1975-2020年预防、筛查和治疗所避免的癌症死亡估计

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JAMA Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5381
Katrina A. B. Goddard, Eric J. Feuer, Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Rafael Meza, Theodore R. Holford, Jihyoun Jeon, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Roman Gulati, Natasha K. Stout, Nadia Howlader, Amy B. Knudsen, Daniel Miller, Jennifer L. Caswell-Jin, Clyde B. Schechter, Ruth Etzioni, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Allison W. Kurian, Sylvia K. Plevritis, John M. Hampton, Sarah Stein, Liyang P. Sun, Asad Umar, Philip E. Castle
{"title":"1975-2020年预防、筛查和治疗所避免的癌症死亡估计","authors":"Katrina A. B. Goddard, Eric J. Feuer, Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Rafael Meza, Theodore R. Holford, Jihyoun Jeon, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Roman Gulati, Natasha K. Stout, Nadia Howlader, Amy B. Knudsen, Daniel Miller, Jennifer L. Caswell-Jin, Clyde B. Schechter, Ruth Etzioni, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Allison W. Kurian, Sylvia K. Plevritis, John M. Hampton, Sarah Stein, Liyang P. Sun, Asad Umar, Philip E. Castle","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceCancer mortality has decreased over time, but the contributions of different interventions across the cancer control continuum to averting cancer deaths have not been systematically evaluated across major cancer sites.ObjectiveTo quantify the contributions of prevention, screening (to remove precursors [interception] or early detection), and treatment to cumulative number of cancer deaths averted from 1975 to 2020 for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this model-based study using population-level cancer mortality data, outputs from published models developed by the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network were extended to quantify cancer deaths averted through 2020. Model inputs were based on national data on risk factors, cancer incidence, cancer survival, and mortality due to other causes, and dissemination and effects of prevention, screening (for interception and early detection), and treatment. Simulated or modeled data using parameters derived from multiple birth cohorts of the US population were used.InterventionsPrimary prevention via smoking reduction (lung), screening for interception (cervix and colorectal) or early detection (breast, cervix, colorectal, and prostate), and therapy (breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe estimated cumulative number of cancer deaths averted with interventions vs no advances.ResultsAn estimated 5.94 million cancer deaths were averted for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers combined. Cancer prevention and screening efforts averted 8 of 10 of these deaths (4.75 million averted deaths). The contribution of each intervention varied by cancer site. Screening accounted for 25% of breast cancer deaths averted. Averted cervical cancer deaths were nearly completely averted through screening and removal of cancer precursors as treatment advances were modest during the study period. Averted colorectal cancer deaths were averted because of screening and removal of precancerous polyps or early detection in 79% and treatment advances in 21%. Most lung cancer deaths were avoided by smoking reduction (98%) because screening uptake was low and treatment largely palliative before 2014. Screening contributed to 56% of averted prostate cancer deaths.Conclusions and RelevanceOver the past 45 years, cancer prevention and screening accounted for most cancer deaths averted for these causes; however, their contribution varied by cancer site according to these models using population-level cancer mortality data. Despite progress, efforts to reduce the US cancer burden will require increased dissemination of effective interventions and new technologies and discoveries.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Cancer Deaths Averted From Prevention, Screening, and Treatment Efforts, 1975-2020\",\"authors\":\"Katrina A. B. Goddard, Eric J. Feuer, Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Rafael Meza, Theodore R. Holford, Jihyoun Jeon, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Roman Gulati, Natasha K. Stout, Nadia Howlader, Amy B. Knudsen, Daniel Miller, Jennifer L. Caswell-Jin, Clyde B. Schechter, Ruth Etzioni, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Allison W. Kurian, Sylvia K. Plevritis, John M. Hampton, Sarah Stein, Liyang P. Sun, Asad Umar, Philip E. Castle\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportanceCancer mortality has decreased over time, but the contributions of different interventions across the cancer control continuum to averting cancer deaths have not been systematically evaluated across major cancer sites.ObjectiveTo quantify the contributions of prevention, screening (to remove precursors [interception] or early detection), and treatment to cumulative number of cancer deaths averted from 1975 to 2020 for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this model-based study using population-level cancer mortality data, outputs from published models developed by the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network were extended to quantify cancer deaths averted through 2020. Model inputs were based on national data on risk factors, cancer incidence, cancer survival, and mortality due to other causes, and dissemination and effects of prevention, screening (for interception and early detection), and treatment. Simulated or modeled data using parameters derived from multiple birth cohorts of the US population were used.InterventionsPrimary prevention via smoking reduction (lung), screening for interception (cervix and colorectal) or early detection (breast, cervix, colorectal, and prostate), and therapy (breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe estimated cumulative number of cancer deaths averted with interventions vs no advances.ResultsAn estimated 5.94 million cancer deaths were averted for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers combined. Cancer prevention and screening efforts averted 8 of 10 of these deaths (4.75 million averted deaths). The contribution of each intervention varied by cancer site. Screening accounted for 25% of breast cancer deaths averted. Averted cervical cancer deaths were nearly completely averted through screening and removal of cancer precursors as treatment advances were modest during the study period. Averted colorectal cancer deaths were averted because of screening and removal of precancerous polyps or early detection in 79% and treatment advances in 21%. Most lung cancer deaths were avoided by smoking reduction (98%) because screening uptake was low and treatment largely palliative before 2014. Screening contributed to 56% of averted prostate cancer deaths.Conclusions and RelevanceOver the past 45 years, cancer prevention and screening accounted for most cancer deaths averted for these causes; however, their contribution varied by cancer site according to these models using population-level cancer mortality data. Despite progress, efforts to reduce the US cancer burden will require increased dissemination of effective interventions and new technologies and discoveries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":22.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5381\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5381","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癌症死亡率随着时间的推移而下降,但在癌症控制连续体中不同干预措施对避免癌症死亡的贡献尚未在主要癌症部位进行系统评估。目的量化预防、筛查(去除前体[拦截]或早期发现)和治疗对1975年至2020年乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌累计避免的癌症死亡人数的贡献。设计、环境和参与者在这项使用人口水平癌症死亡率数据的基于模型的研究中,癌症干预和监测建模网络开发的已发表模型的输出被扩展到量化到2020年避免的癌症死亡。模型输入基于以下方面的国家数据:风险因素、癌症发病率、癌症存活率和其他原因导致的死亡率,以及预防、筛查(用于拦截和早期发现)和治疗的传播和效果。使用来自美国人口多胞胎队列的参数模拟或建模数据。干预措施:通过减少吸烟(肺)、筛查(宫颈和结肠)或早期检测(乳腺、宫颈、结肠和前列腺)和治疗(乳腺、结肠、肺和前列腺)进行一级预防。主要结局和措施干预措施避免的癌症死亡人数与无进展的估计累积人数。结果估计594万例乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌的死亡总数得以避免。癌症预防和筛查工作避免了其中10例死亡中的8例(避免了475万例死亡)。每种干预措施的作用因癌症部位而异。筛查占避免乳腺癌死亡的25%。由于在研究期间治疗进展缓慢,通过筛查和清除癌症前体几乎完全避免了宫颈癌死亡。避免结直肠癌死亡的原因是筛查和切除癌前息肉或早期发现(79%)和治疗进展(21%)。大多数肺癌死亡是通过减少吸烟(98%)避免的,因为2014年之前筛查率低,治疗主要是姑息性的。筛查有助于56%的前列腺癌避免死亡。结论和相关性在过去的45年里,癌症预防和筛查是避免癌症死亡的主要原因;然而,根据这些使用人口水平癌症死亡率数据的模型,它们的贡献因癌症部位而异。尽管取得了进展,但减少美国癌症负担的努力将需要更多地传播有效的干预措施以及新技术和新发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of Cancer Deaths Averted From Prevention, Screening, and Treatment Efforts, 1975-2020
ImportanceCancer mortality has decreased over time, but the contributions of different interventions across the cancer control continuum to averting cancer deaths have not been systematically evaluated across major cancer sites.ObjectiveTo quantify the contributions of prevention, screening (to remove precursors [interception] or early detection), and treatment to cumulative number of cancer deaths averted from 1975 to 2020 for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this model-based study using population-level cancer mortality data, outputs from published models developed by the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network were extended to quantify cancer deaths averted through 2020. Model inputs were based on national data on risk factors, cancer incidence, cancer survival, and mortality due to other causes, and dissemination and effects of prevention, screening (for interception and early detection), and treatment. Simulated or modeled data using parameters derived from multiple birth cohorts of the US population were used.InterventionsPrimary prevention via smoking reduction (lung), screening for interception (cervix and colorectal) or early detection (breast, cervix, colorectal, and prostate), and therapy (breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe estimated cumulative number of cancer deaths averted with interventions vs no advances.ResultsAn estimated 5.94 million cancer deaths were averted for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers combined. Cancer prevention and screening efforts averted 8 of 10 of these deaths (4.75 million averted deaths). The contribution of each intervention varied by cancer site. Screening accounted for 25% of breast cancer deaths averted. Averted cervical cancer deaths were nearly completely averted through screening and removal of cancer precursors as treatment advances were modest during the study period. Averted colorectal cancer deaths were averted because of screening and removal of precancerous polyps or early detection in 79% and treatment advances in 21%. Most lung cancer deaths were avoided by smoking reduction (98%) because screening uptake was low and treatment largely palliative before 2014. Screening contributed to 56% of averted prostate cancer deaths.Conclusions and RelevanceOver the past 45 years, cancer prevention and screening accounted for most cancer deaths averted for these causes; however, their contribution varied by cancer site according to these models using population-level cancer mortality data. Despite progress, efforts to reduce the US cancer burden will require increased dissemination of effective interventions and new technologies and discoveries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Oncology
JAMA Oncology Medicine-Oncology
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: JAMA Oncology is an international peer-reviewed journal that serves as the leading publication for scientists, clinicians, and trainees working in the field of oncology. It is part of the JAMA Network, a collection of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Intratumoral Injection of mRNA-2752 and Pembrolizumab for High-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Incidence by Sex and Age in the US Overcoming Barriers to Make Patient-Reported Outcome Collection the Standard of Care in Oncology. Biomarker-Directed Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review. Genetic Ancestry–Based Differences in Biomarker-Based Eligibility for Precision Oncology Therapies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1