3
R L Adams, M McKenna, K Allsopp, S Saleem, N Le Mesurier, N Diar Bakerly, A M Turner, N K Gale
{"title":"“我知道这在我的胸口,让我们行动起来”:一项通过痰色图探索急性慢性阻塞性肺病加重的自我管理以减少不必要的抗生素使用的定性研究。","authors":"R L Adams, M McKenna, K Allsopp, S Saleem, N Le Mesurier, N Diar Bakerly, A M Turner, N K Gale","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00398-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Half of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are caused by bacterial infection, but self-management plans (SMPs) generally advocate use of antibiotics and steroids for all events. We report findings from a qualitative study exploring the acceptability of a sputum colour chart and SMP to guide patient use of antibiotics and steroids (commonly termed a 'rescue pack'). Qualitative interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients from the Colour COPD trial - a randomised controlled trial of usual care (SMP alone) versus usual care plus sputum colour chart to manage AECOPD across England and sampled to promote maximum variation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed clean verbatim, then analysed thematically, using an adapted Framework approach. Expert patients contributed to the patient data analysis. Fourteen HCPs and 39 patients were interviewed from primary and secondary care. Three overarching themes were identified. (1) Handling tensions: the tension between stewardship of antimicrobials and need to reduce risk of serious illness. (2) Clinical and embodied legacies: established clinical practices of infection control and patient's own experiences of managing their condition over time have focused on early intervention for AECOPD. (3) Changing self-management practices: opportunities for changing practices through negotiating change between HCP and patient. In conclusion, while, in principle, the assessment of sputum colour using a chart to manage AECOPD was acceptable to both patients and HCPs, in practice, it is unlikely to have significant impact on well-established clinical practices for infection control and patient habits of self-management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"I know this is on my chest, let's act\\\": a qualitative study exploring self-management of acute COPD exacerbations with a sputum colour chart to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use.\",\"authors\":\"R L Adams, M McKenna, K Allsopp, S Saleem, N Le Mesurier, N Diar Bakerly, A M Turner, N K Gale\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41533-024-00398-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Half of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are caused by bacterial infection, but self-management plans (SMPs) generally advocate use of antibiotics and steroids for all events. We report findings from a qualitative study exploring the acceptability of a sputum colour chart and SMP to guide patient use of antibiotics and steroids (commonly termed a 'rescue pack'). Qualitative interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients from the Colour COPD trial - a randomised controlled trial of usual care (SMP alone) versus usual care plus sputum colour chart to manage AECOPD across England and sampled to promote maximum variation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed clean verbatim, then analysed thematically, using an adapted Framework approach. Expert patients contributed to the patient data analysis. Fourteen HCPs and 39 patients were interviewed from primary and secondary care. Three overarching themes were identified. (1) Handling tensions: the tension between stewardship of antimicrobials and need to reduce risk of serious illness. (2) Clinical and embodied legacies: established clinical practices of infection control and patient's own experiences of managing their condition over time have focused on early intervention for AECOPD. (3) Changing self-management practices: opportunities for changing practices through negotiating change between HCP and patient. In conclusion, while, in principle, the assessment of sputum colour using a chart to manage AECOPD was acceptable to both patients and HCPs, in practice, it is unlikely to have significant impact on well-established clinical practices for infection control and patient habits of self-management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00398-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00398-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)的急性加重有一半是由细菌感染引起的,但自我管理计划(SMPs)通常提倡对所有事件使用抗生素和类固醇。我们报告了一项定性研究的结果,该研究探讨了痰色图和SMP的可接受性,以指导患者使用抗生素和类固醇(通常称为“抢救包”)。对医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)和来自颜色COPD试验的患者进行了定性访谈-常规护理(单独SMP)与常规护理加痰颜色图的随机对照试验,以管理整个英格兰的AECOPD,并抽样以促进最大变化。访谈录音,逐字逐句记录下来,然后使用改编的框架方法按主题进行分析。专家患者为患者数据分析做出了贡献。14名HCPs和39名来自初级和二级保健的患者接受了访谈。确定了三个总体主题。(1)处理紧张关系:抗微生物药物管理与减少严重疾病风险的需要之间的紧张关系。(2)临床和具体遗产:感染控制的既定临床实践和患者自身管理病情的经验都集中在AECOPD的早期干预上。(3)改变自我管理实践:通过HCP与患者协商改变实践的机会。总之,虽然原则上使用图表评估痰液颜色来管理AECOPD对患者和医务人员都是可接受的,但在实践中,它不太可能对感染控制和患者自我管理习惯的既定临床实践产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"I know this is on my chest, let's act": a qualitative study exploring self-management of acute COPD exacerbations with a sputum colour chart to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use.

Half of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are caused by bacterial infection, but self-management plans (SMPs) generally advocate use of antibiotics and steroids for all events. We report findings from a qualitative study exploring the acceptability of a sputum colour chart and SMP to guide patient use of antibiotics and steroids (commonly termed a 'rescue pack'). Qualitative interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients from the Colour COPD trial - a randomised controlled trial of usual care (SMP alone) versus usual care plus sputum colour chart to manage AECOPD across England and sampled to promote maximum variation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed clean verbatim, then analysed thematically, using an adapted Framework approach. Expert patients contributed to the patient data analysis. Fourteen HCPs and 39 patients were interviewed from primary and secondary care. Three overarching themes were identified. (1) Handling tensions: the tension between stewardship of antimicrobials and need to reduce risk of serious illness. (2) Clinical and embodied legacies: established clinical practices of infection control and patient's own experiences of managing their condition over time have focused on early intervention for AECOPD. (3) Changing self-management practices: opportunities for changing practices through negotiating change between HCP and patient. In conclusion, while, in principle, the assessment of sputum colour using a chart to manage AECOPD was acceptable to both patients and HCPs, in practice, it is unlikely to have significant impact on well-established clinical practices for infection control and patient habits of self-management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
期刊最新文献
Differences in clinical characteristics between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Codeveloping a community-based, peer-led psychosocial support intervention to reduce stigma and depression among people with tuberculosis and their households in Indonesia: a mixed-methods participatory action study. The availability of drugs for stable COPD treatment in China: a cross-sectional survey. "I'm living in a 'no' world now…"- A qualitative study of the widespread impact of living with chronic breathlessness, and experiences of identification and assessment of this symptom in an older, frail community-based population. The effect of allergic rhinitis treatment on asthma control: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1