血清GFAP和UCH-L1用于鉴别法国儿童临床重要的创伤性脑损伤:诊断准确性亚研究

The Lancet. Child & adolescent health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00295-5
Antoine Puravet, Charlotte Oris, Bruno Pereira, Samy Kahouadji, Philippe Gonzalo, Damien Masson, Julie Durif, Catherine Sarret, Vincent Sapin, Damien Bouvier
{"title":"血清GFAP和UCH-L1用于鉴别法国儿童临床重要的创伤性脑损伤:诊断准确性亚研究","authors":"Antoine Puravet, Charlotte Oris, Bruno Pereira, Samy Kahouadji, Philippe Gonzalo, Damien Masson, Julie Durif, Catherine Sarret, Vincent Sapin, Damien Bouvier","doi":"10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00295-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 13 and 15, undergo hospitalisation or cranial CT (CCT) scans despite the absence of clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI; ie, hospitalisation >2 days associated with intracranial lesions on CCT, neurosurgical intervention, intensive care admission, or death). Clinical algorithms have reduced CCT scans and hospitalisations by 10%. We aimed to established age-appropriate reference values for GFAP and UCH-L1 and evaluate their diagnostic test performance in identifying ciTBI in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a diagnostic test accuracy substudy within the PROS100B stepped wedge cluster randomised trial that included children aged 16 years or younger, clinically managed within 3 h of mTBI, with a GCS score of 15 requiring hospitalisation or CCT scan according to French Pediatric Society guidelines (equivalent to the intermediate risk group of the PECARN algorithm). Enrolment for PROS100B occurred from Nov 1, 2016, to Oct 31, 2021, at 11 hospital emergency departments in France. Stored blood samples collected from March 1, 2015, to Oct 31, 2015, from children aged 16 years or younger who were outpatients for allergic conditions unrelated to mTBI and free of neurological disease were used as a control group to calculate reference values of GFAP and UCH-L1 across four age groups (<6 months, 6 months to <2 years, 2 years to <4 years, and 4 years to <16 years). The diagnostic test performance of GFAP and UCH-L1, both above the reference range to identify ciTBI, was evaluated in the children with mTBI. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured with the Alinity analyser (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Reference values were calculated from GFAP and UCH-L1 measured in samples from 718 control children (378 [53%] boys and 340 [47%] girls). 531 children (334 [63%] boys and 197 [37%] girls) aged 0-16 years with mTBI were included. By applying our reference values for GFAP and UCH-L1 across four age groups the biomarker combination (both biomarkers above reference ranges) had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 69-100), a negative predictive value of 100% (99-100), a specificity of 67% (63-71), a positive likelihood ratio of 3·01 (2·67-3·40), a negative likelihood ratio of 0, and an area under the curve of 0·83 (0·81-0·85) in identifying ciTBI.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 identify ciTBI in children with 100% sensitivity and 67% specificity, which could potentially reduce unnecessary CCT scans and hospitalisations in children with mTBI if implemented.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>French Ministry of Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94246,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet. Child & adolescent health","volume":" ","pages":"47-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for the identification of clinically important traumatic brain injury in children in France: a diagnostic accuracy substudy.\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Puravet, Charlotte Oris, Bruno Pereira, Samy Kahouadji, Philippe Gonzalo, Damien Masson, Julie Durif, Catherine Sarret, Vincent Sapin, Damien Bouvier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00295-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 13 and 15, undergo hospitalisation or cranial CT (CCT) scans despite the absence of clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI; ie, hospitalisation >2 days associated with intracranial lesions on CCT, neurosurgical intervention, intensive care admission, or death). Clinical algorithms have reduced CCT scans and hospitalisations by 10%. We aimed to established age-appropriate reference values for GFAP and UCH-L1 and evaluate their diagnostic test performance in identifying ciTBI in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a diagnostic test accuracy substudy within the PROS100B stepped wedge cluster randomised trial that included children aged 16 years or younger, clinically managed within 3 h of mTBI, with a GCS score of 15 requiring hospitalisation or CCT scan according to French Pediatric Society guidelines (equivalent to the intermediate risk group of the PECARN algorithm). Enrolment for PROS100B occurred from Nov 1, 2016, to Oct 31, 2021, at 11 hospital emergency departments in France. Stored blood samples collected from March 1, 2015, to Oct 31, 2015, from children aged 16 years or younger who were outpatients for allergic conditions unrelated to mTBI and free of neurological disease were used as a control group to calculate reference values of GFAP and UCH-L1 across four age groups (<6 months, 6 months to <2 years, 2 years to <4 years, and 4 years to <16 years). The diagnostic test performance of GFAP and UCH-L1, both above the reference range to identify ciTBI, was evaluated in the children with mTBI. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured with the Alinity analyser (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Reference values were calculated from GFAP and UCH-L1 measured in samples from 718 control children (378 [53%] boys and 340 [47%] girls). 531 children (334 [63%] boys and 197 [37%] girls) aged 0-16 years with mTBI were included. By applying our reference values for GFAP and UCH-L1 across four age groups the biomarker combination (both biomarkers above reference ranges) had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 69-100), a negative predictive value of 100% (99-100), a specificity of 67% (63-71), a positive likelihood ratio of 3·01 (2·67-3·40), a negative likelihood ratio of 0, and an area under the curve of 0·83 (0·81-0·85) in identifying ciTBI.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 identify ciTBI in children with 100% sensitivity and 67% specificity, which could potentially reduce unnecessary CCT scans and hospitalisations in children with mTBI if implemented.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>French Ministry of Health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet. Child & adolescent health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"47-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet. Child & adolescent health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00295-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet. Child & adolescent health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00295-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多患有轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)的儿童,由格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分在13到15之间定义,尽管没有临床上重要的创伤性脑损伤(ciTBI;例如,住院时间(2天)与CCT颅内病变、神经外科干预、重症监护住院或死亡相关。临床算法将CCT扫描和住院率降低了10%。我们的目的是建立与年龄相适应的GFAP和UCH-L1的参考值,并评估它们在识别儿童ciTBI中的诊断测试性能。方法:本研究是PROS100B阶梯楔形聚类随机试验中的诊断测试准确性亚研究,该试验包括16岁或以下的儿童,在mTBI后3小时内进行临床管理,GCS评分为15,根据法国儿科学会指南需要住院或CCT扫描(相当于PECARN算法的中间风险组)。PROS100B于2016年11月1日至2021年10月31日在法国11家医院急诊科入组。从2015年3月1日至2015年10月31日收集的16岁及以下非mTBI过敏门诊患者的血液样本作为对照组,计算四个年龄组GFAP和UCH-L1的参考值(研究结果:从718名对照儿童(378名[53%]男孩和340名[47%]女孩)样本中测量的GFAP和UCH-L1计算参考值)。纳入531名0-16岁mTBI儿童(男孩334例(63%),女孩197例(37%))。通过应用我们的GFAP和UCH-L1在四个年龄组的参考值,生物标志物组合(两个生物标志物均高于参考值范围)在识别ciTBI方面的敏感性为100% (95% CI 69-100),阴性预测值为100%(99-100),特异性为67%(63-71),阳性似然比为3.01(2.67 - 3.40),阴性似然比为0,曲线下面积为0.83(0.81 - 0.85)。解释:血清GFAP和UCH-L1识别儿童ciTBI的敏感性为100%,特异性为67%,如果实施,可能会减少mTBI儿童不必要的CCT扫描和住院治疗。资助:法国卫生部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for the identification of clinically important traumatic brain injury in children in France: a diagnostic accuracy substudy.

Background: Many children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 13 and 15, undergo hospitalisation or cranial CT (CCT) scans despite the absence of clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI; ie, hospitalisation >2 days associated with intracranial lesions on CCT, neurosurgical intervention, intensive care admission, or death). Clinical algorithms have reduced CCT scans and hospitalisations by 10%. We aimed to established age-appropriate reference values for GFAP and UCH-L1 and evaluate their diagnostic test performance in identifying ciTBI in children.

Methods: This study was a diagnostic test accuracy substudy within the PROS100B stepped wedge cluster randomised trial that included children aged 16 years or younger, clinically managed within 3 h of mTBI, with a GCS score of 15 requiring hospitalisation or CCT scan according to French Pediatric Society guidelines (equivalent to the intermediate risk group of the PECARN algorithm). Enrolment for PROS100B occurred from Nov 1, 2016, to Oct 31, 2021, at 11 hospital emergency departments in France. Stored blood samples collected from March 1, 2015, to Oct 31, 2015, from children aged 16 years or younger who were outpatients for allergic conditions unrelated to mTBI and free of neurological disease were used as a control group to calculate reference values of GFAP and UCH-L1 across four age groups (<6 months, 6 months to <2 years, 2 years to <4 years, and 4 years to <16 years). The diagnostic test performance of GFAP and UCH-L1, both above the reference range to identify ciTBI, was evaluated in the children with mTBI. GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured with the Alinity analyser (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA).

Findings: Reference values were calculated from GFAP and UCH-L1 measured in samples from 718 control children (378 [53%] boys and 340 [47%] girls). 531 children (334 [63%] boys and 197 [37%] girls) aged 0-16 years with mTBI were included. By applying our reference values for GFAP and UCH-L1 across four age groups the biomarker combination (both biomarkers above reference ranges) had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 69-100), a negative predictive value of 100% (99-100), a specificity of 67% (63-71), a positive likelihood ratio of 3·01 (2·67-3·40), a negative likelihood ratio of 0, and an area under the curve of 0·83 (0·81-0·85) in identifying ciTBI.

Interpretation: Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 identify ciTBI in children with 100% sensitivity and 67% specificity, which could potentially reduce unnecessary CCT scans and hospitalisations in children with mTBI if implemented.

Funding: French Ministry of Health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A toolbox for innovative paediatric research. Adapt to survive and thrive: the time is now for adaptive platform trials for preterm birth. Political will to tackle childhood violence in Latin America. Timeliness and value of individual participant data meta-analyses in paediatric tuberculosis research. Admission to acute medical wards for mental health concerns among children and young people in England from 2012 to 2022: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1