严峻静脉-静脉体外膜氧合插管与管理训练模型的验证。

Elizabeth K Powell, Tyler Reynolds, James K Webb, Rishi Kundi, Meaghan Keville, Douglas H Anderson, Ann E Matta, Sarah Juhasz, Bradley S Taylor, Samuel Galvagno, Thomas M Scalea
{"title":"严峻静脉-静脉体外膜氧合插管与管理训练模型的验证。","authors":"Elizabeth K Powell, Tyler Reynolds, James K Webb, Rishi Kundi, Meaghan Keville, Douglas H Anderson, Ann E Matta, Sarah Juhasz, Bradley S Taylor, Samuel Galvagno, Thomas M Scalea","doi":"10.55460/0505-7RMI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is used in trauma patients with pulmonary injury in the acute setting. The United States Military has an advanced ECMO transport and management capability; however, future conflicts may require forward prolonged casualty care (PCC). Special Operations Surgical Teams (SOSTs) provide damage control surgery, resuscitation, and PCC in forward, unregulated, multidomain environments. We hypothesize that SOSTs can be trained to cannulate and manage patients requiring VV ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a 2.5-day course using knowledge assessments (25 questions), self-assessments (5-point Likert scale, moderate confidence=3), and instruction checklists. The instruction checklists were used to assess performance during final evaluation with Yorkshire swine (Sus scrofa) models. Data were tested for normality, and statistical significance was defined as P<.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve qualified SOST personnel completed the training. Four participants reported previous ECMO clinical exposure, and none reported formal ECMO training. When comparing pre- and post-course knowledge assessment scores, there was a significant improvement in overall scores (12.5 vs. 20.6, P<.001). The number of participants who self-reported at least moderate confidence in cognitive (2.8 vs. 11.3, P<.001), technical (1.2 vs. 11.6, P<.001), and behavioral (2 vs. 12, P<.001) aspects of VV ECMO set-up, cannulation, and management increased. Each team successfully set up, cannulated, and managed models with lights on and in darkness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a cohort of United States Air Force SOST personnel, using a modified training curriculum with 2-hour, hands-on validation testing improved self-assessment and knowledge assessment scores in performing VV ECMO. Given the rise of extracorporeal support use in the care of medical and trauma patients and the possibility of PCC in the military population, forward VV ECMO training and sustainment should be studied further.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Training Model for Austere Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation and Management.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth K Powell, Tyler Reynolds, James K Webb, Rishi Kundi, Meaghan Keville, Douglas H Anderson, Ann E Matta, Sarah Juhasz, Bradley S Taylor, Samuel Galvagno, Thomas M Scalea\",\"doi\":\"10.55460/0505-7RMI\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is used in trauma patients with pulmonary injury in the acute setting. The United States Military has an advanced ECMO transport and management capability; however, future conflicts may require forward prolonged casualty care (PCC). Special Operations Surgical Teams (SOSTs) provide damage control surgery, resuscitation, and PCC in forward, unregulated, multidomain environments. We hypothesize that SOSTs can be trained to cannulate and manage patients requiring VV ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a 2.5-day course using knowledge assessments (25 questions), self-assessments (5-point Likert scale, moderate confidence=3), and instruction checklists. The instruction checklists were used to assess performance during final evaluation with Yorkshire swine (Sus scrofa) models. Data were tested for normality, and statistical significance was defined as P<.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve qualified SOST personnel completed the training. Four participants reported previous ECMO clinical exposure, and none reported formal ECMO training. When comparing pre- and post-course knowledge assessment scores, there was a significant improvement in overall scores (12.5 vs. 20.6, P<.001). The number of participants who self-reported at least moderate confidence in cognitive (2.8 vs. 11.3, P<.001), technical (1.2 vs. 11.6, P<.001), and behavioral (2 vs. 12, P<.001) aspects of VV ECMO set-up, cannulation, and management increased. Each team successfully set up, cannulated, and managed models with lights on and in darkness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a cohort of United States Air Force SOST personnel, using a modified training curriculum with 2-hour, hands-on validation testing improved self-assessment and knowledge assessment scores in performing VV ECMO. Given the rise of extracorporeal support use in the care of medical and trauma patients and the possibility of PCC in the military population, forward VV ECMO training and sustainment should be studied further.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55460/0505-7RMI\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/0505-7RMI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV ECMO)用于急性肺损伤的创伤患者。美国军方拥有先进的ECMO运输和管理能力;然而,未来的冲突可能需要向前延长伤亡护理(PCC)。特种作战外科小组(SOSTs)在向前、不规范、多域环境中提供损伤控制手术、复苏和PCC。我们假设sost可以训练为需要VV ECMO的患者插管和管理。方法:我们开发了一个2.5天的课程,使用知识评估(25个问题),自我评估(5点李克特量表,中等置信度=3)和教学清单。在约克郡猪(Sus scrofa)模型的最终评估中,使用指令检查表来评估性能。结果:有12名合格的SOST人员完成了培训。4名参与者报告了之前的ECMO临床暴露,没有人报告了正式的ECMO培训。在比较课前和课后的知识评估得分时,总体得分有显著提高(12.5 vs. 20.6)。结论:在美国空军SOST人员队列中,使用改进的培训课程和2小时的实践验证测试提高了VV ECMO的自我评估和知识评估得分。鉴于体外支持在医疗和创伤患者护理中的使用的增加以及军事人群中PCC的可能性,应进一步研究VV ECMO的前方训练和维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a Training Model for Austere Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation and Management.

Introduction: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is used in trauma patients with pulmonary injury in the acute setting. The United States Military has an advanced ECMO transport and management capability; however, future conflicts may require forward prolonged casualty care (PCC). Special Operations Surgical Teams (SOSTs) provide damage control surgery, resuscitation, and PCC in forward, unregulated, multidomain environments. We hypothesize that SOSTs can be trained to cannulate and manage patients requiring VV ECMO.

Methods: We developed a 2.5-day course using knowledge assessments (25 questions), self-assessments (5-point Likert scale, moderate confidence=3), and instruction checklists. The instruction checklists were used to assess performance during final evaluation with Yorkshire swine (Sus scrofa) models. Data were tested for normality, and statistical significance was defined as P<.05.

Results: Twelve qualified SOST personnel completed the training. Four participants reported previous ECMO clinical exposure, and none reported formal ECMO training. When comparing pre- and post-course knowledge assessment scores, there was a significant improvement in overall scores (12.5 vs. 20.6, P<.001). The number of participants who self-reported at least moderate confidence in cognitive (2.8 vs. 11.3, P<.001), technical (1.2 vs. 11.6, P<.001), and behavioral (2 vs. 12, P<.001) aspects of VV ECMO set-up, cannulation, and management increased. Each team successfully set up, cannulated, and managed models with lights on and in darkness.

Conclusions: In a cohort of United States Air Force SOST personnel, using a modified training curriculum with 2-hour, hands-on validation testing improved self-assessment and knowledge assessment scores in performing VV ECMO. Given the rise of extracorporeal support use in the care of medical and trauma patients and the possibility of PCC in the military population, forward VV ECMO training and sustainment should be studied further.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
The Use of Different Types of Supraglottic Airway Devices by Medics on a Manikin with Night Vision Goggles: A Pilot Study. Special Operations Forces Lessons Learned: Beirut Blast. Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquets: Clinically Important Increases in Pressure in Aortic Zone 1 and Zone 3 in a Cadaveric Study Directly Relevant to Combat Medics Treating Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage. Chronicity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparison of Special Operators and Conventional Forces. On Saving - The Psychosocial Benefit of Saving Lives in War and Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1