为异源肽的生产开辟道路:切割策略的概述。

IF 4.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002
Karen Ofuji Osiro , Harry Morales Duque , Kamila Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira , Nadielle Tamires Moreira Melo , Letícia Ferreira Lima , Hugo Costa Paes , Octavio Luiz Franco
{"title":"为异源肽的生产开辟道路:切割策略的概述。","authors":"Karen Ofuji Osiro ,&nbsp;Harry Morales Duque ,&nbsp;Kamila Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Nadielle Tamires Moreira Melo ,&nbsp;Letícia Ferreira Lima ,&nbsp;Hugo Costa Paes ,&nbsp;Octavio Luiz Franco","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>One of the main bottlenecks for recombinant peptide production is choosing the proper cleavage method to remove fusion protein tags from target peptides. While these tags are crucial for inhibiting the activity of the target peptide during heterologous expression, incorporating a cleavage site is essential for their later removal, ensuring the pure sequencing of the peptide. This review evaluates different cleavage methods, including protease-mediated, self-cleavable protein, and chemical-mediated sites, regarding their advantages and limitations. For instance, intein, N<sup>pro</sup> EDDIE, enterokinase, factor Xa, SUMO, and CNBr are options for residue-free cleavage. Although protease-mediated cleavage is widely used, it can be expensive, due to its own cost added to the whole process. As an alternative, self-cleavable sites eliminate the requirement for proteinases. Another crucial step in defining the proper cleavage method is cost consideration, which relates to the purpose of peptide production. Here, we explore a range of cleavage approaches, meeting the needs of both cost-constrained applications and a more flexible budget. Overall, selecting the most suitable cleavage method should be based on careful consideration of toxicity, cost, accuracy, and specific application requirements to ensure a state-of-the-art approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":"234 ","pages":"Pages 36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cleaving the way for heterologous peptide production: An overview of cleavage strategies\",\"authors\":\"Karen Ofuji Osiro ,&nbsp;Harry Morales Duque ,&nbsp;Kamila Botelho Sampaio de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Nadielle Tamires Moreira Melo ,&nbsp;Letícia Ferreira Lima ,&nbsp;Hugo Costa Paes ,&nbsp;Octavio Luiz Franco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>One of the main bottlenecks for recombinant peptide production is choosing the proper cleavage method to remove fusion protein tags from target peptides. While these tags are crucial for inhibiting the activity of the target peptide during heterologous expression, incorporating a cleavage site is essential for their later removal, ensuring the pure sequencing of the peptide. This review evaluates different cleavage methods, including protease-mediated, self-cleavable protein, and chemical-mediated sites, regarding their advantages and limitations. For instance, intein, N<sup>pro</sup> EDDIE, enterokinase, factor Xa, SUMO, and CNBr are options for residue-free cleavage. Although protease-mediated cleavage is widely used, it can be expensive, due to its own cost added to the whole process. As an alternative, self-cleavable sites eliminate the requirement for proteinases. Another crucial step in defining the proper cleavage method is cost consideration, which relates to the purpose of peptide production. Here, we explore a range of cleavage approaches, meeting the needs of both cost-constrained applications and a more flexible budget. Overall, selecting the most suitable cleavage method should be based on careful consideration of toxicity, cost, accuracy, and specific application requirements to ensure a state-of-the-art approach.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods\",\"volume\":\"234 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 36-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202324002615\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202324002615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择合适的切割方法去除融合蛋白标签是重组肽生产的主要瓶颈之一。虽然这些标签在异源表达过程中对抑制目标肽的活性至关重要,但结合切割位点对于随后去除它们是必不可少的,以确保肽的纯测序。本文综述了不同的切割方法,包括蛋白酶介导、自切割蛋白和化学介导位点,以及它们的优点和局限性。例如,干扰素,nproeddie,肠激酶,因子Xa, SUMO和CNBr都是无残基切割的选择。虽然蛋白酶介导的裂解被广泛使用,但由于其本身的成本增加到整个过程中,它可能是昂贵的。作为一种选择,自切割位点消除了对蛋白酶的需求。在确定合适的切割方法的另一个关键步骤是成本考虑,这涉及到肽生产的目的。在这里,我们探索了一系列切割方法,以满足成本限制应用程序和更灵活的预算的需求。总的来说,选择最合适的解理方法应该基于仔细考虑毒性,成本,准确性和特定的应用要求,以确保最先进的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cleaving the way for heterologous peptide production: An overview of cleavage strategies
One of the main bottlenecks for recombinant peptide production is choosing the proper cleavage method to remove fusion protein tags from target peptides. While these tags are crucial for inhibiting the activity of the target peptide during heterologous expression, incorporating a cleavage site is essential for their later removal, ensuring the pure sequencing of the peptide. This review evaluates different cleavage methods, including protease-mediated, self-cleavable protein, and chemical-mediated sites, regarding their advantages and limitations. For instance, intein, Npro EDDIE, enterokinase, factor Xa, SUMO, and CNBr are options for residue-free cleavage. Although protease-mediated cleavage is widely used, it can be expensive, due to its own cost added to the whole process. As an alternative, self-cleavable sites eliminate the requirement for proteinases. Another crucial step in defining the proper cleavage method is cost consideration, which relates to the purpose of peptide production. Here, we explore a range of cleavage approaches, meeting the needs of both cost-constrained applications and a more flexible budget. Overall, selecting the most suitable cleavage method should be based on careful consideration of toxicity, cost, accuracy, and specific application requirements to ensure a state-of-the-art approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods
Methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences. Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.
期刊最新文献
Latest trends & strategies in ocular drug delivery A high sensitivity assay of UBE3A ubiquitin ligase activity HybProm: An attention-assisted hybrid CNN-BiLSTM model for the interpretable prediction of DNA promoter A transferability-guided protein-ligand interaction prediction method ZFP-CanPred: Predicting the effect of mutations in zinc-finger proteins in cancers using protein language models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1