在健康麻醉机械通气犬的主动脉流速积分测量中,液体刺激后潮末CO2变化作为液体反应性的标志。

Lisa Tarragona, Pablo A Donati, Andrea S Zaccagnini, Alfredo J Díaz, Martín R Ceballos, Nestor M Nigro, Santiago E Fuensalida, Pablo E Otero
{"title":"在健康麻醉机械通气犬的主动脉流速积分测量中,液体刺激后潮末CO2变化作为液体反应性的标志。","authors":"Lisa Tarragona, Pablo A Donati, Andrea S Zaccagnini, Alfredo J Díaz, Martín R Ceballos, Nestor M Nigro, Santiago E Fuensalida, Pablo E Otero","doi":"10.1111/vec.13435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if variation in the end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (∆Petco<sub>2</sub>) after a fluid challenge could predict fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 70% in healthy anesthetized and mechanically ventilated dogs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-seven dogs admitted for neutering.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>To obtain a balanced sample between fluid responder and nonresponder dogs, a 10-mL/kg lactated Ringer's solution was administered over 15 minutes to half of the population before the baseline measurements. All animals then received a fluid challenge of 10 mL/kg lactated Ringer's solution in 5 minutes.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The velocity-time integral of aortic blood flow (VTI<sub>Ao</sub>) was evaluated with Doppler echocardiography before and after a fluid challenge to classify the included dogs as fluid responders or nonresponders. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase of ≥15% of the VTI<sub>Ao</sub> after the fluid challenge. Petco<sub>2</sub> was evaluated at 1, 5, and 10 (T1, T5, T10) minutes after fluid expansion. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis was used to assess the ability of ∆Petco<sub>2</sub> to predict fluid responsiveness at different time points. A total of 13 dogs were fluid responders, and 14 were nonresponders. The best predictive capacity for ∆Petco<sub>2</sub> was observed at T10. The AUROC with its 95% confidence interval (CI) for ∆Petco<sub>2</sub> at T10 was 0.75 (0.56-0.93), with a sensitivity of 84.62% (95% CI, 54.60-98.10), a specificity of 64.29% (95% CI, 35.10-87.20), a positive predictive value of 68.80% (95% CI, 41.30-89.00), and a negative predictive value of 81.80% (95% CI, 48.20-97.70). The optimal cutoff was 1 mm Hg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study showed that, although minimal, ∆Petco<sub>2</sub> predicted fluid responsiveness in the dogs studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":74015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of change in end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> after fluid challenge as a marker of fluid responsiveness as measured by the aortic velocity time integral in healthy anesthetized mechanically ventilated dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Tarragona, Pablo A Donati, Andrea S Zaccagnini, Alfredo J Díaz, Martín R Ceballos, Nestor M Nigro, Santiago E Fuensalida, Pablo E Otero\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vec.13435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if variation in the end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (∆Petco<sub>2</sub>) after a fluid challenge could predict fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 70% in healthy anesthetized and mechanically ventilated dogs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Twenty-seven dogs admitted for neutering.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>To obtain a balanced sample between fluid responder and nonresponder dogs, a 10-mL/kg lactated Ringer's solution was administered over 15 minutes to half of the population before the baseline measurements. All animals then received a fluid challenge of 10 mL/kg lactated Ringer's solution in 5 minutes.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The velocity-time integral of aortic blood flow (VTI<sub>Ao</sub>) was evaluated with Doppler echocardiography before and after a fluid challenge to classify the included dogs as fluid responders or nonresponders. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase of ≥15% of the VTI<sub>Ao</sub> after the fluid challenge. Petco<sub>2</sub> was evaluated at 1, 5, and 10 (T1, T5, T10) minutes after fluid expansion. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis was used to assess the ability of ∆Petco<sub>2</sub> to predict fluid responsiveness at different time points. A total of 13 dogs were fluid responders, and 14 were nonresponders. The best predictive capacity for ∆Petco<sub>2</sub> was observed at T10. The AUROC with its 95% confidence interval (CI) for ∆Petco<sub>2</sub> at T10 was 0.75 (0.56-0.93), with a sensitivity of 84.62% (95% CI, 54.60-98.10), a specificity of 64.29% (95% CI, 35.10-87.20), a positive predictive value of 68.80% (95% CI, 41.30-89.00), and a negative predictive value of 81.80% (95% CI, 48.20-97.70). The optimal cutoff was 1 mm Hg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study showed that, although minimal, ∆Petco<sub>2</sub> predicted fluid responsiveness in the dogs studied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.13435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.13435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价在麻醉和机械通气的健康犬中,液体刺激后潮汐末CO2分压(∆Petco2)的变化是否能以75%的灵敏度和70%的特异性预测液体反应。设计:诊断准确性研究。单位:大学医院。动物:27只狗接受绝育手术。干预措施:为了在有液体反应和无反应的狗之间获得平衡的样本,在基线测量之前,对一半的人群在15分钟内给予10ml /kg乳酸林格溶液。然后,所有动物在5分钟内接受10 mL/kg乳酸林格氏液的液体刺激。测量结果和主要结果:采用多普勒超声心动图评估液体刺激前后主动脉血流速度-时间积分(VTIAo),将纳入的犬分为液体反应或无反应。流体反应性定义为在流体刺激后VTIAo增加≥15%。在液体膨胀后1、5和10分钟(T1、T5、T10)评估Petco2。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分析来评估∆Petco2预测不同时间点流体反应性的能力。总共有13只狗对液体有反应,14只没有反应。在T10时观察到对∆Petco2的最佳预测能力。T10时,∆Petco2的AUROC 95%可信区间(CI)为0.75(0.56 ~ 0.93),敏感性为84.62% (95% CI, 54.60 ~ 98.10),特异性为64.29% (95% CI, 35.10 ~ 87.20),阳性预测值为68.80% (95% CI, 41.30 ~ 89.00),阴性预测值为81.80% (95% CI, 48.20 ~ 97.70)。结论:目前的研究表明,∆Petco2虽然很小,但可以预测所研究犬的液体反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of change in end-tidal CO2 after fluid challenge as a marker of fluid responsiveness as measured by the aortic velocity time integral in healthy anesthetized mechanically ventilated dogs.

Objective: To evaluate if variation in the end-tidal CO2 partial pressure (∆Petco2) after a fluid challenge could predict fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 70% in healthy anesthetized and mechanically ventilated dogs.

Design: Diagnostic accuracy study.

Setting: University hospital.

Animals: Twenty-seven dogs admitted for neutering.

Interventions: To obtain a balanced sample between fluid responder and nonresponder dogs, a 10-mL/kg lactated Ringer's solution was administered over 15 minutes to half of the population before the baseline measurements. All animals then received a fluid challenge of 10 mL/kg lactated Ringer's solution in 5 minutes.

Measurements and main results: The velocity-time integral of aortic blood flow (VTIAo) was evaluated with Doppler echocardiography before and after a fluid challenge to classify the included dogs as fluid responders or nonresponders. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase of ≥15% of the VTIAo after the fluid challenge. Petco2 was evaluated at 1, 5, and 10 (T1, T5, T10) minutes after fluid expansion. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis was used to assess the ability of ∆Petco2 to predict fluid responsiveness at different time points. A total of 13 dogs were fluid responders, and 14 were nonresponders. The best predictive capacity for ∆Petco2 was observed at T10. The AUROC with its 95% confidence interval (CI) for ∆Petco2 at T10 was 0.75 (0.56-0.93), with a sensitivity of 84.62% (95% CI, 54.60-98.10), a specificity of 64.29% (95% CI, 35.10-87.20), a positive predictive value of 68.80% (95% CI, 41.30-89.00), and a negative predictive value of 81.80% (95% CI, 48.20-97.70). The optimal cutoff was 1 mm Hg.

Conclusions: The current study showed that, although minimal, ∆Petco2 predicted fluid responsiveness in the dogs studied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abdominal fluid score as a predictor of transfusion needs and outcome in cats following trauma. A novel approach to decannulation of a tracheostomy tube using a 1-way speaking valve after upper airway trauma in 2 dogs. An exploratory study on the effect of rescuer team size on basic and advanced life support technical skills in a high-fidelity simulation of canine cardiopulmonary arrest. Assessment of shock index in healthy cats and in cats presenting to an emergency room with shock. Determination of reference intervals of venous blood gas and acid-base parameters in clinically healthy awake cats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1