引入“蓝卡”脑震荡政策到半精英澳大利亚足球:医务人员的经验和看法。

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.125794
Jacob R Msando, Gill Cowen, Sarah A Harris, Troy Kirkham, Myles C Murphy
{"title":"引入“蓝卡”脑震荡政策到半精英澳大利亚足球:医务人员的经验和看法。","authors":"Jacob R Msando, Gill Cowen, Sarah A Harris, Troy Kirkham, Myles C Murphy","doi":"10.26603/001c.125794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Western Australian Football League (WAFL) introduced a new umpire driven 'blue-card rule' for concussion, but its benefit to the sports medicine team is unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the experiences and perceptions of medical staff within the 2022-2023 Men's and Women's WAFL competitions following the introduction of the 'blue-card rule'.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey was delivered through Qualtrics to all WAFL medical staff (doctors, physiotherapists, head trainers). The survey contained four sections (demographics, concussion knowledge, concussion exposure and blue-card perceptions) with closed and multiple-answer questions. Standard methods for reporting descriptive data were applied, including mean ± standard deviation (SD) and proportions (%). Between-group differences were assessed using chi-square tests, and significance was accepted at p <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate was 48% (n=7 doctors, n=12 physiotherapists, n=12 head trainers). Most staff (70%) did not agree that the 'blue-card rule' was a helpful concussion policy or should remain within the WAFL. Staff also felt umpires are not qualified to identify suspected concussions on-field (67%). Over two-thirds of medical staff feel the Football Commission needs to provide education about concussion policies before the commencement of each season. Only 33% of medical staff felt completely confident in delivering a sideline assessment, and 17% felt completely confident in their diagnostic capabilities. Relationships between medical and other staff were not substantially impacted by the 'blue-card rule'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical staff within the WAFL reported the 'blue-card rule' as an ineffective concussion identification tool and did not support its continued use for future WAFL seasons. Staff suggested that the Football Commission needs to provide more education on concussion policies before the commencement of each season.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"19 12","pages":"1569-1580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction of the 'Blue Card' Concussion Policy to Semi-Elite Australian Football: Medical Staff Experiences and Perceptions.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob R Msando, Gill Cowen, Sarah A Harris, Troy Kirkham, Myles C Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.125794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Western Australian Football League (WAFL) introduced a new umpire driven 'blue-card rule' for concussion, but its benefit to the sports medicine team is unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the experiences and perceptions of medical staff within the 2022-2023 Men's and Women's WAFL competitions following the introduction of the 'blue-card rule'.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey was delivered through Qualtrics to all WAFL medical staff (doctors, physiotherapists, head trainers). The survey contained four sections (demographics, concussion knowledge, concussion exposure and blue-card perceptions) with closed and multiple-answer questions. Standard methods for reporting descriptive data were applied, including mean ± standard deviation (SD) and proportions (%). Between-group differences were assessed using chi-square tests, and significance was accepted at p <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate was 48% (n=7 doctors, n=12 physiotherapists, n=12 head trainers). Most staff (70%) did not agree that the 'blue-card rule' was a helpful concussion policy or should remain within the WAFL. Staff also felt umpires are not qualified to identify suspected concussions on-field (67%). Over two-thirds of medical staff feel the Football Commission needs to provide education about concussion policies before the commencement of each season. Only 33% of medical staff felt completely confident in delivering a sideline assessment, and 17% felt completely confident in their diagnostic capabilities. Relationships between medical and other staff were not substantially impacted by the 'blue-card rule'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical staff within the WAFL reported the 'blue-card rule' as an ineffective concussion identification tool and did not support its continued use for future WAFL seasons. Staff suggested that the Football Commission needs to provide more education on concussion policies before the commencement of each season.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"1569-1580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611476/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.125794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.125794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:西澳大利亚足球联盟(WAFL)引入了一项新的由裁判驱动的脑震荡“蓝卡规则”,但它对运动医学团队的好处尚不清楚。目的:确定在引入“蓝卡规则”后,2022-2023年男子和女子WAFL比赛中医务人员的经验和看法。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:通过Qualtrics对所有WAFL医务人员(医生、物理治疗师、首席培训师)进行在线调查。该调查包含四个部分(人口统计、脑震荡知识、脑震荡暴露和蓝卡认知),其中包括封闭式和多答案问题。描述性数据的报告采用标准方法,包括均数±标准差(SD)和比例(%)。结果:有效率为48% (n=7名医生,n=12名物理治疗师,n=12名头部训练师)。大多数员工(70%)不同意“蓝卡规则”是一个有益的脑震荡政策,或者应该留在WAFL。工作人员还认为裁判没有资格在球场上识别疑似脑震荡(67%)。超过三分之二的医务人员认为足球委员会需要在每个赛季开始前提供有关脑震荡政策的教育。只有33%的医务人员对提供副业评估完全有信心,17%的医务人员对自己的诊断能力完全有信心。医务人员和其他工作人员之间的关系没有受到“蓝卡规则”的实质性影响。结论:WAFL的医务人员报告说,“蓝卡规则”是一种无效的脑震荡识别工具,不支持在未来的WAFL赛季继续使用。工作人员建议,足球委员会需要在每个赛季开始前提供更多关于脑震荡政策的教育。证据等级:3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction of the 'Blue Card' Concussion Policy to Semi-Elite Australian Football: Medical Staff Experiences and Perceptions.

Background: The Western Australian Football League (WAFL) introduced a new umpire driven 'blue-card rule' for concussion, but its benefit to the sports medicine team is unknown.

Purpose: To determine the experiences and perceptions of medical staff within the 2022-2023 Men's and Women's WAFL competitions following the introduction of the 'blue-card rule'.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Method: An online survey was delivered through Qualtrics to all WAFL medical staff (doctors, physiotherapists, head trainers). The survey contained four sections (demographics, concussion knowledge, concussion exposure and blue-card perceptions) with closed and multiple-answer questions. Standard methods for reporting descriptive data were applied, including mean ± standard deviation (SD) and proportions (%). Between-group differences were assessed using chi-square tests, and significance was accepted at p <0.05.

Results: Response rate was 48% (n=7 doctors, n=12 physiotherapists, n=12 head trainers). Most staff (70%) did not agree that the 'blue-card rule' was a helpful concussion policy or should remain within the WAFL. Staff also felt umpires are not qualified to identify suspected concussions on-field (67%). Over two-thirds of medical staff feel the Football Commission needs to provide education about concussion policies before the commencement of each season. Only 33% of medical staff felt completely confident in delivering a sideline assessment, and 17% felt completely confident in their diagnostic capabilities. Relationships between medical and other staff were not substantially impacted by the 'blue-card rule'.

Conclusions: Medical staff within the WAFL reported the 'blue-card rule' as an ineffective concussion identification tool and did not support its continued use for future WAFL seasons. Staff suggested that the Football Commission needs to provide more education on concussion policies before the commencement of each season.

Level of evidence: 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Vestibular Rehabilitation in Children Post-Concussion: A Systematic Review. Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Bodyweight One-Legged and Two-Legged BOSU and Floor Squats. Reliability of Ultrasound Based Compressibility of the Lower Leg Anterior Tibial Muscle Compartment in Healthy Volunteers. The Effect of the Addition of Core Exercises to Supervised Physiotherapy in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. The Effects of Noxious Electrical Stimulation and Eccentric Exercise on Mechanical and Thermal Pain Sensitivity in Recreational Runners with Achilles Tendinopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1