Nicolas Fedirko, Kristi Jo Wilson, Roxanne Buterakos, Alyssa Pechta
{"title":"教育讲义对肥胖患者随访预约依从率的影响。","authors":"Nicolas Fedirko, Kristi Jo Wilson, Roxanne Buterakos, Alyssa Pechta","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Compliance rates for follow-up appointments are an issue for postoperative sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients. Without consistent reinforcement and monitoring of patient progress, patients tend to gain the weight back, all of the medical improvements made are lost, and the ability to access patients for potential complications is denied. Patients need much reinforcement during their forever bariatric lifestyle, and the lack of consistent reminders may contribute to follow-up noncompliance and recidivism in SG patients. As time progresses, the follow-up appointment compliance rate decreases. Decreased follow-up can lead to a higher risk for complications such as asymptomatic esophagitis, and current recommendations suggest that esophagogastroduodenoscopy screening should occur 3 years postoperatively. After 1 year, the follow-up compliance decreases dramatically so that by the 3-year postoperative period, very few patients are being seen and scheduled for interventions such as an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The objective of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient educational handout on SG bariatric patient follow-up visit compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental design and retrospective chart review was chosen. An educational handout was developed. Preintervention retrospective chart review consisted of 441 SG patients expecting a follow-up in 12 to 48 months. Postintervention included 3 months of the handout intervention with data collection totaling 198 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Follow-up compliance for 4 year visits noted 0% preintervention/12.2% postintervention (P = .008), for 3 year visits 13.4% preintervention/12% postintervention (P = .846), for 2 year visits 26.3% preintervention/28.6% postintervention (P = .755), for 18 months visits 26.3% preintervention/32.6% postintervention (P = .365), and for 12 months visits 54.2% preintervention/34.1% postintervention (P = .011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this quality improvement project, educational handouts did not have a statistical impact on follow-up compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Educational Handouts on the Compliance Rate for Bariatric Patient Follow-Up Appointments.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Fedirko, Kristi Jo Wilson, Roxanne Buterakos, Alyssa Pechta\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Compliance rates for follow-up appointments are an issue for postoperative sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients. Without consistent reinforcement and monitoring of patient progress, patients tend to gain the weight back, all of the medical improvements made are lost, and the ability to access patients for potential complications is denied. Patients need much reinforcement during their forever bariatric lifestyle, and the lack of consistent reminders may contribute to follow-up noncompliance and recidivism in SG patients. As time progresses, the follow-up appointment compliance rate decreases. Decreased follow-up can lead to a higher risk for complications such as asymptomatic esophagitis, and current recommendations suggest that esophagogastroduodenoscopy screening should occur 3 years postoperatively. After 1 year, the follow-up compliance decreases dramatically so that by the 3-year postoperative period, very few patients are being seen and scheduled for interventions such as an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The objective of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient educational handout on SG bariatric patient follow-up visit compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental design and retrospective chart review was chosen. An educational handout was developed. Preintervention retrospective chart review consisted of 441 SG patients expecting a follow-up in 12 to 48 months. Postintervention included 3 months of the handout intervention with data collection totaling 198 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Follow-up compliance for 4 year visits noted 0% preintervention/12.2% postintervention (P = .008), for 3 year visits 13.4% preintervention/12% postintervention (P = .846), for 2 year visits 26.3% preintervention/28.6% postintervention (P = .755), for 18 months visits 26.3% preintervention/32.6% postintervention (P = .365), and for 12 months visits 54.2% preintervention/34.1% postintervention (P = .011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this quality improvement project, educational handouts did not have a statistical impact on follow-up compliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Management in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Management in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000494\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Educational Handouts on the Compliance Rate for Bariatric Patient Follow-Up Appointments.
Background and objectives: Compliance rates for follow-up appointments are an issue for postoperative sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients. Without consistent reinforcement and monitoring of patient progress, patients tend to gain the weight back, all of the medical improvements made are lost, and the ability to access patients for potential complications is denied. Patients need much reinforcement during their forever bariatric lifestyle, and the lack of consistent reminders may contribute to follow-up noncompliance and recidivism in SG patients. As time progresses, the follow-up appointment compliance rate decreases. Decreased follow-up can lead to a higher risk for complications such as asymptomatic esophagitis, and current recommendations suggest that esophagogastroduodenoscopy screening should occur 3 years postoperatively. After 1 year, the follow-up compliance decreases dramatically so that by the 3-year postoperative period, very few patients are being seen and scheduled for interventions such as an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The objective of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient educational handout on SG bariatric patient follow-up visit compliance.
Methods: A quasi-experimental design and retrospective chart review was chosen. An educational handout was developed. Preintervention retrospective chart review consisted of 441 SG patients expecting a follow-up in 12 to 48 months. Postintervention included 3 months of the handout intervention with data collection totaling 198 patients.
Results: Follow-up compliance for 4 year visits noted 0% preintervention/12.2% postintervention (P = .008), for 3 year visits 13.4% preintervention/12% postintervention (P = .846), for 2 year visits 26.3% preintervention/28.6% postintervention (P = .755), for 18 months visits 26.3% preintervention/32.6% postintervention (P = .365), and for 12 months visits 54.2% preintervention/34.1% postintervention (P = .011).
Conclusion: In this quality improvement project, educational handouts did not have a statistical impact on follow-up compliance.
期刊介绍:
Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it:
-Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes;
-Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes;
-Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making;
-Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes;
-Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.