镇静深度对心脏骤停后患者神经系统预后的影响——一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110456
Dawid Leander Staudacher , Laura Heine , Jonathan Rilinger , Alexander Maier , Felix A. Rottmann , Viviane Zotzmann , Klaus Kaier , Paul Marc Biever , Alexander Supady , Dirk Westermann , Tobias Wengenmayer , Markus Jäckel
{"title":"镇静深度对心脏骤停后患者神经系统预后的影响——一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Dawid Leander Staudacher ,&nbsp;Laura Heine ,&nbsp;Jonathan Rilinger ,&nbsp;Alexander Maier ,&nbsp;Felix A. Rottmann ,&nbsp;Viviane Zotzmann ,&nbsp;Klaus Kaier ,&nbsp;Paul Marc Biever ,&nbsp;Alexander Supady ,&nbsp;Dirk Westermann ,&nbsp;Tobias Wengenmayer ,&nbsp;Markus Jäckel","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Whether targeted temperature management (TTM) might improve neurologic prognosis in patients after cardiac arrest is currently under debate. Data concerning sedation depth during TTM is rare. This study aimed to compare the impact of different sedation depths on neurological outcomes in post-cardiac arrest patients undergoing TTM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective, before-and-after registry study, all patients receiving TTM on a medical ICU between 08/2016 and 03/2021 were included. This study evaluated the following sedation targets: RASS-target during TTM −5 until 08/2019 and RASS-target −4 since 09/2019. The primary endpoint was favorable neurological outcome at ICU discharge, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>403 patients were included (RASS-target −5: N = 285; RASS-target −4: N = 118). Favorable neurological outcome was documented in 54/118 (45.8 %) patients in the group with a RASS-target of −4 compared to 111/285 (38.9 %) in the group with a RASS-target of −5. After adjustment for age, sex, initial shockable rhythm, bystander CPR, duration of CPR and mean arterial pressure 12 h after CPR, favorable neurological outcome was associated with RASS-target −4 (OR 1.82 (95 % CI: 1.02–3.23); p = 0.042). ICU survival was similar in both groups while 30-day survival was associated with RASS-target −4 (OR 1.81 (1.01–3.26); p = 0.047).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Lighter sedation strategies during TTM after cardiac arrest might improve outcome and should be further investigated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 110456"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of sedation depth on neurological outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients – A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Dawid Leander Staudacher ,&nbsp;Laura Heine ,&nbsp;Jonathan Rilinger ,&nbsp;Alexander Maier ,&nbsp;Felix A. Rottmann ,&nbsp;Viviane Zotzmann ,&nbsp;Klaus Kaier ,&nbsp;Paul Marc Biever ,&nbsp;Alexander Supady ,&nbsp;Dirk Westermann ,&nbsp;Tobias Wengenmayer ,&nbsp;Markus Jäckel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Whether targeted temperature management (TTM) might improve neurologic prognosis in patients after cardiac arrest is currently under debate. Data concerning sedation depth during TTM is rare. This study aimed to compare the impact of different sedation depths on neurological outcomes in post-cardiac arrest patients undergoing TTM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective, before-and-after registry study, all patients receiving TTM on a medical ICU between 08/2016 and 03/2021 were included. This study evaluated the following sedation targets: RASS-target during TTM −5 until 08/2019 and RASS-target −4 since 09/2019. The primary endpoint was favorable neurological outcome at ICU discharge, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>403 patients were included (RASS-target −5: N = 285; RASS-target −4: N = 118). Favorable neurological outcome was documented in 54/118 (45.8 %) patients in the group with a RASS-target of −4 compared to 111/285 (38.9 %) in the group with a RASS-target of −5. After adjustment for age, sex, initial shockable rhythm, bystander CPR, duration of CPR and mean arterial pressure 12 h after CPR, favorable neurological outcome was associated with RASS-target −4 (OR 1.82 (95 % CI: 1.02–3.23); p = 0.042). ICU survival was similar in both groups while 30-day survival was associated with RASS-target −4 (OR 1.81 (1.01–3.26); p = 0.047).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Lighter sedation strategies during TTM after cardiac arrest might improve outcome and should be further investigated.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"205 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957224008311\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957224008311","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:靶向温度管理(TTM)是否可以改善心脏骤停后患者的神经系统预后目前仍存在争议。关于TTM期间镇静深度的数据很少。本研究旨在比较不同镇静深度对心脏骤停后接受TTM患者神经系统预后的影响。方法:在这项回顾性、前后注册研究中,纳入了2016年8月至2021年3月期间在ICU接受TTM的所有患者。本研究评估了以下镇静靶点:TTM -5至2019年8月期间的ras -target和2019年9月以来的ras -target -4。主要终点是ICU出院时良好的神经系统预后,定义为脑功能分类(CPC)评分为1或2。结果:纳入403例患者(ras -target -5: N = 285;ras -target -4: N = 118)。在rass靶点为-4的组中,54/118(45.8 %)患者的神经系统预后良好,而在rass靶点为-5的组中,111/285(38.9 %)患者的神经系统预后良好。在调整了年龄、性别、初始休克节律、旁观者CPR、CPR持续时间和CPR后平均动脉压12 h后,良好的神经预后与ras -target -4 (OR 1.82(95 % CI: 1.02-3.23)相关; = 0.042页)。两组ICU生存率相似,30天生存率与ras -target -4相关(OR 1.81 (1.01-3.26); = 0.047页)。结论:心搏停止后TTM中较轻的镇静策略可能改善预后,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of sedation depth on neurological outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients – A retrospective cohort study

Aims

Whether targeted temperature management (TTM) might improve neurologic prognosis in patients after cardiac arrest is currently under debate. Data concerning sedation depth during TTM is rare. This study aimed to compare the impact of different sedation depths on neurological outcomes in post-cardiac arrest patients undergoing TTM.

Methods

In this retrospective, before-and-after registry study, all patients receiving TTM on a medical ICU between 08/2016 and 03/2021 were included. This study evaluated the following sedation targets: RASS-target during TTM −5 until 08/2019 and RASS-target −4 since 09/2019. The primary endpoint was favorable neurological outcome at ICU discharge, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2.

Results

403 patients were included (RASS-target −5: N = 285; RASS-target −4: N = 118). Favorable neurological outcome was documented in 54/118 (45.8 %) patients in the group with a RASS-target of −4 compared to 111/285 (38.9 %) in the group with a RASS-target of −5. After adjustment for age, sex, initial shockable rhythm, bystander CPR, duration of CPR and mean arterial pressure 12 h after CPR, favorable neurological outcome was associated with RASS-target −4 (OR 1.82 (95 % CI: 1.02–3.23); p = 0.042). ICU survival was similar in both groups while 30-day survival was associated with RASS-target −4 (OR 1.81 (1.01–3.26); p = 0.047).

Conclusion

Lighter sedation strategies during TTM after cardiac arrest might improve outcome and should be further investigated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Pumping Up Performance: The Hemodynamic Advantages of Automated Head-up Position CPR. Metabolic Profiles Associate with Mortality and Neurological Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients. Saving lives together in sport: - A pilot study attempting to increase the number and availability of automated external defibrillators and to initiate voluntary training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the use of automated external defibrillators in Norwegian amateur football clubs. Use of transoesophageal echocardiography in the pre-hospital setting to determine compression position in out of hospital cardiac arrest. Impact of inhaled sedation on delirium incidence and neurological outcome after cardiac arrest - a propensity-matched control study (Isocare) Reply to Carmona et al. (Volatile sedation for cardiac arrest patients. The question is still unanswered).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1