股骨粗隆间骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物的疗效:中国老年人群的再骨折率、功能恢复、并发症和死亡率的回顾性研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1779681
Weidong Zhao, Shengbao Chen, Chao Tang, Changqing Zhang
{"title":"股骨粗隆间骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物的疗效:中国老年人群的再骨折率、功能恢复、并发症和死亡率的回顾性研究。","authors":"Weidong Zhao, Shengbao Chen, Chao Tang, Changqing Zhang","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1779681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  This research aimed to discern the effects of antiosteoporosis medication on postoperative functional recovery, refracture incidence, complications, and mortality in geriatric patients with intertrochanteric fractures. <b>Methods</b>  A retrospective study was conducted on 250 patients aged 65 years and above who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric fractures between January 2013 and December 2014. Intertrochanteric fracture is diagnosed with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision code (S72.101) and classified by the Evans-Jensen system. Collected data encompassed demographic details, pre- and postoperative histories of antiosteoporotic medication, functional outcomes (measured using Harris hip score, Parker Mobility Score, and EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D] scores), refracture incidences, complications, and survival rates. The antiosteoporotic regimen was categorized into essential (calcium, vitamin D) and advanced medications (bisphosphonate, calcitonin, etc.). Outcomes between patients on antiosteoporosis treatment (AO group) and those without (control group) were compared. <b>Results</b>  The cohort comprised 250 patients, with a gender distribution of 85 males (34%) and 165 females (66%), and a mean age of 79.8 ± 7.0 years. The median follow-up period was 15.82 months (maximum 31.13 months). Postoperatively, 126 (50.4%) patients were administered antiosteoporotic treatment. The refracture incidence in the AO group (2.4%, <i>n</i>  = 3) was notably lower than the control group (8.9%, <i>n</i>  = 11), manifesting a substantial risk reduction (odds ratio 0.251, 95% confidence interval 0.068-0.920, <i>p</i>  = 0.024). While no marked differences in functional outcomes between the AO and control groups were observed (Harris score [96.17 ± 7.77 vs. 97.29 ± 6.74, <i>p</i>  = 0.074), Parker score [8.54 ± 1.26 vs. 8.62 ± 1.18, <i>p</i>  = 0.411], EQ-5D [0.83 ± 0.05 vs. 0.82 ± 0.06, <i>p</i>  = 0.186]), patients administered a combination of essential and advanced drugs showcased significantly improved Harris and EQ-5D scores compared to those on essential drugs alone (Harris score [77.93 ± 2.04 vs. 84.94 ± 2.73, <i>p</i>  = 0.015], EQ-5D [0.65 ± 0.03 vs. 0.75 ± 0.04, <i>p</i>  = 0.015]). <b>Conclusion</b>  Postoperative antiosteoporosis treatment acts as a deterrent against refracture following intertrochanteric fracture surgeries, evidenced by a decline in refracture rates. However, the treatment's impact on functional recovery, quality of life, complications, and mortality remains indistinct. Interestingly, the combined administration of essential and advanced antiosteoporotic drugs seems to foster enhanced functional outcomes, warranting further exploration in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"e11-e19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficiency of Antiosteoporosis Medicine after Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Study of Refracture Rate, Function Recovery, Complications, and Mortality in the Chinese Elderly Population.\",\"authors\":\"Weidong Zhao, Shengbao Chen, Chao Tang, Changqing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1779681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  This research aimed to discern the effects of antiosteoporosis medication on postoperative functional recovery, refracture incidence, complications, and mortality in geriatric patients with intertrochanteric fractures. <b>Methods</b>  A retrospective study was conducted on 250 patients aged 65 years and above who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric fractures between January 2013 and December 2014. Intertrochanteric fracture is diagnosed with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision code (S72.101) and classified by the Evans-Jensen system. Collected data encompassed demographic details, pre- and postoperative histories of antiosteoporotic medication, functional outcomes (measured using Harris hip score, Parker Mobility Score, and EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D] scores), refracture incidences, complications, and survival rates. The antiosteoporotic regimen was categorized into essential (calcium, vitamin D) and advanced medications (bisphosphonate, calcitonin, etc.). Outcomes between patients on antiosteoporosis treatment (AO group) and those without (control group) were compared. <b>Results</b>  The cohort comprised 250 patients, with a gender distribution of 85 males (34%) and 165 females (66%), and a mean age of 79.8 ± 7.0 years. The median follow-up period was 15.82 months (maximum 31.13 months). Postoperatively, 126 (50.4%) patients were administered antiosteoporotic treatment. The refracture incidence in the AO group (2.4%, <i>n</i>  = 3) was notably lower than the control group (8.9%, <i>n</i>  = 11), manifesting a substantial risk reduction (odds ratio 0.251, 95% confidence interval 0.068-0.920, <i>p</i>  = 0.024). While no marked differences in functional outcomes between the AO and control groups were observed (Harris score [96.17 ± 7.77 vs. 97.29 ± 6.74, <i>p</i>  = 0.074), Parker score [8.54 ± 1.26 vs. 8.62 ± 1.18, <i>p</i>  = 0.411], EQ-5D [0.83 ± 0.05 vs. 0.82 ± 0.06, <i>p</i>  = 0.186]), patients administered a combination of essential and advanced drugs showcased significantly improved Harris and EQ-5D scores compared to those on essential drugs alone (Harris score [77.93 ± 2.04 vs. 84.94 ± 2.73, <i>p</i>  = 0.015], EQ-5D [0.65 ± 0.03 vs. 0.75 ± 0.04, <i>p</i>  = 0.015]). <b>Conclusion</b>  Postoperative antiosteoporosis treatment acts as a deterrent against refracture following intertrochanteric fracture surgeries, evidenced by a decline in refracture rates. However, the treatment's impact on functional recovery, quality of life, complications, and mortality remains indistinct. Interestingly, the combined administration of essential and advanced antiosteoporotic drugs seems to foster enhanced functional outcomes, warranting further exploration in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"e11-e19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497099/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1779681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1779681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨抗骨质疏松药物对老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后功能恢复、再骨折发生率、并发症及死亡率的影响。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2014年12月间接受股骨粗隆间骨折手术治疗的250例65岁及以上患者。粗隆间骨折诊断依据国际疾病分类第10版(S72.101),采用Evans-Jensen系统进行分类。收集的数据包括人口统计学细节、术前和术后抗骨质疏松药物史、功能结局(使用Harris髋关节评分、Parker活动能力评分和EuroQol-5维度[EQ-5D]评分测量)、再骨折发生率、并发症和生存率。抗骨质疏松方案分为必需(钙、维生素D)和高级药物(双膦酸盐、降钙素等)。比较抗骨质疏松治疗组(AO组)和未治疗组(对照组)的结果。结果250例患者,性别分布为男性85例(34%),女性165例(66%),平均年龄79.8±7.0岁。中位随访时间为15.82个月(最长31.13个月)。术后126例(50.4%)患者接受抗骨质疏松治疗。AO组再骨折发生率(2.4%,n = 3)明显低于对照组(8.9%,n = 11),风险明显降低(优势比0.251,95%可信区间0.068 ~ 0.920,p = 0.024)。虽然没有显著差异功能结果AO和对照组之间的观察(哈里斯得分(96.17±7.77和97.29±6.74,p = 0.074),帕克得分(8.54±1.26和8.62±1.18,p = 0.411), EQ-5D(0.83±0.05和0.82±0.06,p = 0.186)),病人管理的基本和先进的药物组合展示显著提高哈里斯和EQ-5D分数相比仅基本药物(哈里斯得分(77.93±2.04和84.94±2.73,p = 0.015),EQ-5D(0.65±0.03和0.75±0.04,p = 0.015)。结论术后抗骨质疏松治疗对股骨粗隆间骨折手术后的再骨折具有威慑作用,再骨折率下降。然而,治疗对功能恢复、生活质量、并发症和死亡率的影响仍不清楚。有趣的是,基本抗骨质疏松药物和高级抗骨质疏松药物联合使用似乎可以增强功能结果,值得在未来的研究中进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Efficiency of Antiosteoporosis Medicine after Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Study of Refracture Rate, Function Recovery, Complications, and Mortality in the Chinese Elderly Population.

Objective  This research aimed to discern the effects of antiosteoporosis medication on postoperative functional recovery, refracture incidence, complications, and mortality in geriatric patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods  A retrospective study was conducted on 250 patients aged 65 years and above who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric fractures between January 2013 and December 2014. Intertrochanteric fracture is diagnosed with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision code (S72.101) and classified by the Evans-Jensen system. Collected data encompassed demographic details, pre- and postoperative histories of antiosteoporotic medication, functional outcomes (measured using Harris hip score, Parker Mobility Score, and EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D] scores), refracture incidences, complications, and survival rates. The antiosteoporotic regimen was categorized into essential (calcium, vitamin D) and advanced medications (bisphosphonate, calcitonin, etc.). Outcomes between patients on antiosteoporosis treatment (AO group) and those without (control group) were compared. Results  The cohort comprised 250 patients, with a gender distribution of 85 males (34%) and 165 females (66%), and a mean age of 79.8 ± 7.0 years. The median follow-up period was 15.82 months (maximum 31.13 months). Postoperatively, 126 (50.4%) patients were administered antiosteoporotic treatment. The refracture incidence in the AO group (2.4%, n  = 3) was notably lower than the control group (8.9%, n  = 11), manifesting a substantial risk reduction (odds ratio 0.251, 95% confidence interval 0.068-0.920, p  = 0.024). While no marked differences in functional outcomes between the AO and control groups were observed (Harris score [96.17 ± 7.77 vs. 97.29 ± 6.74, p  = 0.074), Parker score [8.54 ± 1.26 vs. 8.62 ± 1.18, p  = 0.411], EQ-5D [0.83 ± 0.05 vs. 0.82 ± 0.06, p  = 0.186]), patients administered a combination of essential and advanced drugs showcased significantly improved Harris and EQ-5D scores compared to those on essential drugs alone (Harris score [77.93 ± 2.04 vs. 84.94 ± 2.73, p  = 0.015], EQ-5D [0.65 ± 0.03 vs. 0.75 ± 0.04, p  = 0.015]). Conclusion  Postoperative antiosteoporosis treatment acts as a deterrent against refracture following intertrochanteric fracture surgeries, evidenced by a decline in refracture rates. However, the treatment's impact on functional recovery, quality of life, complications, and mortality remains indistinct. Interestingly, the combined administration of essential and advanced antiosteoporotic drugs seems to foster enhanced functional outcomes, warranting further exploration in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Journal
Surgery Journal SURGERY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pediatric Obesity's Effect on Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy Outcomes. Editorial: Unifying the Global Surgical Community. Internal Hernia Post-Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Case Series with Review of Literature. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Female Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery with Double Prophylactic Therapy. Central Pancreatectomy: Balancing between the Favorable Functional Results and the Increased Associated Morbidity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1