免疫检查点抑制剂在人表皮生长因子受体2阴性、晚期转移性或不可切除胃癌中的应用:基于个体患者数据重建和二次分析的疗效评估

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.014
Ning Deng, Zhijing Yan, Shengpeng Wang, Menghuan Song, Hao Hu
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂在人表皮生长因子受体2阴性、晚期转移性或不可切除胃癌中的应用:基于个体患者数据重建和二次分析的疗效评估","authors":"Ning Deng, Zhijing Yan, Shengpeng Wang, Menghuan Song, Hao Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The efficacy of several novel combinations of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand antibodies with chemotherapy, which have become the new standard first-line combination therapy with favorable outcomes, was still not certain in patients with different combined positive score (CPS) grades. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy or immunochemotherapy at different CPS grades, compared with chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve reconstruction was employed to assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with gastric cancer. The graphical reconstruction algorithm was used to estimate the time-to-event outcomes from Kaplan-Meier curves of the overall cohort or reported subgroups (depending on CPS). KMSubtraction was used to derive the unreported survival data by matching participants in the overall cohort and known subgroups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This analysis included 5072 patients in 5 trials (CheckMate 649, KEYNOTE-859, ORIENT-16, KEYNOTE-062, and JAVELIN Gastric 100). Immunochemotherapy exhibited more effectiveness than chemotherapy in most cases. For the overall cohort, sintilimab + chemotherapy exhibited the best effect in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.76). Nivolumab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84), sintilimab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65), and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81) exhibited favorable outcomes in OS in patients with a CPS ≥1, 5, and 10, respectively, and similarly in PFS. Avelumab + chemotherapy performed similarly to chemotherapy in OS but had poor PFS in the reported subgroup.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Finding suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy could enrich patients with benefits regardless of CPS grades, though subtle efficacy in low CPS subgroups. This study compared the efficacy of different immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer, but we acknowledge some differences between reconstructed and original data. Hopefully there will be more research investigating comparisons between current therapies rather than with chemotherapy only in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, Advanced Metastatic, or Unresectable Gastric Cancer Under All Combined Positive Score Grading: Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Individual Patient Data Reconstruction and Secondary Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Ning Deng, Zhijing Yan, Shengpeng Wang, Menghuan Song, Hao Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The efficacy of several novel combinations of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand antibodies with chemotherapy, which have become the new standard first-line combination therapy with favorable outcomes, was still not certain in patients with different combined positive score (CPS) grades. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy or immunochemotherapy at different CPS grades, compared with chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve reconstruction was employed to assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with gastric cancer. The graphical reconstruction algorithm was used to estimate the time-to-event outcomes from Kaplan-Meier curves of the overall cohort or reported subgroups (depending on CPS). KMSubtraction was used to derive the unreported survival data by matching participants in the overall cohort and known subgroups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This analysis included 5072 patients in 5 trials (CheckMate 649, KEYNOTE-859, ORIENT-16, KEYNOTE-062, and JAVELIN Gastric 100). Immunochemotherapy exhibited more effectiveness than chemotherapy in most cases. For the overall cohort, sintilimab + chemotherapy exhibited the best effect in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.76). Nivolumab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84), sintilimab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65), and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81) exhibited favorable outcomes in OS in patients with a CPS ≥1, 5, and 10, respectively, and similarly in PFS. Avelumab + chemotherapy performed similarly to chemotherapy in OS but had poor PFS in the reported subgroup.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Finding suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy could enrich patients with benefits regardless of CPS grades, though subtle efficacy in low CPS subgroups. This study compared the efficacy of different immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer, but we acknowledge some differences between reconstructed and original data. Hopefully there will be more research investigating comparisons between current therapies rather than with chemotherapy only in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.11.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:几种新型抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1或其配体抗体联合化疗已成为一线联合治疗的新标准,疗效良好,但在不同联合阳性评分(CPS)等级的患者中,其疗效尚不确定。本研究旨在评价免疫检查点抑制剂免疫治疗或免疫化疗在不同CPS分级下与化疗相比的疗效。方法:采用Kaplan-Meier (KM)曲线重建法评估胃癌患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。图形重建算法用于估计整个队列或报告的亚组(取决于CPS)的Kaplan-Meier曲线的时间到事件结果。使用KMSubtraction通过匹配整个队列和已知亚组的参与者来获得未报告的生存数据。结果:该分析包括5项试验的5072例患者(CheckMate 649, KEYNOTE-859, ORIENT-16, KEYNOTE-062和JAVELIN Gastric 100)。免疫化疗在大多数情况下比化疗更有效。对于整个队列,辛替单抗+化疗对OS的效果最好(风险比[HR], 0.65;95% ci, 0.55-0.76)。纳武单抗+化疗(HR, 0.75;95% CI, 0.67-0.84),辛替单抗+化疗(HR, 0.52;95% CI, 0.41-0.65),派姆单抗+化疗(HR, 0.68;95% CI, 0.58-0.81)在CPS分别≥1,5和10的患者中显示出良好的OS结果,在PFS中也是如此。Avelumab +化疗在OS中的表现与化疗相似,但在报告的亚组中PFS较差。研究结果表明,免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗可以使患者获益,无论CPS等级如何,尽管在低CPS亚组中效果微妙。本研究比较了不同免疫疗法联合化疗对胃癌患者的疗效,但我们承认重建数据与原始数据之间存在一些差异。希望将来会有更多的研究来调查当前治疗方法之间的比较,而不是仅仅与化疗进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilization of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, Advanced Metastatic, or Unresectable Gastric Cancer Under All Combined Positive Score Grading: Evaluation of Efficacy Based on Individual Patient Data Reconstruction and Secondary Analyses.

Purpose: The efficacy of several novel combinations of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand antibodies with chemotherapy, which have become the new standard first-line combination therapy with favorable outcomes, was still not certain in patients with different combined positive score (CPS) grades. This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy or immunochemotherapy at different CPS grades, compared with chemotherapy.

Methods: Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve reconstruction was employed to assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with gastric cancer. The graphical reconstruction algorithm was used to estimate the time-to-event outcomes from Kaplan-Meier curves of the overall cohort or reported subgroups (depending on CPS). KMSubtraction was used to derive the unreported survival data by matching participants in the overall cohort and known subgroups.

Findings: This analysis included 5072 patients in 5 trials (CheckMate 649, KEYNOTE-859, ORIENT-16, KEYNOTE-062, and JAVELIN Gastric 100). Immunochemotherapy exhibited more effectiveness than chemotherapy in most cases. For the overall cohort, sintilimab + chemotherapy exhibited the best effect in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.76). Nivolumab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84), sintilimab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65), and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81) exhibited favorable outcomes in OS in patients with a CPS ≥1, 5, and 10, respectively, and similarly in PFS. Avelumab + chemotherapy performed similarly to chemotherapy in OS but had poor PFS in the reported subgroup.

Implications: Finding suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy could enrich patients with benefits regardless of CPS grades, though subtle efficacy in low CPS subgroups. This study compared the efficacy of different immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer, but we acknowledge some differences between reconstructed and original data. Hopefully there will be more research investigating comparisons between current therapies rather than with chemotherapy only in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
Bioequivalence of Water-Soluble Progesterone Injection (GenSci070) in Healthy Chinese Postmenopausal Women Volunteers. Potential of Albumin-Bilirubin Score for Estimating the Voriconazole-Induced Hepatotoxicity Undergoing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Vancomycin Dosing in Patients on Intermittent Hemodialysis-A Retrospective Study. Efficacy of Apheresis in the Remission of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Efficacy of Oral Medication in Weight Loss Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1