N G Vinogradova, D S Polyakov, I V Fomin, A R Vaisberg, V A Pogrebetskaya
{"title":"某专科中心心衰患者5年门诊随访结果分析。","authors":"N G Vinogradova, D S Polyakov, I V Fomin, A R Vaisberg, V A Pogrebetskaya","doi":"10.18087/cardio.2024.11.n2783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim To evaluate the risks of all-cause death (ACD), cardiovascular death (CVD), death from recurrent acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and a composite index of CVD and death from recurrent ADHF in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) after the first hospitalization for ADHF during a long-term, five-year follow-up in the conditions of specialized medical care and in real clinical practice.Material and methods This prospective cohort observational study included 942 patients after ADHF. Group 1 consisted of 510 patients who continued the outpatient follow-up at a specialized center for the treatment of CHF (cCHF); group 2 consisted of 432 patients followed up at outpatient and polyclinic institutions (OPI) at the place of residence. During the five-year follow-up, the causes of death were determined based on the medical records of inpatients, postmortem examinations, or the conclusion in the medical records of outpatients. Rates of ACD, CVD, death from recurrent ADHF, and the composite index (CVD and death from ADHF) were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with a R statistical package.Results ACD was 32.3% and 53.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). Based on the results of Cox proportional hazards models, it was shown that the follow-up in group 1, regardless of other factors, was associated with a decrease in the ACD risk (HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.68-2.54; p<0.001), CVD (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.26-2.97; p=0.002), death from recurrent ADHF (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.66-3.42; p<0.001) and the composite mortality index (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.65-2.85; p<0.001) compared to group 2. The risks of death in CHF patients with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFmrEF) were consistent with the death rates in CHF patients with low LVEF (HFrEF) and were significantly higher than in CHF patients with preserved LVEF (HFpEF). The prognosis of life worsened with an increase in the Clinical Condition Assessment Scale score and age. The prognosis of life was better in women, as well as with higher values of systolic blood pressure (BP) and 6-minute walk test. In the structure of death in both groups, death from ADHF and sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevailed.Conclusion The absence of specialized follow-up at an outpatient CHF center increases the risks of ACD, CVD, death from recurrent ADHF, and the composite endpoint at a depth of five-year observation. The leading causes of death were recurrent ADHF and SCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54750,"journal":{"name":"Kardiologiya","volume":"64 11","pages":"84-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of Five-Year Outpatient Follow-Up of Patients With Heart Failure in a Specialized Center.\",\"authors\":\"N G Vinogradova, D S Polyakov, I V Fomin, A R Vaisberg, V A Pogrebetskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.18087/cardio.2024.11.n2783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aim To evaluate the risks of all-cause death (ACD), cardiovascular death (CVD), death from recurrent acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and a composite index of CVD and death from recurrent ADHF in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) after the first hospitalization for ADHF during a long-term, five-year follow-up in the conditions of specialized medical care and in real clinical practice.Material and methods This prospective cohort observational study included 942 patients after ADHF. Group 1 consisted of 510 patients who continued the outpatient follow-up at a specialized center for the treatment of CHF (cCHF); group 2 consisted of 432 patients followed up at outpatient and polyclinic institutions (OPI) at the place of residence. During the five-year follow-up, the causes of death were determined based on the medical records of inpatients, postmortem examinations, or the conclusion in the medical records of outpatients. Rates of ACD, CVD, death from recurrent ADHF, and the composite index (CVD and death from ADHF) were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with a R statistical package.Results ACD was 32.3% and 53.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). Based on the results of Cox proportional hazards models, it was shown that the follow-up in group 1, regardless of other factors, was associated with a decrease in the ACD risk (HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.68-2.54; p<0.001), CVD (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.26-2.97; p=0.002), death from recurrent ADHF (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.66-3.42; p<0.001) and the composite mortality index (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.65-2.85; p<0.001) compared to group 2. The risks of death in CHF patients with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFmrEF) were consistent with the death rates in CHF patients with low LVEF (HFrEF) and were significantly higher than in CHF patients with preserved LVEF (HFpEF). The prognosis of life worsened with an increase in the Clinical Condition Assessment Scale score and age. The prognosis of life was better in women, as well as with higher values of systolic blood pressure (BP) and 6-minute walk test. In the structure of death in both groups, death from ADHF and sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevailed.Conclusion The absence of specialized follow-up at an outpatient CHF center increases the risks of ACD, CVD, death from recurrent ADHF, and the composite endpoint at a depth of five-year observation. The leading causes of death were recurrent ADHF and SCD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kardiologiya\",\"volume\":\"64 11\",\"pages\":\"84-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kardiologiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2024.11.n2783\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiologiya","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2024.11.n2783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评价慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者首次住院ADHF后的全因死亡(ACD)、心血管死亡(CVD)、复发性急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)死亡的风险,以及CVD和复发性ADHF死亡的综合指数。材料与方法本前瞻性队列观察研究纳入942例ADHF患者。第1组包括510名患者,他们继续在专门的治疗中心进行门诊随访(cCHF);第二组为432例患者,在门诊和综合门诊机构(OPI)进行随访。在5年的随访期间,根据住院患者的医疗记录、尸检检查或门诊患者医疗记录中的结论确定死亡原因。分析ACD、CVD、复发性ADHF死亡率及综合指数(CVD和ADHF死亡)。采用R统计软件包进行统计分析。结果1组和2组ACD分别为32.3%和53.5% (p<0.001)。根据Cox比例风险模型的结果显示,无论其他因素如何,第1组的随访与ACD风险降低相关(HR 2.07;95% ci 1.68-2.54;p<0.001), CVD (HR 1.94;95% ci 1.26-2.97;p=0.002),复发性ADHF死亡(HR 2.4;95% ci 1.66-3.42;p<0.001)和综合死亡率指数(HR 2.2;95% ci 1.65-2.85;p < 0.001)。中度降低左心室射血分数(LVEF) (HFmrEF)的CHF患者的死亡风险与低LVEF (HFrEF)的CHF患者的死亡率一致,且显著高于保留LVEF (HFpEF)的CHF患者。预后随临床状况评定量表评分和年龄的增加而恶化。女性患者的生存预后较好,收缩压(BP)和6分钟步行试验值较高。两组的死亡结构均以ADHF和心源性猝死(SCD)为主。结论在门诊CHF中心缺乏专门的随访增加了ACD、CVD、复发性ADHF死亡的风险和五年观察深度的综合终点。死亡的主要原因是复发性ADHF和SCD。
Results of Five-Year Outpatient Follow-Up of Patients With Heart Failure in a Specialized Center.
Aim To evaluate the risks of all-cause death (ACD), cardiovascular death (CVD), death from recurrent acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and a composite index of CVD and death from recurrent ADHF in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) after the first hospitalization for ADHF during a long-term, five-year follow-up in the conditions of specialized medical care and in real clinical practice.Material and methods This prospective cohort observational study included 942 patients after ADHF. Group 1 consisted of 510 patients who continued the outpatient follow-up at a specialized center for the treatment of CHF (cCHF); group 2 consisted of 432 patients followed up at outpatient and polyclinic institutions (OPI) at the place of residence. During the five-year follow-up, the causes of death were determined based on the medical records of inpatients, postmortem examinations, or the conclusion in the medical records of outpatients. Rates of ACD, CVD, death from recurrent ADHF, and the composite index (CVD and death from ADHF) were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with a R statistical package.Results ACD was 32.3% and 53.5% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). Based on the results of Cox proportional hazards models, it was shown that the follow-up in group 1, regardless of other factors, was associated with a decrease in the ACD risk (HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.68-2.54; p<0.001), CVD (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.26-2.97; p=0.002), death from recurrent ADHF (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.66-3.42; p<0.001) and the composite mortality index (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.65-2.85; p<0.001) compared to group 2. The risks of death in CHF patients with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFmrEF) were consistent with the death rates in CHF patients with low LVEF (HFrEF) and were significantly higher than in CHF patients with preserved LVEF (HFpEF). The prognosis of life worsened with an increase in the Clinical Condition Assessment Scale score and age. The prognosis of life was better in women, as well as with higher values of systolic blood pressure (BP) and 6-minute walk test. In the structure of death in both groups, death from ADHF and sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevailed.Conclusion The absence of specialized follow-up at an outpatient CHF center increases the risks of ACD, CVD, death from recurrent ADHF, and the composite endpoint at a depth of five-year observation. The leading causes of death were recurrent ADHF and SCD.
期刊介绍:
“Kardiologiya” (Cardiology) is a monthly scientific, peer-reviewed journal committed to both basic cardiovascular medicine and practical aspects of cardiology.
As the leader in its field, “Kardiologiya” provides original coverage of recent progress in cardiovascular medicine. We publish state-of-the-art articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. Our target audience spans a diversity of health care professionals and medical researchers working in cardiovascular medicine and related fields.
The principal language of the Journal is Russian, an additional language – English (title, authors’ information, abstract, keywords).
“Kardiologiya” is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. All articles are reviewed by scientists, who gained high international prestige in cardiovascular science and clinical cardiology. The Journal is currently cited and indexed in major Abstracting & Indexing databases: Web of Science, Medline and Scopus.
The Journal''s primary objectives
Contribute to raising the professional level of medical researchers, physicians and academic teachers.
Present the results of current research and clinical observations, explore the effectiveness of drug and non-drug treatments of heart disease, inform about new diagnostic techniques; discuss current trends and new advancements in clinical cardiology, contribute to continuing medical education, inform readers about results of Russian and international scientific forums;
Further improve the general quality of reviewing and editing of manuscripts submitted for publication;
Provide the widest possible dissemination of the published articles, among the global scientific community;
Extend distribution and indexing of scientific publications in major Abstracting & Indexing databases.