在德国,使用心肺复苏术反馈装置治疗院外心脏骤停:与改善rosc率相关,但使用频率不高,基于107,548例的登记分析

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110453
Andreas Friedrich Christoph Breuer-Kaiser, Rolf Lefering, Thomas Peter Weber, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Jan Wnent
{"title":"在德国,使用心肺复苏术反馈装置治疗院外心脏骤停:与改善rosc率相关,但使用频率不高,基于107,548例的登记分析","authors":"Andreas Friedrich Christoph Breuer-Kaiser, Rolf Lefering, Thomas Peter Weber, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Jan Wnent","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in Europe. Quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation, particularly of chest compressions, is crucial. Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices aim to enhance chest compression quality. Recent studies on these tools have reported improved outcomes for in-hospital but not for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This registry-based, retrospective study investigated the use of feedback-devices by emergency medical services personnel to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany and assessed its effect on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 107,548 records from the German Resuscitation Registry between 2015 and 2022 and compared patient outcomes of patients treated with feedback devices or not. ROSC rates both at any time and at hospital admission were compared to expected rates based on the \"Rosc After Cardiac Arrest\" (RACA) score. Furthermore, a generalized linear mixed methods model was calculated to receive an adjusted effect for those devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feedback-devices were used in 17.5% of cases overall, rising from 7.1% (2015) to 23.2% (2022). Patients resuscitated with feedback devices had a 2.6% higher rate of hospital admission with spontaneous circulation (35.9% vs. 33.3%). In both groups, the ROSC rates were higher than predicted by the RACA score. After multivariable adjustment we found a minor effect for RTAVF use on any ROSC (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.14), but no effect on the ROSC rate on admission (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We could show a minor association between the use of feedback devices and any ROSC, but not for ROSC on hospital admission, in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a generalized linear mixed model. Further research should address implementation strategies, sustainability and evaluate its effectiveness for other applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110453"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of CPR feedback devices to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany: Associated with improved ROSC-rates, but infrequent usage, in a registry-based analysis of 107,548 cases.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Friedrich Christoph Breuer-Kaiser, Rolf Lefering, Thomas Peter Weber, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Jan Wnent\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in Europe. Quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation, particularly of chest compressions, is crucial. Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices aim to enhance chest compression quality. Recent studies on these tools have reported improved outcomes for in-hospital but not for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This registry-based, retrospective study investigated the use of feedback-devices by emergency medical services personnel to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany and assessed its effect on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 107,548 records from the German Resuscitation Registry between 2015 and 2022 and compared patient outcomes of patients treated with feedback devices or not. ROSC rates both at any time and at hospital admission were compared to expected rates based on the \\\"Rosc After Cardiac Arrest\\\" (RACA) score. Furthermore, a generalized linear mixed methods model was calculated to receive an adjusted effect for those devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feedback-devices were used in 17.5% of cases overall, rising from 7.1% (2015) to 23.2% (2022). Patients resuscitated with feedback devices had a 2.6% higher rate of hospital admission with spontaneous circulation (35.9% vs. 33.3%). In both groups, the ROSC rates were higher than predicted by the RACA score. After multivariable adjustment we found a minor effect for RTAVF use on any ROSC (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.14), but no effect on the ROSC rate on admission (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We could show a minor association between the use of feedback devices and any ROSC, but not for ROSC on hospital admission, in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a generalized linear mixed model. Further research should address implementation strategies, sustainability and evaluate its effectiveness for other applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110453\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110453","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:院外心脏骤停是欧洲死亡的主要原因。高质量的心肺复苏,特别是胸外按压,是至关重要的。实时视听反馈(RTAVF)设备旨在提高胸部按压质量。最近对这些工具的研究报告了院内但院外心脏骤停的改善结果。这项基于登记的回顾性研究调查了德国紧急医疗服务人员使用反馈装置治疗院外心脏骤停的情况,并评估了其对自发循环恢复(ROSC)的影响。方法:我们分析了2015年至2022年间德国复苏登记处的107,548条记录,并比较了使用反馈装置和不使用反馈装置的患者的患者结局。将任何时间和入院时的ROSC率与基于“心脏骤停后ROSC”(RACA)评分的预期率进行比较。此外,计算了广义线性混合方法模型,以获得这些器件的调整效果。结果:17.5%的病例使用了反馈装置,从2015年的7.1%上升到2022年的23.2%。使用反馈装置复苏的患者因自发循环住院率高出2.6%(35.9%比33.3%)。在两组中,ROSC率都高于RACA评分的预测。在多变量调整后,我们发现RTAVF的使用对任何ROSC都有轻微的影响(优势比1.09,95%可信区间1.04-1.14),但对入院时ROSC率没有影响(优势比0.98,95%可信区间0.93-1.03)。结论:我们可以在一个广义线性混合模型中显示,在院外心脏骤停患者中,反馈装置的使用与任何ROSC之间存在轻微的关联,但与入院时的ROSC无关。进一步的研究应涉及执行战略、可持续性和评价其在其他应用方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of CPR feedback devices to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany: Associated with improved ROSC-rates, but infrequent usage, in a registry-based analysis of 107,548 cases.

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in Europe. Quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation, particularly of chest compressions, is crucial. Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices aim to enhance chest compression quality. Recent studies on these tools have reported improved outcomes for in-hospital but not for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This registry-based, retrospective study investigated the use of feedback-devices by emergency medical services personnel to treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Germany and assessed its effect on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Methods: We analyzed 107,548 records from the German Resuscitation Registry between 2015 and 2022 and compared patient outcomes of patients treated with feedback devices or not. ROSC rates both at any time and at hospital admission were compared to expected rates based on the "Rosc After Cardiac Arrest" (RACA) score. Furthermore, a generalized linear mixed methods model was calculated to receive an adjusted effect for those devices.

Results: Feedback-devices were used in 17.5% of cases overall, rising from 7.1% (2015) to 23.2% (2022). Patients resuscitated with feedback devices had a 2.6% higher rate of hospital admission with spontaneous circulation (35.9% vs. 33.3%). In both groups, the ROSC rates were higher than predicted by the RACA score. After multivariable adjustment we found a minor effect for RTAVF use on any ROSC (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.14), but no effect on the ROSC rate on admission (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.03).

Conclusion: We could show a minor association between the use of feedback devices and any ROSC, but not for ROSC on hospital admission, in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a generalized linear mixed model. Further research should address implementation strategies, sustainability and evaluate its effectiveness for other applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Implications of an Individualized Resuscitation Strategy Using Continuous Rhythm and Physiologic Status Assessment During Ongoing CPR. Unraveling some of the myth about drowning, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and outcomes: Many critical factors and processes, most of them disappointingly difficult to manage. Who put the "E" in CPR: Equity before Extracorporeal? Using cardiac arrest registries for clinical trials by adding wagons to a rolling train. A retrospective 'target trial emulation' comparing amiodarone and lidocaine for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1