优化糖尿病酮症酸中毒的风险分层:使用观察数据重新评估酸碱状态和高渗透压。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal and Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1007/s11739-024-03818-x
Sebastiaan Paul Blank, Ruth Miriam Blank
{"title":"优化糖尿病酮症酸中毒的风险分层:使用观察数据重新评估酸碱状态和高渗透压。","authors":"Sebastiaan Paul Blank, Ruth Miriam Blank","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03818-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate assessment of severity in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) can optimise early management and facilitate prioritisation for high acuity care. The primary aim was to evaluate the relationship between severity of acidosis (considering pH, bicarbonate, and anion gap) and hyperosmolarity with hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care mortality, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor/inotrope use, and dialysis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adults (≥ 16 yr) with DKA admitted to US intensive care units. Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV dataset and eICU Collaborative Research Database. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate biochemistry obtained within 4 h of admission and the primary and secondary outcomes. We identified 4071 eligible admissions. There was no clear relationship between serum bicarbonate or anion gap and any outcome. Almost half the population did not have blood gas analysis within 4 h of admission; for 2292 patients with blood gases available, pH < 7 and inappropriately high PCO<sub>2</sub> were associated with significant increases in mortality and all secondary outcomes. Osmolarity ≥ 320mosm/L was associated with fourfold increased mortality and higher rates of mechanical ventilation, use of vasopressors/inotropes, and dialysis. Failure of adaptive mechanisms (thirst and hyperventilation) indicating physiological decompensation may be more important for risk stratification in DKA than the degree of acidosis, which was only associated with outcome when severely abnormal. Blood gas analysis is essential to adequately assess disease severity as bicarbonate and anion gap were not predictive of outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising risk stratification in diabetic ketoacidosis: a re-evaluation of acid-base status and hyperosmolarity using observational data.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastiaan Paul Blank, Ruth Miriam Blank\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-024-03818-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate assessment of severity in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) can optimise early management and facilitate prioritisation for high acuity care. The primary aim was to evaluate the relationship between severity of acidosis (considering pH, bicarbonate, and anion gap) and hyperosmolarity with hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care mortality, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor/inotrope use, and dialysis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adults (≥ 16 yr) with DKA admitted to US intensive care units. Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV dataset and eICU Collaborative Research Database. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate biochemistry obtained within 4 h of admission and the primary and secondary outcomes. We identified 4071 eligible admissions. There was no clear relationship between serum bicarbonate or anion gap and any outcome. Almost half the population did not have blood gas analysis within 4 h of admission; for 2292 patients with blood gases available, pH < 7 and inappropriately high PCO<sub>2</sub> were associated with significant increases in mortality and all secondary outcomes. Osmolarity ≥ 320mosm/L was associated with fourfold increased mortality and higher rates of mechanical ventilation, use of vasopressors/inotropes, and dialysis. Failure of adaptive mechanisms (thirst and hyperventilation) indicating physiological decompensation may be more important for risk stratification in DKA than the degree of acidosis, which was only associated with outcome when severely abnormal. Blood gas analysis is essential to adequately assess disease severity as bicarbonate and anion gap were not predictive of outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03818-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03818-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确评估糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的严重程度可以优化早期管理并促进高敏度护理的优先级。主要目的是评估酸中毒严重程度(考虑pH值、碳酸氢盐和阴离子间隙)和高渗透压与住院死亡率之间的关系。次要结局包括重症监护死亡率、机械通气、血管加压药/肌力药物使用和透析。一项回顾性队列研究对美国重症监护病房收治的DKA成人(≥16岁)进行了研究。数据来自重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC)-IV数据集和eICU合作研究数据库。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析评估入院后4小时内的生化指标以及主要和次要结局。我们确定了4071名符合条件的招生。血清碳酸氢盐或阴离子间隙与任何结果之间没有明确的关系。近半数患者入院后4小时内未进行血气分析;在2292例可获得血气的患者中,pH值2与死亡率和所有次要结局的显著增加相关。渗透压≥320mosm/L与死亡率增加4倍、机械通气、使用血管加压剂/收缩性药物和透析相关。适应性机制(口渴和过度换气)的失败表明生理代偿失代偿可能比酸中毒程度更重要,酸中毒程度仅在严重异常时才与结果相关。血气分析对于充分评估疾病严重程度至关重要,因为碳酸氢盐和阴离子间隙不能预测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimising risk stratification in diabetic ketoacidosis: a re-evaluation of acid-base status and hyperosmolarity using observational data.

Accurate assessment of severity in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) can optimise early management and facilitate prioritisation for high acuity care. The primary aim was to evaluate the relationship between severity of acidosis (considering pH, bicarbonate, and anion gap) and hyperosmolarity with hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care mortality, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor/inotrope use, and dialysis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adults (≥ 16 yr) with DKA admitted to US intensive care units. Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV dataset and eICU Collaborative Research Database. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate biochemistry obtained within 4 h of admission and the primary and secondary outcomes. We identified 4071 eligible admissions. There was no clear relationship between serum bicarbonate or anion gap and any outcome. Almost half the population did not have blood gas analysis within 4 h of admission; for 2292 patients with blood gases available, pH < 7 and inappropriately high PCO2 were associated with significant increases in mortality and all secondary outcomes. Osmolarity ≥ 320mosm/L was associated with fourfold increased mortality and higher rates of mechanical ventilation, use of vasopressors/inotropes, and dialysis. Failure of adaptive mechanisms (thirst and hyperventilation) indicating physiological decompensation may be more important for risk stratification in DKA than the degree of acidosis, which was only associated with outcome when severely abnormal. Blood gas analysis is essential to adequately assess disease severity as bicarbonate and anion gap were not predictive of outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Cytisine for smoking cessation in hospitalised smokers with cardiovascular diseases: an observational study. Severe burn injuries and the impact of mental health: insights from 7 years at Switzerland's leading burn center. Comanagement of surgical patients between neurosurgeons and internal-medicine clinicians: observational cohort study. Linezolid-induced neuropathy in Nocardia pneumonia. Detection and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting or non-cardiac surgery: a survey by the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1