[以博物馆为基础的社区项目对痴呆症患者及其主要照顾者的影响-概略回顾]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1007/s00391-024-02377-2
Melanie Kriegseisen-Peruzzi, Mona Dür, Verena C Tatzer, Piret Paal
{"title":"[以博物馆为基础的社区项目对痴呆症患者及其主要照顾者的影响-概略回顾]。","authors":"Melanie Kriegseisen-Peruzzi, Mona Dür, Verena C Tatzer, Piret Paal","doi":"10.1007/s00391-024-02377-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been noticeable research emphasis on the effects of museum-based programs as valuable community support for people with dementia and their primary caregivers.</p><p><strong>Research question and aim: </strong>This umbrella review outlines the effects of museum-based community programs on health-related aspects of people with dementia and their primary caregivers and aims to synthesise existing evidence of museum-based programs and give directions for practice and implementation research.</p><p><strong>Method and material: </strong>An umbrella review was undertaken following the guideline of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Therefore 6 databases (CINAHL Complete, PubMed, Medline Complete, SocINDEX, Psych & Behav Sci and the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews) were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in April/May 2023 and as a follow-up in October 2023. The results were critically appraised by three reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of five systematic reviews and one meta-analysis were identified. Due to the heterogeneity of the primary studies no consistent statistically robust proof of effects of museum-based community programs currently exists. Qualitative studies support the effects towards improvement of quality of life, mood and other noncognitive parameters.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>While the heterogeneity of study designs prevents a critical evaluation of the effects and therefore a reliable comprehensible analysis, the results from different studies, including randomized controlled trials, support museum-based programs as a valuable resource for participation in day to day care and social prescribing. For future research adapted and extended methodological considerations and approaches, such as mixed methods designs are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11779787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effects of museum-based community programs on people with dementia and their primary caregivers-An umbrella review].\",\"authors\":\"Melanie Kriegseisen-Peruzzi, Mona Dür, Verena C Tatzer, Piret Paal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00391-024-02377-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been noticeable research emphasis on the effects of museum-based programs as valuable community support for people with dementia and their primary caregivers.</p><p><strong>Research question and aim: </strong>This umbrella review outlines the effects of museum-based community programs on health-related aspects of people with dementia and their primary caregivers and aims to synthesise existing evidence of museum-based programs and give directions for practice and implementation research.</p><p><strong>Method and material: </strong>An umbrella review was undertaken following the guideline of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Therefore 6 databases (CINAHL Complete, PubMed, Medline Complete, SocINDEX, Psych & Behav Sci and the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews) were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in April/May 2023 and as a follow-up in October 2023. The results were critically appraised by three reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of five systematic reviews and one meta-analysis were identified. Due to the heterogeneity of the primary studies no consistent statistically robust proof of effects of museum-based community programs currently exists. Qualitative studies support the effects towards improvement of quality of life, mood and other noncognitive parameters.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>While the heterogeneity of study designs prevents a critical evaluation of the effects and therefore a reliable comprehensible analysis, the results from different studies, including randomized controlled trials, support museum-based programs as a valuable resource for participation in day to day care and social prescribing. For future research adapted and extended methodological considerations and approaches, such as mixed methods designs are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"33-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11779787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-024-02377-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-024-02377-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:已经有明显的研究强调以博物馆为基础的项目对痴呆症患者及其主要照顾者有价值的社区支持的影响。研究问题和目的:本综述概述了以博物馆为基础的社区项目对痴呆症患者及其主要照顾者健康相关方面的影响,旨在综合博物馆为基础的项目的现有证据,并为实践和实施研究提供指导。方法和材料:遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的指导方针进行了总括性审查。因此,我们于2023年4月/ 5月检索了6个数据库(CINAHL Complete、PubMed、Medline Complete、SocINDEX、Psych & Behav Sci和Cochrane系统评价数据库)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并于2023年10月进行了随访。结果由三位审稿人进行了严格的评估。结果:共确定了5项系统评价和1项荟萃分析。由于初步研究的异质性,目前还没有一致的统计证据证明以博物馆为基础的社区项目的效果。定性研究支持对改善生活质量、情绪和其他非认知参数的影响。讨论和结论:虽然研究设计的异质性阻碍了对效果的批判性评估,因此无法进行可靠的可理解分析,但来自不同研究的结果,包括随机对照试验,支持以博物馆为基础的项目作为参与日常护理和社会处方的宝贵资源。对于未来的研究,建议采用和扩展方法学考虑和方法,例如混合方法设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Effects of museum-based community programs on people with dementia and their primary caregivers-An umbrella review].

Background: There has been noticeable research emphasis on the effects of museum-based programs as valuable community support for people with dementia and their primary caregivers.

Research question and aim: This umbrella review outlines the effects of museum-based community programs on health-related aspects of people with dementia and their primary caregivers and aims to synthesise existing evidence of museum-based programs and give directions for practice and implementation research.

Method and material: An umbrella review was undertaken following the guideline of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Therefore 6 databases (CINAHL Complete, PubMed, Medline Complete, SocINDEX, Psych & Behav Sci and the Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews) were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in April/May 2023 and as a follow-up in October 2023. The results were critically appraised by three reviewers.

Results: A total of five systematic reviews and one meta-analysis were identified. Due to the heterogeneity of the primary studies no consistent statistically robust proof of effects of museum-based community programs currently exists. Qualitative studies support the effects towards improvement of quality of life, mood and other noncognitive parameters.

Discussion and conclusion: While the heterogeneity of study designs prevents a critical evaluation of the effects and therefore a reliable comprehensible analysis, the results from different studies, including randomized controlled trials, support museum-based programs as a valuable resource for participation in day to day care and social prescribing. For future research adapted and extended methodological considerations and approaches, such as mixed methods designs are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
期刊最新文献
Zauber der Kultur: zum Tod von Hans-Joachim von Kondratowitz (1. Juni 1945 bis 19. November 2024). Hyponatremia in geriatric patients. [Characteristics of applicants with first-time determination of need for long-term care-A nationwide analysis of care assessments of applicants insured with the AOK aged 60 years and above]. [Effects of museum-based community programs on people with dementia and their primary caregivers-An umbrella review]. [Suicide prevention and assisted suicide - incompatible?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1