中文版疼痛缓解动机量表在神经源性慢性疼痛患者中的心理测量特征。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.004
Yunmei Ding, Yanyan Zhang, Shouwei Yue
{"title":"中文版疼痛缓解动机量表在神经源性慢性疼痛患者中的心理测量特征。","authors":"Yunmei Ding, Yanyan Zhang, Shouwei Yue","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pain Relief Motivation Scale (PRMS) was administered to chronic pain sufferers and predicts their psychological well-being. However, the Chinese version of the PRMS has not undergone psychometric validation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The PRMS will be psychometrically validated in patients with neuropathic pain-induced chronic pain from mainland China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 340 patients with neuropathic chronic pain from China. The measurability of the Chinese version of the PRMS was determined by the critical ratio between items, and reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The study also examined the validity of the construction and criterion validity of the Chinese PRMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chinese version of the PRMS had critical ratio (CR) values ranging from 4.044 to 15.977 (p < 0.05). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.821, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.663 to 0.961. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) showed that five variables accounted for 77.73% of the total variance. The results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported the framework for the assessment of the 21-item PRMS. The Chinese version of the PRMS was positively correlated with the General Self-Efficacy Scale in the correlation validity analyses (r = 0.458, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Chinese version of the PRMS has powerful validity and reliability and can be used to assess the level of the motivation for pain alleviation in people with pain, serving as a reference for the development of intervention programs for healthcare providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Pain Relief Motivation Scale in Patients With Neurogenic Chronic Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Yunmei Ding, Yanyan Zhang, Shouwei Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pain Relief Motivation Scale (PRMS) was administered to chronic pain sufferers and predicts their psychological well-being. However, the Chinese version of the PRMS has not undergone psychometric validation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The PRMS will be psychometrically validated in patients with neuropathic pain-induced chronic pain from mainland China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 340 patients with neuropathic chronic pain from China. The measurability of the Chinese version of the PRMS was determined by the critical ratio between items, and reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The study also examined the validity of the construction and criterion validity of the Chinese PRMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chinese version of the PRMS had critical ratio (CR) values ranging from 4.044 to 15.977 (p < 0.05). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.821, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.663 to 0.961. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) showed that five variables accounted for 77.73% of the total variance. The results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported the framework for the assessment of the 21-item PRMS. The Chinese version of the PRMS was positively correlated with the General Self-Efficacy Scale in the correlation validity analyses (r = 0.458, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Chinese version of the PRMS has powerful validity and reliability and can be used to assess the level of the motivation for pain alleviation in people with pain, serving as a reference for the development of intervention programs for healthcare providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采用疼痛缓解动机量表(PRMS)对慢性疼痛患者进行心理健康评估。然而,中文版的PRMS并没有经过心理测量学的验证。目的:对来自中国大陆的神经性疼痛引起的慢性疼痛患者进行心理测量学验证。方法:本横断面研究纳入340例中国神经性慢性疼痛患者。中文版PRMS的可测性采用项间临界比确定,信度采用Cronbach’s alpha系数确定。本研究还检验了中国PRMS量表的结构效度和标准效度。结果:中文版PRMS的临界比值(CR)在4.044 ~ 15.977之间(p < 0.05)。量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.821,子量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.663 ~ 0.961。探索性因子分析(EFA)显示,5个变量占总方差的77.73%。验证性因子分析(CFA)的结果支持了21项PRMS的评估框架。在相关效度分析中,中文版自我效能量表与一般自我效能量表呈显著正相关(r = 0.458, p < 0.001)。结论:中文版的PRMS具有较强的效度和信度,可用于评估疼痛患者的疼痛缓解动机水平,为医疗服务提供者制定干预方案提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Pain Relief Motivation Scale in Patients With Neurogenic Chronic Pain.

Background: The Pain Relief Motivation Scale (PRMS) was administered to chronic pain sufferers and predicts their psychological well-being. However, the Chinese version of the PRMS has not undergone psychometric validation.

Objectives: The PRMS will be psychometrically validated in patients with neuropathic pain-induced chronic pain from mainland China.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 340 patients with neuropathic chronic pain from China. The measurability of the Chinese version of the PRMS was determined by the critical ratio between items, and reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The study also examined the validity of the construction and criterion validity of the Chinese PRMS.

Results: The Chinese version of the PRMS had critical ratio (CR) values ranging from 4.044 to 15.977 (p < 0.05). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.821, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.663 to 0.961. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) showed that five variables accounted for 77.73% of the total variance. The results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported the framework for the assessment of the 21-item PRMS. The Chinese version of the PRMS was positively correlated with the General Self-Efficacy Scale in the correlation validity analyses (r = 0.458, p < .001).

Conclusion: The Chinese version of the PRMS has powerful validity and reliability and can be used to assess the level of the motivation for pain alleviation in people with pain, serving as a reference for the development of intervention programs for healthcare providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Buzzy and ShotBlocker on Pain and Anxiety During Immunization in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Physical Exercise on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Comparison of the Predictive Role of Spiritual Well-Being and Pain Intensity on Pain Catastrophizing in Acute and Chronic Pain. Exploring Pain and Opioid Misuse Among Patients With Sickle Cell Anemia: Associations With Health Literacy and Pain Catastrophizing. Nurse-Led Service Model for Outpatient Pain-Free Management Under Anesthesiologist Supervision: A Single Center, Observational Study in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1