基于人工智能的病理诊断系统在胃癌淋巴转移中的诊断价值。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1159/000542852
Tiantian Zhao, Qiong Wu, Chenglou Zhu, Hong Ma, Mingxu Da
{"title":"基于人工智能的病理诊断系统在胃癌淋巴转移中的诊断价值。","authors":"Tiantian Zhao, Qiong Wu, Chenglou Zhu, Hong Ma, Mingxu Da","doi":"10.1159/000542852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with lymph node metastasis (LNM) being an independent prognostic factor. However, there are still challenges in the pathological diagnosis of LNM in GC. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting LNM in GC from whole-slide pathological images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As of March 24, 2024, a comprehensive search for studies on the pathological diagnosis of GC LNM AI was performed in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Meta-analysis of the included data was performed using Meta-DiSc 1.4, Review Manager 5.4, and Stata SE 17.0 software to calculate diagnostic metrics such as overall sensitivity and specificity. The overall diagnostic performance of the AI was assessed. Meta-regression analysis explored sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 articles involving 1,669 GC patients were included. The analysis showed that AI had a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) and a specificity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98) for the diagnosis of GC LNM, with significant heterogeneity across studies. The area under the curve was 0.97, indicating an excellent diagnostic value. Meta-regression analysis showed that the sample size and the number of study centers contributed to the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI for diagnosing LNM in GC from whole-slide pathological images demonstrates high accuracy, offering significant clinical implications for improving diagnosis and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Based Pathology Diagnosis System in Lymphatic Metastasis of Gastric Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Tiantian Zhao, Qiong Wu, Chenglou Zhu, Hong Ma, Mingxu Da\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with lymph node metastasis (LNM) being an independent prognostic factor. However, there are still challenges in the pathological diagnosis of LNM in GC. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting LNM in GC from whole-slide pathological images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As of March 24, 2024, a comprehensive search for studies on the pathological diagnosis of GC LNM AI was performed in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Meta-analysis of the included data was performed using Meta-DiSc 1.4, Review Manager 5.4, and Stata SE 17.0 software to calculate diagnostic metrics such as overall sensitivity and specificity. The overall diagnostic performance of the AI was assessed. Meta-regression analysis explored sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 articles involving 1,669 GC patients were included. The analysis showed that AI had a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) and a specificity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98) for the diagnosis of GC LNM, with significant heterogeneity across studies. The area under the curve was 0.97, indicating an excellent diagnostic value. Meta-regression analysis showed that the sample size and the number of study centers contributed to the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI for diagnosing LNM in GC from whole-slide pathological images demonstrates high accuracy, offering significant clinical implications for improving diagnosis and treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542852\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃癌仍然是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一,淋巴结转移(LNM)是一个独立的预后因素。然而,胃癌(GC)中LNM的病理诊断仍存在挑战。本荟萃分析的目的是系统地评估人工智能(AI)在从全片病理图像中检测GC中LNM的准确性。方法截至2024年3月24日,在PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、CNKI等数据库中全面检索GC - LNM AI的病理诊断研究。采用Meta-Disc 1.4、Review Manager 5.4和Stata SE 17.0软件对纳入的数据进行meta分析,计算诊断指标,如总体敏感性和特异性。评估人工智能的整体诊断性能。meta回归分析探讨异质性的来源。结果共纳入7篇文献,共1669例胃癌患者。分析显示,AI诊断GC - LNM的敏感性为0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94),特异性为0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98),各研究间存在显著异质性。曲线下面积为0.97,具有较好的诊断价值。meta回归分析显示,样本量和研究中心数量对异质性有影响。结论人工智能在全片病理图像上诊断GC中的LNM具有较高的准确性,对提高诊断和治疗策略具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Based Pathology Diagnosis System in Lymphatic Metastasis of Gastric Cancer.

Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with lymph node metastasis (LNM) being an independent prognostic factor. However, there are still challenges in the pathological diagnosis of LNM in GC. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting LNM in GC from whole-slide pathological images.

Methods: As of March 24, 2024, a comprehensive search for studies on the pathological diagnosis of GC LNM AI was performed in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Meta-analysis of the included data was performed using Meta-DiSc 1.4, Review Manager 5.4, and Stata SE 17.0 software to calculate diagnostic metrics such as overall sensitivity and specificity. The overall diagnostic performance of the AI was assessed. Meta-regression analysis explored sources of heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 7 articles involving 1,669 GC patients were included. The analysis showed that AI had a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.94) and a specificity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98) for the diagnosis of GC LNM, with significant heterogeneity across studies. The area under the curve was 0.97, indicating an excellent diagnostic value. Meta-regression analysis showed that the sample size and the number of study centers contributed to the heterogeneity.

Conclusion: AI for diagnosing LNM in GC from whole-slide pathological images demonstrates high accuracy, offering significant clinical implications for improving diagnosis and treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
期刊最新文献
High expression of tetraspanin CD63 predicts poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Analysis of Pleiotropic Effects of Nivolumab in Patients with Relapsed Pleural Mesothelioma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Constructing and Validating Models for Predicting Gleason Grade Group Upgrading Following Radical Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms and Conventional Logistic Regression. Post-Marketing Safety of Temozolomide: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Health-Related Quality of Life in a Real-World Cohort of Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1