循证实践框架中的患者参与。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241302941
Jarrod Dusin, Jill Peltzer
{"title":"循证实践框架中的患者参与。","authors":"Jarrod Dusin, Jill Peltzer","doi":"10.1177/23743735241302941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the cornerstone of contemporary healthcare, promoting the integration of scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values to inform clinical decision-making and enhance patient outcomes. While patient engagement is recognized as a critical component of EBP, the extent to which it is incorporated in various EBP frameworks is unclear. This study is a secondary analysis of a scoping review which evaluated EBP frameworks used in healthcare settings. In the current study, our objective was to assess the level of patient engagement within those frameworks. To achieve this, we employed a patient engagement framework which characterizes engagement as a continuum, spanning consultation to involvement to shared leadership/partnership, across 3 healthcare domains: direct care, organizational design and governance, and policymaking. Our analysis revealed a gap in integrating patient values and preferences within EBP frameworks. Only 3 of the assessed frameworks showed a high degree of engagement across all domains. Future research should focus on developing strategies for implementing and evaluating meaningful engagement in EBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241302941"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Engagement in Evidence-Based Practice Frameworks.\",\"authors\":\"Jarrod Dusin, Jill Peltzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23743735241302941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the cornerstone of contemporary healthcare, promoting the integration of scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values to inform clinical decision-making and enhance patient outcomes. While patient engagement is recognized as a critical component of EBP, the extent to which it is incorporated in various EBP frameworks is unclear. This study is a secondary analysis of a scoping review which evaluated EBP frameworks used in healthcare settings. In the current study, our objective was to assess the level of patient engagement within those frameworks. To achieve this, we employed a patient engagement framework which characterizes engagement as a continuum, spanning consultation to involvement to shared leadership/partnership, across 3 healthcare domains: direct care, organizational design and governance, and policymaking. Our analysis revealed a gap in integrating patient values and preferences within EBP frameworks. Only 3 of the assessed frameworks showed a high degree of engagement across all domains. Future research should focus on developing strategies for implementing and evaluating meaningful engagement in EBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23743735241302941\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11618891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241302941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241302941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循证实践(EBP)是当代医疗保健的基石,促进科学证据、临床专业知识和患者价值的整合,为临床决策提供信息,并提高患者的治疗效果。虽然患者参与被认为是EBP的关键组成部分,但它在各种EBP框架中的纳入程度尚不清楚。本研究是对一项评估医疗环境中使用的EBP框架的范围审查的二次分析。在当前的研究中,我们的目标是评估患者在这些框架内的参与程度。为了实现这一目标,我们采用了一个患者参与框架,该框架将参与描述为一个连续体,从咨询到参与到共享领导/伙伴关系,跨越3个医疗保健领域:直接护理、组织设计和治理以及政策制定。我们的分析揭示了在EBP框架内整合患者价值和偏好方面的差距。在被评估的框架中,只有3个在所有领域显示出高度的参与。未来的研究应侧重于制定实施和评估EBP中有意义的参与的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Engagement in Evidence-Based Practice Frameworks.

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the cornerstone of contemporary healthcare, promoting the integration of scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values to inform clinical decision-making and enhance patient outcomes. While patient engagement is recognized as a critical component of EBP, the extent to which it is incorporated in various EBP frameworks is unclear. This study is a secondary analysis of a scoping review which evaluated EBP frameworks used in healthcare settings. In the current study, our objective was to assess the level of patient engagement within those frameworks. To achieve this, we employed a patient engagement framework which characterizes engagement as a continuum, spanning consultation to involvement to shared leadership/partnership, across 3 healthcare domains: direct care, organizational design and governance, and policymaking. Our analysis revealed a gap in integrating patient values and preferences within EBP frameworks. Only 3 of the assessed frameworks showed a high degree of engagement across all domains. Future research should focus on developing strategies for implementing and evaluating meaningful engagement in EBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gendered Experiences of Intravenous Iron Infusion Reactions: A Patient Perspective. Addressing the Underrepresentation of African American Mental Health Professionals: A Call to Action. Enhancing Patient Choice Through the Development of Physical Therapist Online Biographies. Engaging Patients with Headache in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): ACTIvated Veterans Engagement Group (ACTIVE) to Improve Delivery of Patient-Centered Headache Services. Impact of Standardized Reporting Systems on Patient Experience in Radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1