“制作花蕾并推脖子”技术:编织内桥治疗的安全而通用的技术。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110942
Jun Tanabe , Ichiro Nakahara , Shoji Matsumoto , Jun Morioka , Tetsuya Hashimoto , Junpei Koge , Kenichiro Suyama , Takeya Suzuki , Akiko Hasebe , Sadayoshi Watanabe
{"title":"“制作花蕾并推脖子”技术:编织内桥治疗的安全而通用的技术。","authors":"Jun Tanabe ,&nbsp;Ichiro Nakahara ,&nbsp;Shoji Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Jun Morioka ,&nbsp;Tetsuya Hashimoto ,&nbsp;Junpei Koge ,&nbsp;Kenichiro Suyama ,&nbsp;Takeya Suzuki ,&nbsp;Akiko Hasebe ,&nbsp;Sadayoshi Watanabe","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The safety and efficacy of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) treatment has been proven. However, only a few standard techniques for safe and versatile WEB deployment have been described in the literature. In this study, we introduce the “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique to achieve safety and versatility during WEB treatment, referred to simply as the “flower bud” technique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients who underwent WEB treatment between January 2021 and October 2023 were included. We dichotomized the techniques of WEB deployment into two: the “flower bud” technique and the ordinary unsheath technique. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics of the aneurysms, and treatment results were compared between the two techniques to evaluate the safety and versatility of the “flower bud” technique.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 100 aneurysms, 96 were eligible in the study. The “flower bud” technique was applied in 79 aneurysms (82.3 %), and the ordinary unsheath technique was applied in 17 aneurysms (17.7 %). The aneurysm location significantly differed between both techniques. The degree of parent artery-aneurysm (PA) angle and the proportion of the PA angle ≥ 45° were significantly higher in the “flower bud” technique than in the ordinary unsheath technique (P = 0.024 and P = 0.009, respectively). Effective angiographical results and low morbidity/mortality rate were similar in the techniques, although intraoperative rupture was experienced in one aneurysm treated using the ordinary unsheath technique.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique could be safer and more versatile in treating cerebral aneurysms by WEB compared to the ordinary unsheath technique.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 110942"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique: A safe and versatile technique for Woven EndoBridge treatment\",\"authors\":\"Jun Tanabe ,&nbsp;Ichiro Nakahara ,&nbsp;Shoji Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Jun Morioka ,&nbsp;Tetsuya Hashimoto ,&nbsp;Junpei Koge ,&nbsp;Kenichiro Suyama ,&nbsp;Takeya Suzuki ,&nbsp;Akiko Hasebe ,&nbsp;Sadayoshi Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The safety and efficacy of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) treatment has been proven. However, only a few standard techniques for safe and versatile WEB deployment have been described in the literature. In this study, we introduce the “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique to achieve safety and versatility during WEB treatment, referred to simply as the “flower bud” technique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive patients who underwent WEB treatment between January 2021 and October 2023 were included. We dichotomized the techniques of WEB deployment into two: the “flower bud” technique and the ordinary unsheath technique. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics of the aneurysms, and treatment results were compared between the two techniques to evaluate the safety and versatility of the “flower bud” technique.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 100 aneurysms, 96 were eligible in the study. The “flower bud” technique was applied in 79 aneurysms (82.3 %), and the ordinary unsheath technique was applied in 17 aneurysms (17.7 %). The aneurysm location significantly differed between both techniques. The degree of parent artery-aneurysm (PA) angle and the proportion of the PA angle ≥ 45° were significantly higher in the “flower bud” technique than in the ordinary unsheath technique (P = 0.024 and P = 0.009, respectively). Effective angiographical results and low morbidity/mortality rate were similar in the techniques, although intraoperative rupture was experienced in one aneurysm treated using the ordinary unsheath technique.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique could be safer and more versatile in treating cerebral aneurysms by WEB compared to the ordinary unsheath technique.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586824004818\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586824004818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:证实了Woven EndoBridge (WEB)治疗的安全性和有效性。然而,文献中只描述了一些用于安全和通用WEB部署的标准技术。在这项研究中,我们介绍了“制作花蕾并在颈部推”技术,以实现WEB治疗过程中的安全性和通用性,简称“花蕾”技术。方法:纳入2021年1月至2023年10月期间连续接受WEB治疗的患者。我们将WEB部署技术分为两种:“花蕾”技术和普通的脱鞘技术。比较两种技术的患者人口统计、动脉瘤的临床特征和治疗结果,以评估“花苞”技术的安全性和通用性。结果:100个动脉瘤中,96个符合研究条件。“花苞”技术应用于动脉瘤79例(82.3%),普通无鞘技术应用于动脉瘤17例(17.7%)。动脉瘤的位置在两种技术之间有显著差异。“花苞”技术的载瘤动脉-动脉瘤(PA)夹角程度和PA夹角≥45°的比例均显著高于普通无鞘技术(P = 0.024和P = 0.009)。有效的血管造影结果和低发病率/死亡率在技术上是相似的,尽管在术中使用普通的无鞘技术治疗动脉瘤时经历了一次破裂。结论:“造花芽推颈”技术治疗脑动脉瘤比普通开鞘技术更安全、更通用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique: A safe and versatile technique for Woven EndoBridge treatment

Purpose

The safety and efficacy of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) treatment has been proven. However, only a few standard techniques for safe and versatile WEB deployment have been described in the literature. In this study, we introduce the “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique to achieve safety and versatility during WEB treatment, referred to simply as the “flower bud” technique.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent WEB treatment between January 2021 and October 2023 were included. We dichotomized the techniques of WEB deployment into two: the “flower bud” technique and the ordinary unsheath technique. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics of the aneurysms, and treatment results were compared between the two techniques to evaluate the safety and versatility of the “flower bud” technique.

Results

Of 100 aneurysms, 96 were eligible in the study. The “flower bud” technique was applied in 79 aneurysms (82.3 %), and the ordinary unsheath technique was applied in 17 aneurysms (17.7 %). The aneurysm location significantly differed between both techniques. The degree of parent artery-aneurysm (PA) angle and the proportion of the PA angle ≥ 45° were significantly higher in the “flower bud” technique than in the ordinary unsheath technique (P = 0.024 and P = 0.009, respectively). Effective angiographical results and low morbidity/mortality rate were similar in the techniques, although intraoperative rupture was experienced in one aneurysm treated using the ordinary unsheath technique.

Conclusion

The “make a flower bud and push at neck” technique could be safer and more versatile in treating cerebral aneurysms by WEB compared to the ordinary unsheath technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: Enhancing or replacing human expertise? From biomarkers to brain imaging: Refining early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Flow diverter is valid for aneurysms with incorporated branch vessels: Adding coil embolization and incorporated branch vessel diameter are predictors of treatment efficacy. Predictors of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in older adults with TBI and a modified frailty index score Intracranial meningioma with intratumoral hemorrhage: A systematic review of associated features and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1