卵巢癌肝转移患者预后的nomogram预测方法的开发与验证。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03608-x
Huifu Xiao, Ningping Pan, Guohai Ruan, Qiufen Hao, Jiaojiao Chen
{"title":"卵巢癌肝转移患者预后的nomogram预测方法的开发与验证。","authors":"Huifu Xiao, Ningping Pan, Guohai Ruan, Qiufen Hao, Jiaojiao Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03608-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the overall survival (OS) of ovarian cancer patients with liver metastases (OCLM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study identified 821 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All patients were randomly divided in a ratio of 7:3 into a training cohort (n = 574) and a validation cohort (n = 247). Clinical factors associated with OS were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and backward stepwise regression was applied using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to select the optimal predictor variables. The nomogram for predicting the OS of the OCLM patients was constructed based on the identified prognostic factors. Their prediction ability was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curves analysis (DCA) in both the training and validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified factors that predict OS for OCLM patients and constructed a nomogram based on the data. The ROC, C-index, and calibration analyses indicated that the nomogram performed well over the 1, 2, and 3-year OS in both the training and validation cohorts. Additionally, in contrast to the External model from multiple perspectives, our model shows higher stability and accuracy in predictive power. DCA curves, NRI, and IDI index demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically valuable and superior to the External model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We established and validated a nomogram to predict 1,2- and 3-year OS of OCLM patients, and our results may also be helpful in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"22 1","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting outcomes in ovarian cancer patients with liver metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Huifu Xiao, Ningping Pan, Guohai Ruan, Qiufen Hao, Jiaojiao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12957-024-03608-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the overall survival (OS) of ovarian cancer patients with liver metastases (OCLM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study identified 821 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All patients were randomly divided in a ratio of 7:3 into a training cohort (n = 574) and a validation cohort (n = 247). Clinical factors associated with OS were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and backward stepwise regression was applied using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to select the optimal predictor variables. The nomogram for predicting the OS of the OCLM patients was constructed based on the identified prognostic factors. Their prediction ability was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curves analysis (DCA) in both the training and validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified factors that predict OS for OCLM patients and constructed a nomogram based on the data. The ROC, C-index, and calibration analyses indicated that the nomogram performed well over the 1, 2, and 3-year OS in both the training and validation cohorts. Additionally, in contrast to the External model from multiple perspectives, our model shows higher stability and accuracy in predictive power. DCA curves, NRI, and IDI index demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically valuable and superior to the External model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We established and validated a nomogram to predict 1,2- and 3-year OS of OCLM patients, and our results may also be helpful in clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619217/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03608-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03608-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立并验证预测卵巢癌肝转移患者总生存期(OS)的nomogram。方法:本研究在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中确定了821例患者。所有患者按7:3的比例随机分为训练组(n = 574)和验证组(n = 247)。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析评估与OS相关的临床因素,并采用赤池信息准则(Akaike information criterion, AIC)进行反向逐步回归,选择最佳预测变量。根据确定的预后因素构建预测OCLM患者OS的nomogram。采用一致性指数(C-index)、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校正曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)对训练组和验证组的预测能力进行评价。结果:我们确定了预测OCLM患者OS的因素,并根据数据构建了nomogram。ROC、c -指数和校准分析表明,在训练和验证队列中,nomogram在1年、2年和3年的OS中表现良好。此外,从多个角度与外部模型相比,我们的模型在预测能力上表现出更高的稳定性和准确性。DCA曲线、NRI、IDI指数均显示该nomogram临床价值,优于External model。结论:我们建立并验证了预测OCLM患者1年、2年和3年OS的nomogram,我们的结果也可能有助于临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting outcomes in ovarian cancer patients with liver metastases.

Purpose: To develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the overall survival (OS) of ovarian cancer patients with liver metastases (OCLM).

Methods: This study identified 821 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All patients were randomly divided in a ratio of 7:3 into a training cohort (n = 574) and a validation cohort (n = 247). Clinical factors associated with OS were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and backward stepwise regression was applied using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to select the optimal predictor variables. The nomogram for predicting the OS of the OCLM patients was constructed based on the identified prognostic factors. Their prediction ability was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curves analysis (DCA) in both the training and validation cohorts.

Results: We identified factors that predict OS for OCLM patients and constructed a nomogram based on the data. The ROC, C-index, and calibration analyses indicated that the nomogram performed well over the 1, 2, and 3-year OS in both the training and validation cohorts. Additionally, in contrast to the External model from multiple perspectives, our model shows higher stability and accuracy in predictive power. DCA curves, NRI, and IDI index demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically valuable and superior to the External model.

Conclusion: We established and validated a nomogram to predict 1,2- and 3-year OS of OCLM patients, and our results may also be helpful in clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients: a retrospective, comparative study. Establishing a preoperative predictive model for gallbladder adenoma and cholesterol polyps based on machine learning: a multicentre retrospective study. Division of the inferior pulmonary ligament during upper lobectomy does not improve postoperative pulmonary function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Risk factors for lymphatic leakage following radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Efficacy comparison of optimal natural orifice specimen extraction for robotic middle rectal cancer resection in women: transanal or transvaginal orifice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1