平均视传播体(MAP) MRI在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的应用:与DTI和NODDI的比较研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Magnetic resonance imaging Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2024.110290
Julia Diamandi, Christian Raimondo, Mahdi Alizadeh, Adam Flanders, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Pascal Jabbour, Robert Rosenwasser, Nikolaos Mouchtouris
{"title":"平均视传播体(MAP) MRI在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的应用:与DTI和NODDI的比较研究。","authors":"Julia Diamandi, Christian Raimondo, Mahdi Alizadeh, Adam Flanders, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Pascal Jabbour, Robert Rosenwasser, Nikolaos Mouchtouris","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2024.110290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the Mean Apparent Propagator (MAP) MRI for processing multi-shell diffusion imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and correlate to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neurite orientation and dispersion density imaging (NODDI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled patients with AIS from 1/2022 to 4/2024 who underwent multi-shell diffusion imaging on a 3.0-Tesla scanner to generate DTI, NODDI and MAP measures. Mean intensity and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for the infarcted regions-of-interest in b0, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), intra-cellular volume fraction (ICVF), free water fraction (FWF), and orientation dispersion index (ODI), return to the origin probability (RTOP), return to the plane probability (RTPP), return to the axis probability (RTAP), propagator anisotropy (PA), q-space Mean Square Displacement (QMSD), and non-Gaussianity (NG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were included with an average age of 69.5 ± 13.5, mean NIHSS of 12.4 ± 7.7, and median infarct of 73.3 ± 10.1 ml. ICVF was correlated with RTPP (ρ = 0.82, p < 0.01), RTAP (ρ = 0.76, p < 0.01) and RTOP (ρ = 0.79, p < 0.01), ODI with PA (ρ = -0.83, p < 0.01), FWF with RTOP (ρ = -0.73, p < 0.01), RTAP (ρ = -0.69, p < 0.01), and RTPP (ρ = -0.73, p < 0.01), MD with RTPP (ρ = -0.80, p < 0.01), RTOP (ρ = -0.79, p < 0.01), and RTAP (ρ = -0.77, p < 0.01), FA with RTAP (ρ = 0.77, p < 0.01), RTOP (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.01), PA (ρ = 0.74, p < 0.01), and SD PA (ρ = 0.85, p < 0.01). Multivariable linear regression identified the SD QMSD (β = 0.406, p = 0.008), thrombectomy (β = 0.481, p = 0.002), and infarct volume (β = 0.292, p = 0.051) as predictive of stroke severity based on NIHSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given its short processing time, MAP MRI is a valuable alternative with potential for clinical use in AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":" ","pages":"110290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A comparative study with DTI and NODDI.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Diamandi, Christian Raimondo, Mahdi Alizadeh, Adam Flanders, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Pascal Jabbour, Robert Rosenwasser, Nikolaos Mouchtouris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mri.2024.110290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the Mean Apparent Propagator (MAP) MRI for processing multi-shell diffusion imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and correlate to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neurite orientation and dispersion density imaging (NODDI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled patients with AIS from 1/2022 to 4/2024 who underwent multi-shell diffusion imaging on a 3.0-Tesla scanner to generate DTI, NODDI and MAP measures. Mean intensity and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for the infarcted regions-of-interest in b0, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), intra-cellular volume fraction (ICVF), free water fraction (FWF), and orientation dispersion index (ODI), return to the origin probability (RTOP), return to the plane probability (RTPP), return to the axis probability (RTAP), propagator anisotropy (PA), q-space Mean Square Displacement (QMSD), and non-Gaussianity (NG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were included with an average age of 69.5 ± 13.5, mean NIHSS of 12.4 ± 7.7, and median infarct of 73.3 ± 10.1 ml. ICVF was correlated with RTPP (ρ = 0.82, p < 0.01), RTAP (ρ = 0.76, p < 0.01) and RTOP (ρ = 0.79, p < 0.01), ODI with PA (ρ = -0.83, p < 0.01), FWF with RTOP (ρ = -0.73, p < 0.01), RTAP (ρ = -0.69, p < 0.01), and RTPP (ρ = -0.73, p < 0.01), MD with RTPP (ρ = -0.80, p < 0.01), RTOP (ρ = -0.79, p < 0.01), and RTAP (ρ = -0.77, p < 0.01), FA with RTAP (ρ = 0.77, p < 0.01), RTOP (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.01), PA (ρ = 0.74, p < 0.01), and SD PA (ρ = 0.85, p < 0.01). Multivariable linear regression identified the SD QMSD (β = 0.406, p = 0.008), thrombectomy (β = 0.481, p = 0.002), and infarct volume (β = 0.292, p = 0.051) as predictive of stroke severity based on NIHSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given its short processing time, MAP MRI is a valuable alternative with potential for clinical use in AIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2024.110290\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2024.110290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价平均表观传播体(MAP) MRI处理急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者多壳弥散成像及其与弥散张量成像(DTI)和神经突定向和弥散密度成像(NODDI)的相关性。方法:我们招募了2022年1月至2024年4月期间患有AIS的患者,他们在3.0特斯拉扫描仪上进行了多壳扩散成像,以产生DTI, NODDI和MAP测量。计算2010年梗死感兴趣区域的平均强度和标准差(SD)、分数各向异性(FA)、平均扩散率(MD)、细胞内体积分数(ICVF)、自由水分数(FWF)和取向色散指数(ODI)、返回原点概率(RTOP)、返回平面概率(RTPP)、返回轴向概率(RTAP)、传播体各向异性(PA)、q空间均方位移(QMSD)和非高斯性(NG)。结果:22例患者平均年龄为69.5 ± 13.5,平均NIHSS为12.4 ± 7.7,中位梗死面积为73.3 ± 10.1 ml。ICVF与RTPP相关(ρ = 0.82,p )结论:由于处理时间短,MAP MRI是一种有价值的替代方法,具有临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A comparative study with DTI and NODDI.

Purpose: To evaluate the Mean Apparent Propagator (MAP) MRI for processing multi-shell diffusion imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and correlate to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neurite orientation and dispersion density imaging (NODDI).

Methods: We enrolled patients with AIS from 1/2022 to 4/2024 who underwent multi-shell diffusion imaging on a 3.0-Tesla scanner to generate DTI, NODDI and MAP measures. Mean intensity and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for the infarcted regions-of-interest in b0, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), intra-cellular volume fraction (ICVF), free water fraction (FWF), and orientation dispersion index (ODI), return to the origin probability (RTOP), return to the plane probability (RTPP), return to the axis probability (RTAP), propagator anisotropy (PA), q-space Mean Square Displacement (QMSD), and non-Gaussianity (NG).

Results: Twenty-two patients were included with an average age of 69.5 ± 13.5, mean NIHSS of 12.4 ± 7.7, and median infarct of 73.3 ± 10.1 ml. ICVF was correlated with RTPP (ρ = 0.82, p < 0.01), RTAP (ρ = 0.76, p < 0.01) and RTOP (ρ = 0.79, p < 0.01), ODI with PA (ρ = -0.83, p < 0.01), FWF with RTOP (ρ = -0.73, p < 0.01), RTAP (ρ = -0.69, p < 0.01), and RTPP (ρ = -0.73, p < 0.01), MD with RTPP (ρ = -0.80, p < 0.01), RTOP (ρ = -0.79, p < 0.01), and RTAP (ρ = -0.77, p < 0.01), FA with RTAP (ρ = 0.77, p < 0.01), RTOP (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.01), PA (ρ = 0.74, p < 0.01), and SD PA (ρ = 0.85, p < 0.01). Multivariable linear regression identified the SD QMSD (β = 0.406, p = 0.008), thrombectomy (β = 0.481, p = 0.002), and infarct volume (β = 0.292, p = 0.051) as predictive of stroke severity based on NIHSS.

Conclusions: Given its short processing time, MAP MRI is a valuable alternative with potential for clinical use in AIS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
期刊最新文献
Preclinical validation of a metasurface-inspired conformal elliptical-cylinder resonator for wrist MRI at 1.5 T P53 status combined with MRI findings for prognosis prediction of single hepatocellular carcinoma Predicting progression in triple-negative breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Insights from peritumoral radiomics. Advanced diffusion-weighted imaging-derived quantitative parameters as biomarkers of fibrosarcoma-cell proliferation in nude mice: A study based on precise imaging-pathology correlation. Association of preoperative MRI with breast cancer treatment and survival: A single institution observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1