Icare HOME眼压计与Goldmann眼压计在饮水试验中评估眼压峰值的一致性。

Q2 Medicine Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2024.11.008
Carolina N Susanna, Fernanda N Susanna, Laura Goldfarb Cyrino, Renato Antunes Schiave Germano, Remo Susanna, Pradeep Y Ramulu, Marcelo Hatanaka
{"title":"Icare HOME眼压计与Goldmann眼压计在饮水试验中评估眼压峰值的一致性。","authors":"Carolina N Susanna, Fernanda N Susanna, Laura Goldfarb Cyrino, Renato Antunes Schiave Germano, Remo Susanna, Pradeep Y Ramulu, Marcelo Hatanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the agreement between the ICare HOME tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) in assessing the peak intraocular pressure (IOP) during the water-drinking test (WDT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Seventy-nine eyes of 41 open-angle glaucoma patients were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All of the included patients underwent a training session provided by ophthalmologist specialists to use the ICare HOME tonometer. Then the IOP was first measured with the GAT (AT900; Haag-Streit) by a trained physician, immediately followed by ICare HOME tonometer (TA022, ICare Oy) measurement by the patient. Four measurements were taken with each device with 15-minute differences as established by the WDT.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The agreement and degree of correlation of the peak IOP by both tonometers were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement between the ICare HOME and GAT was high during the WDT: the intraclass correlation coefficient (r) between the 2 methods from basal to 45 minutes: 0.94 (P < 0.001), at basal: 0.91 (P < 0.001), at 15 minutes: 0.94 (P < 0.001), at 30 minutes: 0.94 (P < 0.001), at 45 minutes: 0.95 (P < 0.001), and for peak IOP: 0.94 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between peak IOP with the GAT and ICare HOME (18.3 ± 4.6 [10-33] and 18.5 ± 5.0 [0-33], respectively, P = 0.533), nor between the delta of fluctuation between basal and peak IOP with the GAT and ICare HOME (3.96 ± 3.22 and 4.54 ± 3.92, P = 0.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated a high agreement between the ICare HOME and the GAT during the WDT in a clinical environment with supervision.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement between the ICare HOME Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in the Assessment of the Peak Intraocular Pressure in the Water-Drinking Test.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina N Susanna, Fernanda N Susanna, Laura Goldfarb Cyrino, Renato Antunes Schiave Germano, Remo Susanna, Pradeep Y Ramulu, Marcelo Hatanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ogla.2024.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the agreement between the ICare HOME tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) in assessing the peak intraocular pressure (IOP) during the water-drinking test (WDT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Seventy-nine eyes of 41 open-angle glaucoma patients were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All of the included patients underwent a training session provided by ophthalmologist specialists to use the ICare HOME tonometer. Then the IOP was first measured with the GAT (AT900; Haag-Streit) by a trained physician, immediately followed by ICare HOME tonometer (TA022, ICare Oy) measurement by the patient. Four measurements were taken with each device with 15-minute differences as established by the WDT.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The agreement and degree of correlation of the peak IOP by both tonometers were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement between the ICare HOME and GAT was high during the WDT: the intraclass correlation coefficient (r) between the 2 methods from basal to 45 minutes: 0.94 (P < 0.001), at basal: 0.91 (P < 0.001), at 15 minutes: 0.94 (P < 0.001), at 30 minutes: 0.94 (P < 0.001), at 45 minutes: 0.95 (P < 0.001), and for peak IOP: 0.94 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between peak IOP with the GAT and ICare HOME (18.3 ± 4.6 [10-33] and 18.5 ± 5.0 [0-33], respectively, P = 0.533), nor between the delta of fluctuation between basal and peak IOP with the GAT and ICare HOME (3.96 ± 3.22 and 4.54 ± 3.92, P = 0.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated a high agreement between the ICare HOME and the GAT during the WDT in a clinical environment with supervision.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2024.11.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2024.11.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨Icare家用眼压计与Goldmann眼压计(GAT)在饮水试验(WDT)中评估眼压峰值的一致性。设计:前瞻性横断面研究。研究对象:41例开角型青光眼患者79只眼。方法:所有纳入的患者都接受了由眼科专家提供的使用Icare®家用眼压仪的培训课程。然后用Goldmann眼压计(AT900;Haag-Streit;由训练有素的医生(Köniz, suia)进行测量,紧接着由患者进行Icare®家用血压仪(TA022, Icare Oy, Vanda, Finland)测量。根据WDT确定,每个装置进行了四次测量,相差15分钟。主要观察指标:评估两种眼压计测量的峰值眼压的一致性和相关程度。结果:在WDT期间,iCare与Goldmann压血压计之间的一致性很高:两种方法在基线至45 min之间的类内相关系数(r)为0.94 (p < 0.001),在基线时为0.91 (p < 0.001),在15 min时为0.94 (p < 0.001),在30 min时为0.94 (p < 0.001),在45 min时为0.95 (p < 0.001),在IOP峰值时为0.94 (p < 0.001)。GAT和iCare的IOP峰值分别为18.3±4.6(10-33)和18.5±5.0(0-33),差异无统计学意义(p = 0.533); GAT和iCare的基础IOP与峰值的波动δ值分别为3.96±3.22和4.54±3.92,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.054)。结论:我们的研究表明,iCare HOME和Goldmann眼压计在临床环境监督下,在WDT期间具有很高的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agreement between the ICare HOME Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in the Assessment of the Peak Intraocular Pressure in the Water-Drinking Test.

Purpose: To investigate the agreement between the ICare HOME tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) in assessing the peak intraocular pressure (IOP) during the water-drinking test (WDT).

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Subjects: Seventy-nine eyes of 41 open-angle glaucoma patients were included in the study.

Methods: All of the included patients underwent a training session provided by ophthalmologist specialists to use the ICare HOME tonometer. Then the IOP was first measured with the GAT (AT900; Haag-Streit) by a trained physician, immediately followed by ICare HOME tonometer (TA022, ICare Oy) measurement by the patient. Four measurements were taken with each device with 15-minute differences as established by the WDT.

Main outcome measures: The agreement and degree of correlation of the peak IOP by both tonometers were assessed.

Results: The agreement between the ICare HOME and GAT was high during the WDT: the intraclass correlation coefficient (r) between the 2 methods from basal to 45 minutes: 0.94 (P < 0.001), at basal: 0.91 (P < 0.001), at 15 minutes: 0.94 (P < 0.001), at 30 minutes: 0.94 (P < 0.001), at 45 minutes: 0.95 (P < 0.001), and for peak IOP: 0.94 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between peak IOP with the GAT and ICare HOME (18.3 ± 4.6 [10-33] and 18.5 ± 5.0 [0-33], respectively, P = 0.533), nor between the delta of fluctuation between basal and peak IOP with the GAT and ICare HOME (3.96 ± 3.22 and 4.54 ± 3.92, P = 0.054).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a high agreement between the ICare HOME and the GAT during the WDT in a clinical environment with supervision.

Financial disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
期刊最新文献
Influence of Social Determinants of Health on Presentation and Outcomes of Primary Congenital Glaucoma. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hydrus Microstent for patients with mild to moderate Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Canada. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery and the Distal Aqueous Outflow System: The Final Frontier? Patient Challenges with Glaucoma Eye Drops: A Need to Identify Nonadherence and Facilitate Appropriate Support and Disease Management. Lost in the Angle: The Mystery of the Missing XEN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1