抗egfr /BRAF/MEK靶向治疗BRAF突变转移性结直肠癌患者疗效的性别差异

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Seminars in oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.10.004
Laura Pala, Tommaso De Pas, Emilia Cocorocchio, Chiara Catania, Giovanni Ceresoli, Daniele Laszlo, Emma Zattarin, Giovanna Rossi, Fabio Conforti
{"title":"抗egfr /BRAF/MEK靶向治疗BRAF突变转移性结直肠癌患者疗效的性别差异","authors":"Laura Pala, Tommaso De Pas, Emilia Cocorocchio, Chiara Catania, Giovanni Ceresoli, Daniele Laszlo, Emma Zattarin, Giovanna Rossi, Fabio Conforti","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We previously showed that men with melanoma harboring BRAF mutations had significantly lower benefit from targeted therapy as compared with women Here we explored the hypothesis that such gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of BRAF-pathway blockade extends to other tumor histotypes carrying pathogenic BRAF-mutations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from a cohort of patients with advanced colorectal-cancer (CRC) harboring BRAF V600E mutations, treated with anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK targeted therapy. The primary objective was to assess the association between gender and outcome of patients treated with targeted therapy, in terms of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the association between gender and PFS and OS, adjusted for other relevant clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, including ECOG PS (0 vs 1-2), primary tumor site (right-side vs left-side), microsatellite instability status (instable [MSI] vs stable [MSS]), number of metastatic sites at treatment start, treatment type (double targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF] vs triple targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF + anti-MEK]) and mutational status of the RNF43 gene (wild type vs mutated).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight patients with advanced CRC were included in the analysis: 59 (60%) were women and 39 (40%) men. The ORR was 43.1% in women vs only 23.7% in men (p-value = .05). Multivariable analysis adjusted for relevant clinical, pathological, and molecular variables associated with patients' prognosis, showed a significantly shorter PFS and OS in men as compared with women: the adjusted-HR was, respectively, 1.65 (95%CI,1.00-2.69; p = .04) for PFS and 1.83 (95%CI,1.08-3.08; p-value = .02) for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed a significant gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK therapy in patients with advanced-CRC harboring BRAF mutations that warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender-Based Differences in the Efficacy of Anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK Targeted Therapy in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Pala, Tommaso De Pas, Emilia Cocorocchio, Chiara Catania, Giovanni Ceresoli, Daniele Laszlo, Emma Zattarin, Giovanna Rossi, Fabio Conforti\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We previously showed that men with melanoma harboring BRAF mutations had significantly lower benefit from targeted therapy as compared with women Here we explored the hypothesis that such gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of BRAF-pathway blockade extends to other tumor histotypes carrying pathogenic BRAF-mutations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from a cohort of patients with advanced colorectal-cancer (CRC) harboring BRAF V600E mutations, treated with anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK targeted therapy. The primary objective was to assess the association between gender and outcome of patients treated with targeted therapy, in terms of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the association between gender and PFS and OS, adjusted for other relevant clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, including ECOG PS (0 vs 1-2), primary tumor site (right-side vs left-side), microsatellite instability status (instable [MSI] vs stable [MSS]), number of metastatic sites at treatment start, treatment type (double targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF] vs triple targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF + anti-MEK]) and mutational status of the RNF43 gene (wild type vs mutated).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight patients with advanced CRC were included in the analysis: 59 (60%) were women and 39 (40%) men. The ORR was 43.1% in women vs only 23.7% in men (p-value = .05). Multivariable analysis adjusted for relevant clinical, pathological, and molecular variables associated with patients' prognosis, showed a significantly shorter PFS and OS in men as compared with women: the adjusted-HR was, respectively, 1.65 (95%CI,1.00-2.69; p = .04) for PFS and 1.83 (95%CI,1.08-3.08; p-value = .02) for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed a significant gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK therapy in patients with advanced-CRC harboring BRAF mutations that warrant further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.10.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.10.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们之前的研究表明,与女性相比,携带BRAF突变的男性黑色素瘤患者从靶向治疗中获得的益处明显较低。在这里,我们探索了这样一种假设,即BRAF通路阻断疗效的性别二型性延伸到其他携带致病性BRAF突变的肿瘤组织型。方法:我们回顾性分析了一组携带BRAF V600E突变的晚期结直肠癌(CRC)患者的数据,这些患者接受了抗egfr /BRAF/MEK靶向治疗。主要目的是评估性别与接受靶向治疗的患者预后之间的关系,包括总缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。使用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型评估性别与PFS和OS之间的关系,并根据其他相关临床、病理和分子预后因素进行调整,包括ECOG PS (0 vs 1-2)、原发肿瘤部位(右侧vs左侧)、微卫星不稳定状态(不稳定[MSI] vs稳定[MSS])、治疗开始时转移部位数量、治疗类型(双靶向治疗[即抗egfr + 抗braf] vs三联靶向治疗[即,抗egfr + 抗braf + 抗mek])和RNF43基因的突变状态(野生型与突变型)。结果:98例晚期结直肠癌患者纳入分析:女性59例(60%),男性39例(40%)。女性的ORR为43.1%,而男性只有23.7% (p值 = .05)。多变量分析校正了与患者预后相关的临床、病理和分子变量,结果显示男性的PFS和OS明显短于女性:调整后的hr分别为1.65 (95%CI,1.00-2.69;p = .04),1.83 (95%CI,1.08-3.08;p值 = .02)。结论:我们证实,在携带BRAF突变的晚期结直肠癌患者中,抗egfr /BRAF/MEK治疗的疗效存在显著的基于性别的二型性,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender-Based Differences in the Efficacy of Anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK Targeted Therapy in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Objectives: We previously showed that men with melanoma harboring BRAF mutations had significantly lower benefit from targeted therapy as compared with women Here we explored the hypothesis that such gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of BRAF-pathway blockade extends to other tumor histotypes carrying pathogenic BRAF-mutations.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from a cohort of patients with advanced colorectal-cancer (CRC) harboring BRAF V600E mutations, treated with anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK targeted therapy. The primary objective was to assess the association between gender and outcome of patients treated with targeted therapy, in terms of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the association between gender and PFS and OS, adjusted for other relevant clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, including ECOG PS (0 vs 1-2), primary tumor site (right-side vs left-side), microsatellite instability status (instable [MSI] vs stable [MSS]), number of metastatic sites at treatment start, treatment type (double targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF] vs triple targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF + anti-MEK]) and mutational status of the RNF43 gene (wild type vs mutated).

Results: Ninety-eight patients with advanced CRC were included in the analysis: 59 (60%) were women and 39 (40%) men. The ORR was 43.1% in women vs only 23.7% in men (p-value = .05). Multivariable analysis adjusted for relevant clinical, pathological, and molecular variables associated with patients' prognosis, showed a significantly shorter PFS and OS in men as compared with women: the adjusted-HR was, respectively, 1.65 (95%CI,1.00-2.69; p = .04) for PFS and 1.83 (95%CI,1.08-3.08; p-value = .02) for OS.

Conclusions: We confirmed a significant gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK therapy in patients with advanced-CRC harboring BRAF mutations that warrant further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
期刊最新文献
The likelihood of being helped or harmed obtained from clinical trial results for cancer therapy: Can it really help? Chemotherapy plus immunotherapy as first line combination in older patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gender-Based Differences in the Efficacy of Anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK Targeted Therapy in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Outside front cover Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1