Adewale A Bakare, Jesus R Varela, Jacob Mazza, Ruth Saganty, Gibson Reine, John Stathopoulos, Harel Deutsch, John E O'Toole, Ricardo B V Fontes, Richard G Fessler, Vincent C Traynelis
{"title":"多节段颈椎前路与后路融合术后30天围手术期并发症对患者报告结果影响的比较分析","authors":"Adewale A Bakare, Jesus R Varela, Jacob Mazza, Ruth Saganty, Gibson Reine, John Stathopoulos, Harel Deutsch, John E O'Toole, Ricardo B V Fontes, Richard G Fessler, Vincent C Traynelis","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many studies have compared outcomes following anterior and posterior cervical fusion, yet the differences in the impacts of perioperative complications on outcomes have not been well studied. This study aimed to assess the differences in the effects of 30-day perioperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after multilevel anterior versus posterior cervical fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients who underwent anterior or posterior cervical fusion at three or more levels between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed. Each group was subdivided based on the occurrence and severity of perioperative complication: no complication versus minor complication versus major complication. The study primarily compared PROMs and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) within and between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 anterior (102 with no complications, 36 with minor complications, 8 with major complications) and 55 posterior (36 with no complications, 13 with minor complications, 6 with major complications) cervical fusion cases were analyzed. Within the anterior or posterior group, there were no significant differences in the PROM change or proportions of patients achieving the MCID. In comparing the anterior group with the posterior group, anterior patients without complications had better improvement in the 3-month Neck Disability Index (coefficient 11.2, p = 0.019), with higher odds of achieving the MCID for the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 3 months (OR 2.0, p = 0.039). Otherwise, there were no significant differences in the PROM change or proportions of patients achieving the MCID in subsets of anterior or posterior patients with minor or major complications. Furthermore, patients with major complications had higher early readmission rates regardless of the surgical approach. Major complications were also associated with longer and increased rates of intensive care unit stays after posterior fusion compared with anterior fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the severity of perioperative complications following anterior or posterior cervical fusion did not predict changes in PROMs or achievement of MCIDs in the anterior or posterior group. Also, PROMs may not fully differentiate the full extent of the impact of perioperative complications following anterior versus posterior cervical fusion. Otherwise, in subsets of patients without complications, anterior compared with posterior patients had improved Neck Disability Index scores at 3 months, with a significant proportion of patients achieving the MCID for the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 3 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of the impacts of 30-day perioperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures following multilevel anterior versus posterior cervical fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Adewale A Bakare, Jesus R Varela, Jacob Mazza, Ruth Saganty, Gibson Reine, John Stathopoulos, Harel Deutsch, John E O'Toole, Ricardo B V Fontes, Richard G Fessler, Vincent C Traynelis\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many studies have compared outcomes following anterior and posterior cervical fusion, yet the differences in the impacts of perioperative complications on outcomes have not been well studied. This study aimed to assess the differences in the effects of 30-day perioperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after multilevel anterior versus posterior cervical fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients who underwent anterior or posterior cervical fusion at three or more levels between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed. Each group was subdivided based on the occurrence and severity of perioperative complication: no complication versus minor complication versus major complication. The study primarily compared PROMs and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) within and between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 anterior (102 with no complications, 36 with minor complications, 8 with major complications) and 55 posterior (36 with no complications, 13 with minor complications, 6 with major complications) cervical fusion cases were analyzed. Within the anterior or posterior group, there were no significant differences in the PROM change or proportions of patients achieving the MCID. In comparing the anterior group with the posterior group, anterior patients without complications had better improvement in the 3-month Neck Disability Index (coefficient 11.2, p = 0.019), with higher odds of achieving the MCID for the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 3 months (OR 2.0, p = 0.039). Otherwise, there were no significant differences in the PROM change or proportions of patients achieving the MCID in subsets of anterior or posterior patients with minor or major complications. Furthermore, patients with major complications had higher early readmission rates regardless of the surgical approach. Major complications were also associated with longer and increased rates of intensive care unit stays after posterior fusion compared with anterior fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the severity of perioperative complications following anterior or posterior cervical fusion did not predict changes in PROMs or achievement of MCIDs in the anterior or posterior group. Also, PROMs may not fully differentiate the full extent of the impact of perioperative complications following anterior versus posterior cervical fusion. Otherwise, in subsets of patients without complications, anterior compared with posterior patients had improved Neck Disability Index scores at 3 months, with a significant proportion of patients achieving the MCID for the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 3 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24257\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.SPINE24257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:许多研究比较了颈椎前后路融合术的结果,但围手术期并发症对结果的影响的差异尚未得到很好的研究。本研究旨在评估多节段颈椎前后融合术后30天围手术期并发症对患者报告的预后指标(PROMs)的影响差异。方法:对2014年至2020年间接受三个或三个以上颈椎前路或后路融合术的成年患者进行分析。各组根据围手术期并发症的发生及严重程度进行细分:无并发症、轻微并发症、严重并发症。该研究主要比较了组内和组间的PROMs和最小临床重要差异(MCIDs)。结果:共分析146例前路颈椎融合(无并发症102例,轻微并发症36例,严重并发症8例)和55例后路颈椎融合(无并发症36例,轻微并发症13例,严重并发症6例)。在前路组和后路组中,在胎膜早破改变或达到MCID的患者比例方面没有显著差异。前路组与后路组比较,无并发症的前路患者3个月颈部残疾指数改善更好(系数11.2,p = 0.019), 3个月达到改良日本骨科协会评分MCID的几率更高(OR 2.0, p = 0.039)。除此之外,在有轻微或严重并发症的前路或后路患者亚群中,PROM改变或达到MCID的患者比例没有显著差异。此外,无论采用何种手术方式,有主要并发症的患者早期再入院率较高。与前路融合术相比,主要并发症也与后路融合术后重症监护病房停留时间更长和增加有关。结论:本研究表明,颈椎前后路融合术后围手术期并发症的严重程度并不能预测前后路融合术组PROMs的变化或MCIDs的实现。此外,PROMs可能不能完全区分颈椎前后融合术后围手术期并发症的影响程度。此外,在无并发症的患者亚群中,与后路患者相比,前路患者在3个月时颈部残疾指数评分有所改善,在3个月时达到修正日本骨科协会评分的MCID的患者比例很大。
Comparative analysis of the impacts of 30-day perioperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures following multilevel anterior versus posterior cervical fusion.
Objective: Many studies have compared outcomes following anterior and posterior cervical fusion, yet the differences in the impacts of perioperative complications on outcomes have not been well studied. This study aimed to assess the differences in the effects of 30-day perioperative complications on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after multilevel anterior versus posterior cervical fusion.
Methods: Adult patients who underwent anterior or posterior cervical fusion at three or more levels between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed. Each group was subdivided based on the occurrence and severity of perioperative complication: no complication versus minor complication versus major complication. The study primarily compared PROMs and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) within and between the groups.
Results: A total of 146 anterior (102 with no complications, 36 with minor complications, 8 with major complications) and 55 posterior (36 with no complications, 13 with minor complications, 6 with major complications) cervical fusion cases were analyzed. Within the anterior or posterior group, there were no significant differences in the PROM change or proportions of patients achieving the MCID. In comparing the anterior group with the posterior group, anterior patients without complications had better improvement in the 3-month Neck Disability Index (coefficient 11.2, p = 0.019), with higher odds of achieving the MCID for the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 3 months (OR 2.0, p = 0.039). Otherwise, there were no significant differences in the PROM change or proportions of patients achieving the MCID in subsets of anterior or posterior patients with minor or major complications. Furthermore, patients with major complications had higher early readmission rates regardless of the surgical approach. Major complications were also associated with longer and increased rates of intensive care unit stays after posterior fusion compared with anterior fusion.
Conclusions: This study suggests that the severity of perioperative complications following anterior or posterior cervical fusion did not predict changes in PROMs or achievement of MCIDs in the anterior or posterior group. Also, PROMs may not fully differentiate the full extent of the impact of perioperative complications following anterior versus posterior cervical fusion. Otherwise, in subsets of patients without complications, anterior compared with posterior patients had improved Neck Disability Index scores at 3 months, with a significant proportion of patients achieving the MCID for the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at 3 months.
期刊介绍:
Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.