外科病人的营养优化:叙述性回顾。

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Advances in Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100351
Olivia Heutlinger , Nischal Acharya , Amanda Tedesco , Ashish Ramesh , Brian Smith , Ninh T Nguyen , Paul E Wischmeyer
{"title":"外科病人的营养优化:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Olivia Heutlinger ,&nbsp;Nischal Acharya ,&nbsp;Amanda Tedesco ,&nbsp;Ashish Ramesh ,&nbsp;Brian Smith ,&nbsp;Ninh T Nguyen ,&nbsp;Paul E Wischmeyer","doi":"10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An increasing body of literature supports the clinical benefit of nutritional assessment and optimization in surgical patients; however, this data has yet to be consolidated in a practical fashion for use by surgeons. In this narrative review, we concisely aggregate emerging data to highlight the role of nutritional optimization as a promising, practical perioperative intervention to reduce complications and improve outcomes in surgical patients. This review of the surgical nutrition literature was conducted via large database review. There were no distinct inclusion/exclusion criteria for this review; however, we focused on adult populations using up-to-date literature from high-quality systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials when available. Current perioperative management focuses on the mitigation of intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications. Well-defined risk calculators attempt to stratify patient surgical risk preoperatively to reduce adverse events directly related to surgical procedures, such as hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary compromise, or infection. However, there is a lack of standardization of prognostic tools, nutritional protocols, and guidelines governing the assessment, composition, and administration of nutritional supplementation. Substantial data exist demonstrating the clinical benefit in the operative setting. In this work, we provide a fundamental primer for surgeons to understand the clinical importance of nutritional optimization along with practical prognostic tools and recommendations for use in their practice. While the extent to which nutritional optimization improves patient outcomes is debatable, the evidence clearly demonstrates a clinically meaningful benefit. Evaluating nutritional status differs based on disease severity and etiology of presentation, thus surgeons must select the appropriate prognostic tools to assess their patients during the perioperative period. This information will catalyze subsequent work with a multidisciplinary team to provide personalized dietary plans for patients and spark research to establish protocols for specific presentations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7349,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nutrition","volume":"16 1","pages":"Article 100351"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nutritional Optimization of the Surgical Patient: A Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Heutlinger ,&nbsp;Nischal Acharya ,&nbsp;Amanda Tedesco ,&nbsp;Ashish Ramesh ,&nbsp;Brian Smith ,&nbsp;Ninh T Nguyen ,&nbsp;Paul E Wischmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>An increasing body of literature supports the clinical benefit of nutritional assessment and optimization in surgical patients; however, this data has yet to be consolidated in a practical fashion for use by surgeons. In this narrative review, we concisely aggregate emerging data to highlight the role of nutritional optimization as a promising, practical perioperative intervention to reduce complications and improve outcomes in surgical patients. This review of the surgical nutrition literature was conducted via large database review. There were no distinct inclusion/exclusion criteria for this review; however, we focused on adult populations using up-to-date literature from high-quality systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials when available. Current perioperative management focuses on the mitigation of intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications. Well-defined risk calculators attempt to stratify patient surgical risk preoperatively to reduce adverse events directly related to surgical procedures, such as hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary compromise, or infection. However, there is a lack of standardization of prognostic tools, nutritional protocols, and guidelines governing the assessment, composition, and administration of nutritional supplementation. Substantial data exist demonstrating the clinical benefit in the operative setting. In this work, we provide a fundamental primer for surgeons to understand the clinical importance of nutritional optimization along with practical prognostic tools and recommendations for use in their practice. While the extent to which nutritional optimization improves patient outcomes is debatable, the evidence clearly demonstrates a clinically meaningful benefit. Evaluating nutritional status differs based on disease severity and etiology of presentation, thus surgeons must select the appropriate prognostic tools to assess their patients during the perioperative period. This information will catalyze subsequent work with a multidisciplinary team to provide personalized dietary plans for patients and spark research to establish protocols for specific presentations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784791/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324001856\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324001856","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的文献支持对外科患者进行营养评估和优化的临床益处;然而,这些数据尚未被外科医生以实用的方式加以巩固。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们简明地汇总了新出现的数据,以强调营养优化作为一种有希望的、实用的围手术期干预措施的作用,以减少手术患者的并发症和改善预后。方法:通过大型数据库对外科营养文献进行叙述性回顾。本综述没有明确的纳入/排除标准,但作者使用来自高质量系统评价或随机对照试验的最新文献关注成人人群。观察:目前围手术期管理的重点是减轻术中和术后立即并发症。定义明确的风险计算器试图在术前对患者手术风险进行分层,以减少与手术直接相关的不良事件,如出血、心肺损害或感染。然而,缺乏标准化的预后工具、营养方案和指导评估、组成和营养补充管理的指南。大量数据证明了手术环境下的临床益处。在这项工作中,我们为外科医生提供了一个基本的入门,以了解营养优化的临床重要性,以及实用的预后工具和在实践中使用的建议。结论:虽然营养优化在多大程度上改善了患者的预后是有争议的,但证据清楚地表明有临床意义的益处。评估营养状况根据疾病严重程度和病因不同而不同,因此外科医生必须选择合适的预后工具来评估围手术期患者。这一信息将促进一个多学科团队的后续工作,为患者提供个性化的饮食计划,并激发研究,为特定的演讲建立协议。意义声明:本综述提供了一个有组织的、集中的参考,外科医生可以回顾围手术期营养的复杂主题,并根据患者的表现获得关键的筛查工具和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nutritional Optimization of the Surgical Patient: A Narrative Review
An increasing body of literature supports the clinical benefit of nutritional assessment and optimization in surgical patients; however, this data has yet to be consolidated in a practical fashion for use by surgeons. In this narrative review, we concisely aggregate emerging data to highlight the role of nutritional optimization as a promising, practical perioperative intervention to reduce complications and improve outcomes in surgical patients. This review of the surgical nutrition literature was conducted via large database review. There were no distinct inclusion/exclusion criteria for this review; however, we focused on adult populations using up-to-date literature from high-quality systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials when available. Current perioperative management focuses on the mitigation of intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications. Well-defined risk calculators attempt to stratify patient surgical risk preoperatively to reduce adverse events directly related to surgical procedures, such as hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary compromise, or infection. However, there is a lack of standardization of prognostic tools, nutritional protocols, and guidelines governing the assessment, composition, and administration of nutritional supplementation. Substantial data exist demonstrating the clinical benefit in the operative setting. In this work, we provide a fundamental primer for surgeons to understand the clinical importance of nutritional optimization along with practical prognostic tools and recommendations for use in their practice. While the extent to which nutritional optimization improves patient outcomes is debatable, the evidence clearly demonstrates a clinically meaningful benefit. Evaluating nutritional status differs based on disease severity and etiology of presentation, thus surgeons must select the appropriate prognostic tools to assess their patients during the perioperative period. This information will catalyze subsequent work with a multidisciplinary team to provide personalized dietary plans for patients and spark research to establish protocols for specific presentations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Nutrition
Advances in Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Advances in Nutrition (AN/Adv Nutr) publishes focused reviews on pivotal findings and recent research across all domains relevant to nutritional scientists and biomedical researchers. This encompasses nutrition-related research spanning biochemical, molecular, and genetic studies using experimental animal models, domestic animals, and human subjects. The journal also emphasizes clinical nutrition, epidemiology and public health, and nutrition education. Review articles concentrate on recent progress rather than broad historical developments. In addition to review articles, AN includes Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and supplements. Supplement proposals require pre-approval by the editor before submission. The journal features reports and position papers from the American Society for Nutrition, summaries of major government and foundation reports, and Nutrient Information briefs providing crucial details about dietary requirements, food sources, deficiencies, and other essential nutrient information. All submissions with scientific content undergo peer review by the Editors or their designees prior to acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review: The Impact of COVID-19 Policy Flexibilities on SNAP and WIC Programmatic Outcomes Gut Microbiota: An Important Participant in Childhood Obesity Beyond Traditional Body Composition Metrics: Load-Capacity Indices Emerge as Predictors of Cardiometabolic Outcomes—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Social Vulnerability and Child Food Insecurity in Developed Countries: A Systematic Review The Optimal Dosage and Duration of ω-3 PUFA Supplementation in Heart Failure Management: Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1