修订的快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分(RqSOFA)预测通过救护车就诊的急诊科患者的院内死亡率的特点:一项观察性队列研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal and Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1007/s11739-024-03833-y
Yohei Kamikawa, Hiroyuki Hayashi, Jeffrey N Bone, Ran D Goldman
{"title":"修订的快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分(RqSOFA)预测通过救护车就诊的急诊科患者的院内死亡率的特点:一项观察性队列研究","authors":"Yohei Kamikawa, Hiroyuki Hayashi, Jeffrey N Bone, Ran D Goldman","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03833-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and modified qSOFA (MqSOFA) are scoring systems that rely on vital signs. However, NEWS is time-consuming, qSOFA has low sensitivity, and MqSOFA includes a difficult calculation. To address these issues, we developed the Revised qSOFA score (RqSOFA) that consists of percutaneous oxygen saturation, oxygen usage, Simple Shock Index, and the parameters of qSOFA. The predictability of RqSOFA was examined for in-hospital mortality among patients who were transported by ambulance. This observational cohort study included all patients transported via ambulance to an Emergency Department between 2019 and 2021. Patients who had prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest, were pregnant, were younger than 15 years old, arrived from another hospital, and had missing data were excluded. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of RqSOFA, as well as its sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point, were determined and compared to those of qSOFA, NEWS and MqSOFA. Among 1849 included patients, 53 died in the hospital. The AUROC for RqSOFA was 0.867 and the optimal cut-off point was 2. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.849 and 0.802, respectively. The AUROC of RqSOFA was larger than qSOFA but had no significance with NEWS and MqSOFA. RqSOFA exhibited the same sensitivity and better specificity compared to NEWS. There were no differences in sensitivity and specificity between RqSOFA and MqSOFA. In conclusion, RqSOFA exhibited superior predictability for in-hospital mortality to qSOFA and NEWS, while offering similar predictability to MqSOFA despite relying only on simple measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of a revised quick sequential organ failure assessment score (RqSOFA) to predict in-hospital mortality of patients visiting the emergency department via ambulance: an observational cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yohei Kamikawa, Hiroyuki Hayashi, Jeffrey N Bone, Ran D Goldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-024-03833-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and modified qSOFA (MqSOFA) are scoring systems that rely on vital signs. However, NEWS is time-consuming, qSOFA has low sensitivity, and MqSOFA includes a difficult calculation. To address these issues, we developed the Revised qSOFA score (RqSOFA) that consists of percutaneous oxygen saturation, oxygen usage, Simple Shock Index, and the parameters of qSOFA. The predictability of RqSOFA was examined for in-hospital mortality among patients who were transported by ambulance. This observational cohort study included all patients transported via ambulance to an Emergency Department between 2019 and 2021. Patients who had prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest, were pregnant, were younger than 15 years old, arrived from another hospital, and had missing data were excluded. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of RqSOFA, as well as its sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point, were determined and compared to those of qSOFA, NEWS and MqSOFA. Among 1849 included patients, 53 died in the hospital. The AUROC for RqSOFA was 0.867 and the optimal cut-off point was 2. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.849 and 0.802, respectively. The AUROC of RqSOFA was larger than qSOFA but had no significance with NEWS and MqSOFA. RqSOFA exhibited the same sensitivity and better specificity compared to NEWS. There were no differences in sensitivity and specificity between RqSOFA and MqSOFA. In conclusion, RqSOFA exhibited superior predictability for in-hospital mortality to qSOFA and NEWS, while offering similar predictability to MqSOFA despite relying only on simple measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03833-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03833-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家早期预警评分(NEWS)、快速顺序器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)和改进的qSOFA (MqSOFA)是依赖生命体征的评分系统。但是,NEWS非常耗时,qSOFA灵敏度低,并且MqSOFA包含一个难以计算的问题。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了修订后的qSOFA评分(RqSOFA),该评分由经皮氧饱和度、氧用量、简单休克指数和qSOFA参数组成。研究了RqSOFA对救护车运送患者住院死亡率的可预测性。这项观察性队列研究包括2019年至2021年间通过救护车送往急诊室的所有患者。排除院前心肺骤停、怀孕、年龄小于15岁、来自其他医院且数据缺失的患者。测定RqSOFA的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)及其在最佳截断点处的敏感性和特异性,并与qSOFA、NEWS和MqSOFA进行比较。在纳入的1849名患者中,53人死于医院。RqSOFA的AUROC为0.867,最佳截断点为2。敏感性为0.849,特异性为0.802。RqSOFA的AUROC大于qSOFA,但与NEWS和MqSOFA无显著性差异。与NEWS相比,RqSOFA具有相同的敏感性和更好的特异性。RqSOFA与MqSOFA的敏感性和特异性均无差异。总之,RqSOFA对院内死亡率的可预测性优于qSOFA和NEWS,尽管仅依赖于简单的测量,但与MqSOFA具有相似的可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics of a revised quick sequential organ failure assessment score (RqSOFA) to predict in-hospital mortality of patients visiting the emergency department via ambulance: an observational cohort study.

The National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and modified qSOFA (MqSOFA) are scoring systems that rely on vital signs. However, NEWS is time-consuming, qSOFA has low sensitivity, and MqSOFA includes a difficult calculation. To address these issues, we developed the Revised qSOFA score (RqSOFA) that consists of percutaneous oxygen saturation, oxygen usage, Simple Shock Index, and the parameters of qSOFA. The predictability of RqSOFA was examined for in-hospital mortality among patients who were transported by ambulance. This observational cohort study included all patients transported via ambulance to an Emergency Department between 2019 and 2021. Patients who had prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest, were pregnant, were younger than 15 years old, arrived from another hospital, and had missing data were excluded. The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of RqSOFA, as well as its sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point, were determined and compared to those of qSOFA, NEWS and MqSOFA. Among 1849 included patients, 53 died in the hospital. The AUROC for RqSOFA was 0.867 and the optimal cut-off point was 2. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.849 and 0.802, respectively. The AUROC of RqSOFA was larger than qSOFA but had no significance with NEWS and MqSOFA. RqSOFA exhibited the same sensitivity and better specificity compared to NEWS. There were no differences in sensitivity and specificity between RqSOFA and MqSOFA. In conclusion, RqSOFA exhibited superior predictability for in-hospital mortality to qSOFA and NEWS, while offering similar predictability to MqSOFA despite relying only on simple measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Lower albumin levels are associated with 1-year mortality in older patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: THE ALBIMED-HF study. Cytisine for smoking cessation in hospitalised smokers with cardiovascular diseases: an observational study. Severe burn injuries and the impact of mental health: insights from 7 years at Switzerland's leading burn center. Comanagement of surgical patients between neurosurgeons and internal-medicine clinicians: observational cohort study. Linezolid-induced neuropathy in Nocardia pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1