{"title":"智能手机色度计应用与分光光度法测量颌面部假体制作中前额皮肤颜色的比较分析。","authors":"Somayeh Niakan, Mahdi Safi, Shima Younespour, Shayan Khoshtarkib","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of two smartphone colorimeter apps, Color Grab, and Color Picker, in measuring forehead skin color and to compare their readings with those from a spectrophotometer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty participants (26 males, 24 females; median age 23 years, range 21-45) were included. Using a smartphone camera, images of forehead skin were captured, and CIELAB color values were reported by both apps. Measurements from a reference spectrophotometer (MiniScan EZ 4500L, 45°/0° geometry) served as the gold standard. Trueness and precision were assessed using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 formulas. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney tests, with significance at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both apps showed comparable accuracy in capturing skin color, with absolute trueness (ΔE<sub>Abs</sub>) for Color Grab at 7.59 (CIEDE2000) and Color Picker at 7.65. Relative trueness (ΔE<sub>Rel</sub>) was 3.79 for Color Grab and 3.70 for Color Picker. Precision (MCDM) demonstrated significant differences between the apps: Color Grab at 1.34 (CIEDE2000) compared to Color Picker at 0.96 (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While smartphone apps may not match the accuracy of spectrophotometers, they offer valuable alternatives for color matching in maxillofacial prostheses. Future studies should focus on minimizing systematic errors related to environmental factors and camera settings to enhance measurement accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of smartphone colorimeter apps and spectrophotometry for measuring forehead skin color in maxillofacial prosthesis fabrication.\",\"authors\":\"Somayeh Niakan, Mahdi Safi, Shima Younespour, Shayan Khoshtarkib\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.13970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of two smartphone colorimeter apps, Color Grab, and Color Picker, in measuring forehead skin color and to compare their readings with those from a spectrophotometer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty participants (26 males, 24 females; median age 23 years, range 21-45) were included. Using a smartphone camera, images of forehead skin were captured, and CIELAB color values were reported by both apps. Measurements from a reference spectrophotometer (MiniScan EZ 4500L, 45°/0° geometry) served as the gold standard. Trueness and precision were assessed using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 formulas. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney tests, with significance at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both apps showed comparable accuracy in capturing skin color, with absolute trueness (ΔE<sub>Abs</sub>) for Color Grab at 7.59 (CIEDE2000) and Color Picker at 7.65. Relative trueness (ΔE<sub>Rel</sub>) was 3.79 for Color Grab and 3.70 for Color Picker. Precision (MCDM) demonstrated significant differences between the apps: Color Grab at 1.34 (CIEDE2000) compared to Color Picker at 0.96 (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While smartphone apps may not match the accuracy of spectrophotometers, they offer valuable alternatives for color matching in maxillofacial prostheses. Future studies should focus on minimizing systematic errors related to environmental factors and camera settings to enhance measurement accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13970\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13970","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of smartphone colorimeter apps and spectrophotometry for measuring forehead skin color in maxillofacial prosthesis fabrication.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of two smartphone colorimeter apps, Color Grab, and Color Picker, in measuring forehead skin color and to compare their readings with those from a spectrophotometer.
Materials and methods: Fifty participants (26 males, 24 females; median age 23 years, range 21-45) were included. Using a smartphone camera, images of forehead skin were captured, and CIELAB color values were reported by both apps. Measurements from a reference spectrophotometer (MiniScan EZ 4500L, 45°/0° geometry) served as the gold standard. Trueness and precision were assessed using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 formulas. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney tests, with significance at p < 0.05.
Results: Both apps showed comparable accuracy in capturing skin color, with absolute trueness (ΔEAbs) for Color Grab at 7.59 (CIEDE2000) and Color Picker at 7.65. Relative trueness (ΔERel) was 3.79 for Color Grab and 3.70 for Color Picker. Precision (MCDM) demonstrated significant differences between the apps: Color Grab at 1.34 (CIEDE2000) compared to Color Picker at 0.96 (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: While smartphone apps may not match the accuracy of spectrophotometers, they offer valuable alternatives for color matching in maxillofacial prostheses. Future studies should focus on minimizing systematic errors related to environmental factors and camera settings to enhance measurement accuracy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.