{"title":"急性失代偿性心衰患者静脉注射布美他尼与速尿的尿量反应比较:观察性分析。","authors":"Emily Kefer, Brian Gulbis, Phillip Weeks","doi":"10.1097/FJC.0000000000001658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loop diuretics are a fundamental cornerstone in management of hypervolemia encountered in acute decompensated heart failure. There is variation in literature describing relative potency of loop diuretic agents, and very limited available data specific to the heart failure population. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare the urine output response between intravenous furosemide and bumetanide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were admitted between July 1, 2021 and June 30, 2022, with acute decompensated heart failure and received intravenous bumetanide or furosemide within 48 hours of admission. Propensity matching was utilized to determine comparison groups. The primary outcome was total urine output for 24 hours following initiation of the diuretic regimen. A total of 120 patients (60 in each group) were matched after exclusion criteria were applied. The total urine output was similar between groups. The bumetanide group did demonstrate a greater urine output: furosemide equivalent response (52 ± 46 mL/mg versus 33 ± 25 mL/mg; p=0.007). Based on our analysis, similar urine output may be achieved with either intravenous bumetanide or furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure; however a higher dose of furosemide may be required than what has been previously established as an equivalent dose to bumetanide to achieve a similar diuretic effect. These results should warrant further investigation to better establish dose-response relationships with loop diuretics in the acute decompensate heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Urine Output Response of Intravenous Bumetanide and Furosemide in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: an observational analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Kefer, Brian Gulbis, Phillip Weeks\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FJC.0000000000001658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Loop diuretics are a fundamental cornerstone in management of hypervolemia encountered in acute decompensated heart failure. There is variation in literature describing relative potency of loop diuretic agents, and very limited available data specific to the heart failure population. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare the urine output response between intravenous furosemide and bumetanide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were admitted between July 1, 2021 and June 30, 2022, with acute decompensated heart failure and received intravenous bumetanide or furosemide within 48 hours of admission. Propensity matching was utilized to determine comparison groups. The primary outcome was total urine output for 24 hours following initiation of the diuretic regimen. A total of 120 patients (60 in each group) were matched after exclusion criteria were applied. The total urine output was similar between groups. The bumetanide group did demonstrate a greater urine output: furosemide equivalent response (52 ± 46 mL/mg versus 33 ± 25 mL/mg; p=0.007). Based on our analysis, similar urine output may be achieved with either intravenous bumetanide or furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure; however a higher dose of furosemide may be required than what has been previously established as an equivalent dose to bumetanide to achieve a similar diuretic effect. These results should warrant further investigation to better establish dose-response relationships with loop diuretics in the acute decompensate heart failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000001658\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000001658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
循环利尿剂是管理急性失代偿性心力衰竭时遇到的高血容量的基本基石。文献中描述环型利尿剂的相对效力存在差异,并且针对心力衰竭人群的可用数据非常有限。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们旨在比较急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者静脉注射呋塞米和布美他尼的尿输出反应。如果患者在2021年7月1日至2022年6月30日期间入院,患有急性失代偿性心力衰竭,并在入院后48小时内静脉注射布美他尼或速尿,则有资格纳入研究。倾向匹配用于确定对照组。主要终点是开始利尿方案后24小时的总尿量。采用排除标准后,共匹配120例患者(每组60例)。两组总尿量相似。布美他尼组确实表现出更大的尿量:呋塞米等效反应(52±46 mL/mg vs 33±25 mL/mg;p = 0.007)。根据我们的分析,急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者静脉注射布美他尼或速尿均可达到相似的尿量;然而,要达到类似的利尿作用,可能需要比先前确定的布美他尼等效剂量更高的呋塞米剂量。这些结果值得进一步研究,以更好地建立利尿剂在急性失代偿性心力衰竭中的剂量-反应关系。
Comparison of Urine Output Response of Intravenous Bumetanide and Furosemide in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: an observational analysis.
Loop diuretics are a fundamental cornerstone in management of hypervolemia encountered in acute decompensated heart failure. There is variation in literature describing relative potency of loop diuretic agents, and very limited available data specific to the heart failure population. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to compare the urine output response between intravenous furosemide and bumetanide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were admitted between July 1, 2021 and June 30, 2022, with acute decompensated heart failure and received intravenous bumetanide or furosemide within 48 hours of admission. Propensity matching was utilized to determine comparison groups. The primary outcome was total urine output for 24 hours following initiation of the diuretic regimen. A total of 120 patients (60 in each group) were matched after exclusion criteria were applied. The total urine output was similar between groups. The bumetanide group did demonstrate a greater urine output: furosemide equivalent response (52 ± 46 mL/mg versus 33 ± 25 mL/mg; p=0.007). Based on our analysis, similar urine output may be achieved with either intravenous bumetanide or furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure; however a higher dose of furosemide may be required than what has been previously established as an equivalent dose to bumetanide to achieve a similar diuretic effect. These results should warrant further investigation to better establish dose-response relationships with loop diuretics in the acute decompensate heart failure.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal that publishes original articles and pertinent review articles on basic and clinical aspects of cardiovascular pharmacology. The Journal encourages submission in all aspects of cardiovascular pharmacology/medicine including, but not limited to: stroke, kidney disease, lipid disorders, diabetes, systemic and pulmonary hypertension, cancer angiogenesis, neural and hormonal control of the circulation, sepsis, neurodegenerative diseases with a vascular component, cardiac and vascular remodeling, heart failure, angina, anticoagulants/antiplatelet agents, drugs/agents that affect vascular smooth muscle, and arrhythmias.
Appropriate subjects include new drug development and evaluation, physiological and pharmacological bases of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions and side effects, application of drugs to gain novel insights into physiology or pathological conditions, clinical results with new and established agents, and novel methods. The focus is on pharmacology in its broadest applications, incorporating not only traditional approaches, but new approaches to the development of pharmacological agents and the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Please note that JCVP does not publish work based on biological extracts of mixed and uncertain chemical composition or unknown concentration.