“我们是精英企业家的专家”:呼吁将边缘人群纳入创业研究

IF 3.1 Q2 MANAGEMENT Research in Organizational Behavior Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2024.100206
Kylie J. Hwang, Damon J. Phillips
{"title":"“我们是精英企业家的专家”:呼吁将边缘人群纳入创业研究","authors":"Kylie J. Hwang,&nbsp;Damon J. Phillips","doi":"10.1016/j.riob.2024.100206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scholarship on entrepreneurship in top management journals has disproportionately focused on elites, leading our field to develop a great deal of understanding about a select few in society. Collectively, this bias has led to deeper expertise on elite entrepreneurs relative to entrepreneurs with different backgrounds, such as those from marginalized populations. We note the conceptual and prescriptive limitations of this traditional focus and draw attention to the importance of integrating research involving individuals from marginalized populations to improve our theories and prescriptions. Centering our discussion on the relationship between entrepreneurship and employment, we explore the focus on elites in top management journals, highlight exceptions to this focus, and propose a set of research questions as a path to more integrated and robust scholarship on entrepreneurship as represented in top management journals. In particular, we explore ways that our field can better understand when and how employment leads to entrepreneurship, how to better theorize the relationship between one’s past entrepreneurial experience and subsequent employment, and how a richer set of entrepreneurial outcomes can be examined. In each of these cases, we argue that integrating marginalized populations is not merely a matter of representativeness but is essential for strengthening our conceptual frameworks and analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56178,"journal":{"name":"Research in Organizational Behavior","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“We are experts on elite entrepreneurs”: A call to integrate marginalized populations into entrepreneurship research\",\"authors\":\"Kylie J. Hwang,&nbsp;Damon J. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.riob.2024.100206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Scholarship on entrepreneurship in top management journals has disproportionately focused on elites, leading our field to develop a great deal of understanding about a select few in society. Collectively, this bias has led to deeper expertise on elite entrepreneurs relative to entrepreneurs with different backgrounds, such as those from marginalized populations. We note the conceptual and prescriptive limitations of this traditional focus and draw attention to the importance of integrating research involving individuals from marginalized populations to improve our theories and prescriptions. Centering our discussion on the relationship between entrepreneurship and employment, we explore the focus on elites in top management journals, highlight exceptions to this focus, and propose a set of research questions as a path to more integrated and robust scholarship on entrepreneurship as represented in top management journals. In particular, we explore ways that our field can better understand when and how employment leads to entrepreneurship, how to better theorize the relationship between one’s past entrepreneurial experience and subsequent employment, and how a richer set of entrepreneurial outcomes can be examined. In each of these cases, we argue that integrating marginalized populations is not merely a matter of representativeness but is essential for strengthening our conceptual frameworks and analyses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Organizational Behavior\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Organizational Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191308524000029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191308524000029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

顶级管理期刊上关于企业家精神的学术研究不成比例地集中在精英身上,导致我们的领域对社会中少数人有了大量的了解。总的来说,这种偏见导致对精英企业家的专业知识要比来自不同背景的企业家(比如来自边缘人群的企业家)更深入。我们注意到这一传统焦点在概念和规范上的局限性,并提请注意将涉及边缘人口的个人的研究纳入改进我们的理论和处方的重要性。围绕企业家精神与就业之间的关系,我们探讨了高层管理期刊对精英的关注,强调了这种关注的例外情况,并提出了一系列研究问题,作为通往高层管理期刊中所代表的更全面、更强大的企业家精神学术研究的途径。特别是,我们探索了我们的领域可以更好地理解就业何时以及如何导致创业的方法,如何更好地将过去的创业经历与随后的就业之间的关系理论化,以及如何检验更丰富的创业成果。在每一种情况下,我们都认为,融入边缘化人口不仅是代表性问题,而且对加强我们的概念框架和分析至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“We are experts on elite entrepreneurs”: A call to integrate marginalized populations into entrepreneurship research
Scholarship on entrepreneurship in top management journals has disproportionately focused on elites, leading our field to develop a great deal of understanding about a select few in society. Collectively, this bias has led to deeper expertise on elite entrepreneurs relative to entrepreneurs with different backgrounds, such as those from marginalized populations. We note the conceptual and prescriptive limitations of this traditional focus and draw attention to the importance of integrating research involving individuals from marginalized populations to improve our theories and prescriptions. Centering our discussion on the relationship between entrepreneurship and employment, we explore the focus on elites in top management journals, highlight exceptions to this focus, and propose a set of research questions as a path to more integrated and robust scholarship on entrepreneurship as represented in top management journals. In particular, we explore ways that our field can better understand when and how employment leads to entrepreneurship, how to better theorize the relationship between one’s past entrepreneurial experience and subsequent employment, and how a richer set of entrepreneurial outcomes can be examined. In each of these cases, we argue that integrating marginalized populations is not merely a matter of representativeness but is essential for strengthening our conceptual frameworks and analyses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Organizational Behavior
Research in Organizational Behavior Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Research in Organizational Behavior publishes commissioned papers only, spanning several levels of analysis, and ranging from studies of individuals to groups to organizations and their environments. The topics encompassed are likewise diverse, covering issues from individual emotion and cognition to social movements and networks. Cutting across this diversity, however, is a rather consistent quality of presentation. Being both thorough and thoughtful, Research in Organizational Behavior is commissioned pieces provide substantial contributions to research on organizations. Many have received rewards for their level of scholarship and many have become classics in the field of organizational research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The (re)production of inequality in evaluations: A unifying framework outlining the drivers of gender and racial differences in evaluative outcomes From boundaryless to boundary-crossing: Toward a friction-based model of career transitions and job performance A theoretical framework for social norm perception Mobilization capacity: Tracing the path from having networks to capturing resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1