体外光疗预防肺移植后排斥反应的前瞻性随机对照试验。

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1183/13993003.00733-2024
Alberto Benazzo, Ara Cho, Sophia Auner, Stefan Schwarz, Zsofia Kovacs, Dariga Ramazanova, Vera Kolovratova, Manuela Branka, Gabriela Muraközy, Elisabeth Hielle-Wittmann, Clemens Aigner, Konrad Hoetzenecker, Thomas Wekerle, Nina Worel, Robert Knobler, Peter Jaksch
{"title":"体外光疗预防肺移植后排斥反应的前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Alberto Benazzo, Ara Cho, Sophia Auner, Stefan Schwarz, Zsofia Kovacs, Dariga Ramazanova, Vera Kolovratova, Manuela Branka, Gabriela Muraközy, Elisabeth Hielle-Wittmann, Clemens Aigner, Konrad Hoetzenecker, Thomas Wekerle, Nina Worel, Robert Knobler, Peter Jaksch","doi":"10.1183/13993003.00733-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Lung transplant recipients have the worst long-term outcomes of all solid organs due to acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of ECP as a prophylactic treatment to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR), CMV infections and reduce the risk of CLAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at Medical University of Vienna between 2018 and 2020. It included 31 COPD recipients per group. Treatment group underwent extracorporeal photopheresis in addition to standard triple-drug immunosuppression protocol after lung transplantation. Control group received standard triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy. The primary outcome was a composite outcome defined as incidence of high-grade ACR, CMV infection or CLAD within 24 months after lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the control group, 19 patients (61.3%) achieved the primary combined endpoint, compared with only 6 patients (19.4%) in the treatment group (p<0.001). Freedom from high-grade ACR was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.045). Cumulative A scores were significantly lower in the ECP group than in the control group at 3 months (0.18±0.44 <i>versus</i> 0.56±0.94, p<0.05) and at 12 months (0.25±0.48 <i>versus</i> 1.0±1.45, p=0.002). The rate of infections was lower in the ECP group with 5 cases and 67 cumulative hospital days compared to 22 cases and 309 days in the control group (p=0.002). Freedom from CLAD at three years was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding ECP to standard triple immunosuppression resulted in a significant reduction of the number of ACR episodes and significantly lower incidence of CLAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal Photopheresis for the prevention of rejection after lung transplantation - a prospective randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Benazzo, Ara Cho, Sophia Auner, Stefan Schwarz, Zsofia Kovacs, Dariga Ramazanova, Vera Kolovratova, Manuela Branka, Gabriela Muraközy, Elisabeth Hielle-Wittmann, Clemens Aigner, Konrad Hoetzenecker, Thomas Wekerle, Nina Worel, Robert Knobler, Peter Jaksch\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.00733-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Lung transplant recipients have the worst long-term outcomes of all solid organs due to acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of ECP as a prophylactic treatment to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR), CMV infections and reduce the risk of CLAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at Medical University of Vienna between 2018 and 2020. It included 31 COPD recipients per group. Treatment group underwent extracorporeal photopheresis in addition to standard triple-drug immunosuppression protocol after lung transplantation. Control group received standard triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy. The primary outcome was a composite outcome defined as incidence of high-grade ACR, CMV infection or CLAD within 24 months after lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the control group, 19 patients (61.3%) achieved the primary combined endpoint, compared with only 6 patients (19.4%) in the treatment group (p<0.001). Freedom from high-grade ACR was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.045). Cumulative A scores were significantly lower in the ECP group than in the control group at 3 months (0.18±0.44 <i>versus</i> 0.56±0.94, p<0.05) and at 12 months (0.25±0.48 <i>versus</i> 1.0±1.45, p=0.002). The rate of infections was lower in the ECP group with 5 cases and 67 cumulative hospital days compared to 22 cases and 309 days in the control group (p=0.002). Freedom from CLAD at three years was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding ECP to standard triple immunosuppression resulted in a significant reduction of the number of ACR episodes and significantly lower incidence of CLAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00733-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00733-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:由于急性排斥反应和慢性肺同种异体移植功能障碍(CLAD),肺移植受者是所有实体器官中长期预后最差的。目的:探讨ECP作为预防急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)、巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染和降低慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLAD)风险的预防性治疗方法的疗效。方法:2018 - 2020年在维也纳医科大学进行单中心前瞻性随机对照试验。每组包括31名COPD患者。治疗组肺移植术后在标准三联免疫抑制方案的基础上进行体外光移植术。对照组接受标准三联免疫抑制治疗。主要终点是一个复合终点,定义为肺移植后24个月内高级ACR、CMV感染或CLAD的发生率。结果:对照组19例(61.3%)患者达到主要联合终点,而治疗组仅有6例(19.4%)患者达到主要联合终点(vs . 0.56±0.94,vs . 1.0±1.45,p=0.002)。ECP组感染发生率为5例,67天,对照组为22例,309天(p=0.002)。ECP组在3年时的CLAD自由度显著高于ECP组(p=0.015)。结论:在标准三联免疫抑制中加入ECP可显著减少ACR发作次数,显著降低CLAD发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extracorporeal Photopheresis for the prevention of rejection after lung transplantation - a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Rationale: Lung transplant recipients have the worst long-term outcomes of all solid organs due to acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD).

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of ECP as a prophylactic treatment to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR), CMV infections and reduce the risk of CLAD.

Methods: Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at Medical University of Vienna between 2018 and 2020. It included 31 COPD recipients per group. Treatment group underwent extracorporeal photopheresis in addition to standard triple-drug immunosuppression protocol after lung transplantation. Control group received standard triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy. The primary outcome was a composite outcome defined as incidence of high-grade ACR, CMV infection or CLAD within 24 months after lung transplantation.

Results: In the control group, 19 patients (61.3%) achieved the primary combined endpoint, compared with only 6 patients (19.4%) in the treatment group (p<0.001). Freedom from high-grade ACR was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.045). Cumulative A scores were significantly lower in the ECP group than in the control group at 3 months (0.18±0.44 versus 0.56±0.94, p<0.05) and at 12 months (0.25±0.48 versus 1.0±1.45, p=0.002). The rate of infections was lower in the ECP group with 5 cases and 67 cumulative hospital days compared to 22 cases and 309 days in the control group (p=0.002). Freedom from CLAD at three years was significantly greater in the ECP group (p=0.015).

Conclusion: Adding ECP to standard triple immunosuppression resulted in a significant reduction of the number of ACR episodes and significantly lower incidence of CLAD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
期刊最新文献
The blood transcriptional response in patients developing intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia. Respiratory support and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants born at 22-26 weeks gestation in Sweden, 2004-2007 and 2014-2016. Viewpoint: defining adherence phenotype and endotypes to personalise asthma management. Widening the selection criteria for lung volume reduction surgery. Nasal CPAP increases alveolar number in a rhesus monkey model of moderate prematurity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1