评估孟加拉国指定公共卫生设施中选定生殖健康指标的数据质量。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.7189/jogh.14.04259
Fauzia Akhter Huda, Meftah Uddin Mahmud, Tanjeena Tahrin Islam, Salma Akter, Sadia Fatema Kabir, Md Shahadat Hossain, Shah Ali Akbar Ashrafi, M Naser Uddin, Farhana Habib, Sharon Kim Gibbons, Onikepe O Owolabi
{"title":"评估孟加拉国指定公共卫生设施中选定生殖健康指标的数据质量。","authors":"Fauzia Akhter Huda, Meftah Uddin Mahmud, Tanjeena Tahrin Islam, Salma Akter, Sadia Fatema Kabir, Md Shahadat Hossain, Shah Ali Akbar Ashrafi, M Naser Uddin, Farhana Habib, Sharon Kim Gibbons, Onikepe O Owolabi","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.04259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An effective health management information system plays a pivotal role in evidence-based decision-making and strengthening health service delivery in a country. The Directorate General of Health Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning of Bangladesh have adopted digital health management information system platforms named district health information system and management information system, respectively. Despite its significance, health management information system data has numerous issues, such as missing values, inaccuracies, lack of internal consistency, and the presence of outliers. This study aims to assess the data quality of reproductive health indicators in the health management information system of the Directorate General of Health Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study examined two aspects of data quality: a) completeness of data, subdivided into completeness of facility reporting (report submission rate) and completeness of indicator data (presence of missing values); b) internal consistency of reported data, subdivided into presence of outliers, inter-indicator consistency, and consistency between reported data and original records (accuracy rate). The study utilised retrospective monthly data gathered from July 2021 to June 2022, covering 21 reproductive health indicators. Multi-stage cluster sampling was employed to select 112 health facilities for data collection, including 48 facilities from Directorate General of Health Services and 64 from Directorate General of Family Planning, representing various administrative levels across the country.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The report submission rate for Directorate General of Health Services facilities was 98%, while for the Directorate General of Family Planning facilities, it was 86%. However, 35% of data points were missing in the district health information system server of Directorate General of Health Services, whereas no missing values were observed in the management information system server of Directorate General of Family Planning. Less than 3% of outliers were detected in the server data of both directorates. Inter-indicator consistency was maintained at a high rate of 98% in health facilities under both directorates. The accuracy of reported data varied across indicators and facility types: Directorate General of Health Services facilities showed accuracy rates ranging between 75 and 92%, with an aggregated rate of 86%. Different tiers of the Directorate General of Family Planning facilities had accuracy rates ranging from 92 to 96%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research emphasises the significance of rectifying missing values, ensuring consistency, and improving reporting systems, with a particular focus on lower-tier health facilities, to enhance the validity and reliability of reproductive health data in Bangladesh.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"04259"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the quality of data for selected reproductive health indicators in designated public health facilities in Bangladesh.\",\"authors\":\"Fauzia Akhter Huda, Meftah Uddin Mahmud, Tanjeena Tahrin Islam, Salma Akter, Sadia Fatema Kabir, Md Shahadat Hossain, Shah Ali Akbar Ashrafi, M Naser Uddin, Farhana Habib, Sharon Kim Gibbons, Onikepe O Owolabi\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.14.04259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An effective health management information system plays a pivotal role in evidence-based decision-making and strengthening health service delivery in a country. The Directorate General of Health Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning of Bangladesh have adopted digital health management information system platforms named district health information system and management information system, respectively. Despite its significance, health management information system data has numerous issues, such as missing values, inaccuracies, lack of internal consistency, and the presence of outliers. This study aims to assess the data quality of reproductive health indicators in the health management information system of the Directorate General of Health Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study examined two aspects of data quality: a) completeness of data, subdivided into completeness of facility reporting (report submission rate) and completeness of indicator data (presence of missing values); b) internal consistency of reported data, subdivided into presence of outliers, inter-indicator consistency, and consistency between reported data and original records (accuracy rate). The study utilised retrospective monthly data gathered from July 2021 to June 2022, covering 21 reproductive health indicators. Multi-stage cluster sampling was employed to select 112 health facilities for data collection, including 48 facilities from Directorate General of Health Services and 64 from Directorate General of Family Planning, representing various administrative levels across the country.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The report submission rate for Directorate General of Health Services facilities was 98%, while for the Directorate General of Family Planning facilities, it was 86%. However, 35% of data points were missing in the district health information system server of Directorate General of Health Services, whereas no missing values were observed in the management information system server of Directorate General of Family Planning. Less than 3% of outliers were detected in the server data of both directorates. Inter-indicator consistency was maintained at a high rate of 98% in health facilities under both directorates. The accuracy of reported data varied across indicators and facility types: Directorate General of Health Services facilities showed accuracy rates ranging between 75 and 92%, with an aggregated rate of 86%. Different tiers of the Directorate General of Family Planning facilities had accuracy rates ranging from 92 to 96%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research emphasises the significance of rectifying missing values, ensuring consistency, and improving reporting systems, with a particular focus on lower-tier health facilities, to enhance the validity and reliability of reproductive health data in Bangladesh.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"04259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04259\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一个有效的卫生管理信息系统在一个国家的循证决策和加强卫生服务提供方面发挥着关键作用。孟加拉国卫生服务总局和计划生育总局分别采用了名为区卫生信息系统和管理信息系统的数字卫生管理信息系统平台。尽管具有重要意义,但健康管理信息系统数据存在许多问题,例如缺失值、不准确、缺乏内部一致性以及异常值的存在。这项研究的目的是评估保健服务总局和计划生育总局的保健管理信息系统中生殖健康指标的数据质量。方法:研究从两个方面考察数据质量:a)数据的完整性,细分为设施报告的完整性(报告提交率)和指标数据的完整性(缺失值的存在);B)报告数据的内部一致性,细分为异常值的存在、指标间一致性、报告数据与原始记录的一致性(准确率)。该研究利用了从2021年7月至2022年6月收集的月度回顾性数据,涵盖21项生殖健康指标。采用多阶段整群抽样方法,选择112个卫生设施进行数据收集,其中48个来自卫生服务总局,64个来自计划生育总局,代表了全国不同的行政级别。结果:卫生服务总局机构的报告提交率为98%,计划生育总局机构的报告提交率为86%。然而,卫生服务总局地区卫生信息系统服务器缺失35%的数据点,而计划生育总局管理信息系统服务器未发现缺失值。在两个董事的服务器数据中检测到的异常值不到3%。在两个部门的卫生设施中,指标间的一致性保持在98%的高水平。报告数据的准确性因指标和设施类型而异:卫生服务总局的设施显示准确率在75%至92%之间,总准确率为86%。计划生育总局各级设施的准确率从92%到96%不等。结论:本研究强调了纠正缺失价值、确保一致性和改进报告系统的重要性,特别关注较低层次的卫生设施,以提高孟加拉国生殖健康数据的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the quality of data for selected reproductive health indicators in designated public health facilities in Bangladesh.

Background: An effective health management information system plays a pivotal role in evidence-based decision-making and strengthening health service delivery in a country. The Directorate General of Health Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning of Bangladesh have adopted digital health management information system platforms named district health information system and management information system, respectively. Despite its significance, health management information system data has numerous issues, such as missing values, inaccuracies, lack of internal consistency, and the presence of outliers. This study aims to assess the data quality of reproductive health indicators in the health management information system of the Directorate General of Health Services and the Directorate General of Family Planning.

Methods: The study examined two aspects of data quality: a) completeness of data, subdivided into completeness of facility reporting (report submission rate) and completeness of indicator data (presence of missing values); b) internal consistency of reported data, subdivided into presence of outliers, inter-indicator consistency, and consistency between reported data and original records (accuracy rate). The study utilised retrospective monthly data gathered from July 2021 to June 2022, covering 21 reproductive health indicators. Multi-stage cluster sampling was employed to select 112 health facilities for data collection, including 48 facilities from Directorate General of Health Services and 64 from Directorate General of Family Planning, representing various administrative levels across the country.

Result: The report submission rate for Directorate General of Health Services facilities was 98%, while for the Directorate General of Family Planning facilities, it was 86%. However, 35% of data points were missing in the district health information system server of Directorate General of Health Services, whereas no missing values were observed in the management information system server of Directorate General of Family Planning. Less than 3% of outliers were detected in the server data of both directorates. Inter-indicator consistency was maintained at a high rate of 98% in health facilities under both directorates. The accuracy of reported data varied across indicators and facility types: Directorate General of Health Services facilities showed accuracy rates ranging between 75 and 92%, with an aggregated rate of 86%. Different tiers of the Directorate General of Family Planning facilities had accuracy rates ranging from 92 to 96%.

Conclusion: This research emphasises the significance of rectifying missing values, ensuring consistency, and improving reporting systems, with a particular focus on lower-tier health facilities, to enhance the validity and reliability of reproductive health data in Bangladesh.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Paediatric healthcare in Manhiça district through a gender lens: a retrospective analysis of 17 years of morbidity and demographic surveillance data. Spatial patterns and temporal trends in stillbirth, neonatal, and infant mortality: an exploration of country-level data from 2000 to 2021. The treatment responses among different inhalation therapies for GOLD group E patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The efficiency and productivity-changing trend of PHCIs since the 2009 health reform in China based on a three-stage DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index. Using calculations from the Lives Saved Tool in other global health modelling tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1