地震幸存者的情绪、应对和心理弹性:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Psychology Health & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1080/13548506.2024.2433540
Nazan Turan, Kök Eren Hülya, Gökçe Banu Acar Gül
{"title":"地震幸存者的情绪、应对和心理弹性:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Nazan Turan, Kök Eren Hülya, Gökçe Banu Acar Gül","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2024.2433540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Earthquakes may play a role in the development of several psychological distresses or psychopathologies. Nevertheless, protective factors such as positive emotions, psychological flexibility, and coping mechanisms may be helpful for earthquake survivors in coping. On the other hand, the role of both positive and negative emotions of earthquake survivors in psychological flexibility and coping remains elusive. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine the relationship between emotions, coping, and psychological flexibility levels of earthquake survivors considering positive and negative emotions together. A total of 330 adult participants of the cross-sectional study completed the Participant Information Form, Perceived Ability to Cope with Trauma (PACT), Psychological Flexibility (PF), and Positive-Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scales. Participants were aged between 20 and 68 years (Mean ± SD = 42.42 + 12.88). It was determined that as the PACT levels increased, the PF and negative emotion levels increased yet positive emotion levels decreased. As the PF levels increased, the negative emotion levels increased yet the positive emotion levels decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.01). According to the established model, it was concluded that the PACT was related to positive-negative emotion levels and values, being in the moment, and dissociation sub-dimensions of PF were unrelated to contextual self and acceptance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In conclusion, positive-negative emotions and PF were found to have a mediating role in the coping of earthquake survivors. Mental health professionals may contribute to increasing PACT in earthquake survivors through interventions aimed at maintaining positive emotions, recognizing negative emotions, and increasing PF.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotions, coping and psychological flexibility in earthquake survivors: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Nazan Turan, Kök Eren Hülya, Gökçe Banu Acar Gül\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2024.2433540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Earthquakes may play a role in the development of several psychological distresses or psychopathologies. Nevertheless, protective factors such as positive emotions, psychological flexibility, and coping mechanisms may be helpful for earthquake survivors in coping. On the other hand, the role of both positive and negative emotions of earthquake survivors in psychological flexibility and coping remains elusive. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine the relationship between emotions, coping, and psychological flexibility levels of earthquake survivors considering positive and negative emotions together. A total of 330 adult participants of the cross-sectional study completed the Participant Information Form, Perceived Ability to Cope with Trauma (PACT), Psychological Flexibility (PF), and Positive-Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scales. Participants were aged between 20 and 68 years (Mean ± SD = 42.42 + 12.88). It was determined that as the PACT levels increased, the PF and negative emotion levels increased yet positive emotion levels decreased. As the PF levels increased, the negative emotion levels increased yet the positive emotion levels decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.01). According to the established model, it was concluded that the PACT was related to positive-negative emotion levels and values, being in the moment, and dissociation sub-dimensions of PF were unrelated to contextual self and acceptance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In conclusion, positive-negative emotions and PF were found to have a mediating role in the coping of earthquake survivors. Mental health professionals may contribute to increasing PACT in earthquake survivors through interventions aimed at maintaining positive emotions, recognizing negative emotions, and increasing PF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2433540\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2024.2433540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地震可能在一些心理困扰或精神病理的发展中起作用。然而,积极情绪、心理灵活性和应对机制等保护性因素可能对地震幸存者的应对有所帮助。另一方面,地震幸存者的积极情绪和消极情绪在心理灵活性和应对中的作用尚不明确。因此,本研究旨在探讨地震幸存者情绪、应对和心理弹性水平之间的关系,同时考虑积极情绪和消极情绪。横断面研究共有330名成年参与者完成了参与者信息表、创伤应对能力(PACT)、心理灵活性(PF)和积极-消极影响量表(PANAS)。参与者年龄在20 ~ 68岁之间(Mean±SD = 42.42 + 12.88)。结果表明,随着PACT水平的增加,PF和消极情绪水平增加,而积极情绪水平下降。随着PF水平的升高,消极情绪水平升高,积极情绪水平降低(p < 0.05)。综上所述,积极-消极情绪和PF对地震幸存者的应对有中介作用。心理健康专业人员可以通过旨在维持积极情绪、识别消极情绪和增加PF的干预措施来提高地震幸存者的PACT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emotions, coping and psychological flexibility in earthquake survivors: a cross-sectional study.

Earthquakes may play a role in the development of several psychological distresses or psychopathologies. Nevertheless, protective factors such as positive emotions, psychological flexibility, and coping mechanisms may be helpful for earthquake survivors in coping. On the other hand, the role of both positive and negative emotions of earthquake survivors in psychological flexibility and coping remains elusive. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine the relationship between emotions, coping, and psychological flexibility levels of earthquake survivors considering positive and negative emotions together. A total of 330 adult participants of the cross-sectional study completed the Participant Information Form, Perceived Ability to Cope with Trauma (PACT), Psychological Flexibility (PF), and Positive-Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scales. Participants were aged between 20 and 68 years (Mean ± SD = 42.42 + 12.88). It was determined that as the PACT levels increased, the PF and negative emotion levels increased yet positive emotion levels decreased. As the PF levels increased, the negative emotion levels increased yet the positive emotion levels decreased (p < 0.01). According to the established model, it was concluded that the PACT was related to positive-negative emotion levels and values, being in the moment, and dissociation sub-dimensions of PF were unrelated to contextual self and acceptance (p > 0.05). In conclusion, positive-negative emotions and PF were found to have a mediating role in the coping of earthquake survivors. Mental health professionals may contribute to increasing PACT in earthquake survivors through interventions aimed at maintaining positive emotions, recognizing negative emotions, and increasing PF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
期刊最新文献
Sleep actigraphy results and HIV health outcomes in an urban HIV clinic sample. Facets of mindfulness are associated with inflammation biomarkers in a sample of sexual minority men with HIV. Active surveillance for prostate cancer is a shared journey: the dyadic perspective. Impact of mental disorders on low adherence to antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV in Spain. The association between caregiver burden, social capital, and family functioning among caregivers of older adults with PSD - A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1