低渗透压口服补液治疗儿童腹泻:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.7189/jogh.14.04166
Mustafa Bin Ali Zubairi, Syeda Kanza Naqvi, Ayesha Arshad Ali, Ashraf Sharif, Rehana Abdus Salam, Zain Hasnain, Sajid Soofi, Shabina Ariff, Yasir Bin Nisar, Jai K Das
{"title":"低渗透压口服补液治疗儿童腹泻:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mustafa Bin Ali Zubairi, Syeda Kanza Naqvi, Ayesha Arshad Ali, Ashraf Sharif, Rehana Abdus Salam, Zain Hasnain, Sajid Soofi, Shabina Ariff, Yasir Bin Nisar, Jai K Das","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral rehydration solution (ORS) is crucial in the management of diarrhoea. Until the early 2000s, the standard formulation of glucose-based ORS with a total osmolarity of 311 mmol/L was being used for this purpose. However, due to concerns about sodium levels and cases of hypernatremia, a low-osmolarity ORS solution (LORS) with an osmolarity of 245mmol/L or less was developed to replace the standard ORS. With this systematic review, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of LORS compared to standard ORS for the treatment of acute and persistent diarrhoea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We comprehensively searched PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Scopus until 20 July 2023 for studies published after 1990 assessing the efficacy of LORS in acute and persistent diarrhoea in children under 10 years of age. Meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan software. We performed log approximation for all the values for an outcome when studies reported arithmetic and geometric means per the Cochrane Handbook. We otherwise used the Cochrane Risk of Bias II tool to assess the risk of bias in individual studies, and assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. This review was commissioned by the WHO for revision of guidelines for childhood diarrhoea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the comparison of LORS to standard ORS in acute diarrhoea, our findings suggest that there was a significant decrease in the duration of diarrhoea (mean difference (MD) = -0.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.41, -0.15; moderate certainty of evidence), stool output (MD = -0.25; 95% CI = -0.35, -0.16; very low certainty of evidence), and ORS intake (MD = -0.18; 95% CI = -0.28, -0.07; moderate certainty of evidence) in patients receiving LORS. There was a comparable effect on the number of patients cured within five days, treatment failure, and frequency of unscheduled intravenous therapy (risk ratio (RR) = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.72, 9.38; low certainty of evidence). For persistent diarrhoea, there was a significant decrease in duration of diarrhoea (MD = -30.60; 95% CI = -48.95, -12.25), stool output (MD = -14.00; 95% CI = -26.63, -1.37), and ORS intake (MD = -21.40; 95% CI = -41.01, -1.79), while there was a comparable effect on the number of patients cured.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that LORS should continue to be recommended in children under the age of 10 years with acute watery or persistent diarrhoea and upholds the current WHO recommendations.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42023438762.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04166"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-osmolarity oral rehydration solution for childhood diarrhoea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Bin Ali Zubairi, Syeda Kanza Naqvi, Ayesha Arshad Ali, Ashraf Sharif, Rehana Abdus Salam, Zain Hasnain, Sajid Soofi, Shabina Ariff, Yasir Bin Nisar, Jai K Das\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.14.04166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral rehydration solution (ORS) is crucial in the management of diarrhoea. Until the early 2000s, the standard formulation of glucose-based ORS with a total osmolarity of 311 mmol/L was being used for this purpose. However, due to concerns about sodium levels and cases of hypernatremia, a low-osmolarity ORS solution (LORS) with an osmolarity of 245mmol/L or less was developed to replace the standard ORS. With this systematic review, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of LORS compared to standard ORS for the treatment of acute and persistent diarrhoea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We comprehensively searched PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Scopus until 20 July 2023 for studies published after 1990 assessing the efficacy of LORS in acute and persistent diarrhoea in children under 10 years of age. Meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan software. We performed log approximation for all the values for an outcome when studies reported arithmetic and geometric means per the Cochrane Handbook. We otherwise used the Cochrane Risk of Bias II tool to assess the risk of bias in individual studies, and assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. This review was commissioned by the WHO for revision of guidelines for childhood diarrhoea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the comparison of LORS to standard ORS in acute diarrhoea, our findings suggest that there was a significant decrease in the duration of diarrhoea (mean difference (MD) = -0.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.41, -0.15; moderate certainty of evidence), stool output (MD = -0.25; 95% CI = -0.35, -0.16; very low certainty of evidence), and ORS intake (MD = -0.18; 95% CI = -0.28, -0.07; moderate certainty of evidence) in patients receiving LORS. There was a comparable effect on the number of patients cured within five days, treatment failure, and frequency of unscheduled intravenous therapy (risk ratio (RR) = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.72, 9.38; low certainty of evidence). For persistent diarrhoea, there was a significant decrease in duration of diarrhoea (MD = -30.60; 95% CI = -48.95, -12.25), stool output (MD = -14.00; 95% CI = -26.63, -1.37), and ORS intake (MD = -21.40; 95% CI = -41.01, -1.79), while there was a comparable effect on the number of patients cured.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that LORS should continue to be recommended in children under the age of 10 years with acute watery or persistent diarrhoea and upholds the current WHO recommendations.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42023438762.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"04166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622343/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04166\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口服补液(ORS)是治疗腹泻的关键。直到21世纪初,总渗透压为311 mmol/L的葡萄糖基ORS标准配方一直用于此目的。然而,由于对钠水平和高钠血症病例的担忧,开发了渗透压为245mmol/L或更低的低渗透压ORS溶液(LORS)来取代标准ORS。通过本系统综述,我们旨在评估LORS与标准ORS在治疗急性和持续性腹泻方面的有效性。方法:我们综合检索PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台和Scopus,直到2023年7月20日,检索1990年以后发表的评估LORS对10岁以下儿童急性和持续性腹泻疗效的研究。采用RevMan软件进行meta分析。当研究根据Cochrane手册报告算术和几何平均数时,我们对结果的所有值进行对数近似。另外,我们使用Cochraneⅱ类偏倚风险工具来评估个别研究的偏倚风险,并使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级方法评估证据质量。这项审查是世卫组织为修订儿童腹泻指南而委托进行的。结果:对于急性腹泻的LORS与标准ORS的比较,我们的研究结果表明,腹泻持续时间显著缩短(平均差值(MD) = -0.28;95%置信区间(CI) = -0.41, -0.15;中度证据确定性),粪便排出量(MD = -0.25;95% ci = -0.35, -0.16;证据确定性极低)和口服补液摄入量(MD = -0.18;95% ci = -0.28, -0.07;中等证据确定性)。5天内治愈的患者数量、治疗失败和计划外静脉治疗的频率也有类似的影响(风险比(RR) = 0.77;95% ci = 0.72, 9.38;证据的低确定性)。对于持续性腹泻,腹泻持续时间显著减少(MD = -30.60;95% CI = -48.95, -12.25),凳子输出(MD = -14.00;95% CI = -26.63, -1.37),口服补液盐摄入量(MD = -21.40;95% CI = -41.01, -1.79),而在治愈患者数量上也有类似的效果。结论:我们的研究结果表明,对于患有急性水样腹泻或持续性腹泻的10岁以下儿童,应继续推荐LORS,并支持目前世卫组织的建议。注册:普洛斯彼罗:CRD42023438762。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low-osmolarity oral rehydration solution for childhood diarrhoea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Oral rehydration solution (ORS) is crucial in the management of diarrhoea. Until the early 2000s, the standard formulation of glucose-based ORS with a total osmolarity of 311 mmol/L was being used for this purpose. However, due to concerns about sodium levels and cases of hypernatremia, a low-osmolarity ORS solution (LORS) with an osmolarity of 245mmol/L or less was developed to replace the standard ORS. With this systematic review, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of LORS compared to standard ORS for the treatment of acute and persistent diarrhoea.

Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Scopus until 20 July 2023 for studies published after 1990 assessing the efficacy of LORS in acute and persistent diarrhoea in children under 10 years of age. Meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan software. We performed log approximation for all the values for an outcome when studies reported arithmetic and geometric means per the Cochrane Handbook. We otherwise used the Cochrane Risk of Bias II tool to assess the risk of bias in individual studies, and assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. This review was commissioned by the WHO for revision of guidelines for childhood diarrhoea.

Results: For the comparison of LORS to standard ORS in acute diarrhoea, our findings suggest that there was a significant decrease in the duration of diarrhoea (mean difference (MD) = -0.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.41, -0.15; moderate certainty of evidence), stool output (MD = -0.25; 95% CI = -0.35, -0.16; very low certainty of evidence), and ORS intake (MD = -0.18; 95% CI = -0.28, -0.07; moderate certainty of evidence) in patients receiving LORS. There was a comparable effect on the number of patients cured within five days, treatment failure, and frequency of unscheduled intravenous therapy (risk ratio (RR) = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.72, 9.38; low certainty of evidence). For persistent diarrhoea, there was a significant decrease in duration of diarrhoea (MD = -30.60; 95% CI = -48.95, -12.25), stool output (MD = -14.00; 95% CI = -26.63, -1.37), and ORS intake (MD = -21.40; 95% CI = -41.01, -1.79), while there was a comparable effect on the number of patients cured.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that LORS should continue to be recommended in children under the age of 10 years with acute watery or persistent diarrhoea and upholds the current WHO recommendations.

Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42023438762.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Paediatric healthcare in Manhiça district through a gender lens: a retrospective analysis of 17 years of morbidity and demographic surveillance data. Spatial patterns and temporal trends in stillbirth, neonatal, and infant mortality: an exploration of country-level data from 2000 to 2021. The treatment responses among different inhalation therapies for GOLD group E patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The efficiency and productivity-changing trend of PHCIs since the 2009 health reform in China based on a three-stage DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index. Using calculations from the Lives Saved Tool in other global health modelling tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1