{"title":"住院患者疼痛评估的现状和挑战:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Xiaofeng Xu, Hongxiu Chen, Jing Xu, Yue'er Zhang, Renrong Gong, Xiuying Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate pain assessment still faces many challenges, which impact the effectiveness of analgesic interventions. Understanding the current status of pain assessment implementation and its inhibiting and facilitating factors might help facilitate accurate pain assessment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the nurses' current pain assessment practices for hospitalized patients and analyze the factors that facilitate or inhibit the standardization of pain assessment implementation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a cross-sectional survey that includes a questionnaire survey and an on-site observation. The questionnaire survey was conducted in 78 public hospitals in 18 districts or counties of Sichuan Province, China, with 1,050 clinical registered nurses surveyed. The on-site observation was conducted in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital, separate from the public hospitals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the questionnaire survey, a structured self-administered \"Pain Nursing Practice Questionnaire\" was used to assess nurses' pain practice behaviors in four aspects: pain assessment, recording, intervention, and education. Additionally, in third-party on-site observations, observers evaluated nurses' pain assessment practices in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results for the questionnaire survey showed that pain assessments were most frequently conducted once per day (53.4%), primarily triggered by patient reports of pain (93.0%) and following pain management interventions (93.0%). The Numerical Rating Scale was the most commonly used tool for patients who could report pain (86.7%), while the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators was most used for nonverbal patients (63.2%). Factors affecting accurate pain assessment included poor compliance with protocols (79.71%) and insufficient knowledge of pain assessment (65.43%). The average assessment time reported by nurses for speaking patients was 198 seconds. However, the average time nurses took to assess the pain of speaking patients was 98 seconds in on-site observations. The on-site observations showed an average assessment time of 124.9 seconds upon patient admission and 77.3 seconds for patients during hospitalization, with the difference being statistically significant (t = 2.123, p = .038). Additionally, 10.2% of nurses did not inquire about specific pain complaints, and 18.4% did not use pain assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals significant discrepancies in pain assessment practices among nurses. In the process of pain assessment practice, the assessment time is shorter, and the process is less standardized compared to self-reported results. The factors impeding standardized pain assessment included nurses' insufficient knowledge and poor protocol adherence. Therefore, enhanced training, more explicit guidelines, and robust institutional support are needed to standardize pain assessments and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Status and Challenges of Pain Assessment in Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofeng Xu, Hongxiu Chen, Jing Xu, Yue'er Zhang, Renrong Gong, Xiuying Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate pain assessment still faces many challenges, which impact the effectiveness of analgesic interventions. Understanding the current status of pain assessment implementation and its inhibiting and facilitating factors might help facilitate accurate pain assessment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the nurses' current pain assessment practices for hospitalized patients and analyze the factors that facilitate or inhibit the standardization of pain assessment implementation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a cross-sectional survey that includes a questionnaire survey and an on-site observation. The questionnaire survey was conducted in 78 public hospitals in 18 districts or counties of Sichuan Province, China, with 1,050 clinical registered nurses surveyed. The on-site observation was conducted in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital, separate from the public hospitals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the questionnaire survey, a structured self-administered \\\"Pain Nursing Practice Questionnaire\\\" was used to assess nurses' pain practice behaviors in four aspects: pain assessment, recording, intervention, and education. Additionally, in third-party on-site observations, observers evaluated nurses' pain assessment practices in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results for the questionnaire survey showed that pain assessments were most frequently conducted once per day (53.4%), primarily triggered by patient reports of pain (93.0%) and following pain management interventions (93.0%). The Numerical Rating Scale was the most commonly used tool for patients who could report pain (86.7%), while the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators was most used for nonverbal patients (63.2%). Factors affecting accurate pain assessment included poor compliance with protocols (79.71%) and insufficient knowledge of pain assessment (65.43%). The average assessment time reported by nurses for speaking patients was 198 seconds. However, the average time nurses took to assess the pain of speaking patients was 98 seconds in on-site observations. The on-site observations showed an average assessment time of 124.9 seconds upon patient admission and 77.3 seconds for patients during hospitalization, with the difference being statistically significant (t = 2.123, p = .038). Additionally, 10.2% of nurses did not inquire about specific pain complaints, and 18.4% did not use pain assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals significant discrepancies in pain assessment practices among nurses. In the process of pain assessment practice, the assessment time is shorter, and the process is less standardized compared to self-reported results. The factors impeding standardized pain assessment included nurses' insufficient knowledge and poor protocol adherence. Therefore, enhanced training, more explicit guidelines, and robust institutional support are needed to standardize pain assessments and improve patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:准确的疼痛评估仍然面临许多挑战,这影响了镇痛干预的有效性。了解疼痛评估实施的现状及其抑制和促进因素有助于准确评估疼痛。目的:了解护士对住院患者疼痛评估的现状,分析促进或抑制疼痛评估规范化实施的因素。设计:本研究为横断面调查,包括问卷调查和现场观察。问卷调查在四川省18个区县的78所公立医院进行,调查对象为1050名临床注册护士。现场观察是在一所大学附属三级医院进行的,与公立医院分开。方法:在问卷调查中,采用结构化自填的《疼痛护理实践问卷》,从疼痛评估、记录、干预、教育四个方面对护士的疼痛实践行为进行评估。此外,在第三方现场观察,观察员评估护士的疼痛评估实践在临床设置。结果:问卷调查结果显示,每天进行一次疼痛评估的频率最高(53.4%),主要由患者报告疼痛(93.0%)和随后的疼痛管理干预(93.0%)触发。对于能够报告疼痛的患者,最常用的工具是数字评定量表(86.7%),而非语言疼痛指标清单(63.2%)则是最常用的非语言疼痛指标清单(63.2%)。影响准确疼痛评估的因素包括方案依从性差(79.71%)和对疼痛评估知识不足(65.43%)。护士对会说话的病人的平均评估时间为198秒。然而,在现场观察中,护士评估说话患者疼痛的平均时间为98秒。现场观察患者入院时平均评估时间为124.9秒,住院期间平均评估时间为77.3秒,差异有统计学意义(t = 2.123, p = 0.038)。此外,10.2%的护士没有询问具体的疼痛投诉,18.4%的护士没有使用疼痛评估工具。结论:研究显示护士在疼痛评估实践方面存在显著差异。在疼痛评估实践过程中,与自我报告结果相比,评估时间更短,过程更不规范。阻碍标准化疼痛评估的因素包括护士知识不足和方案依从性差。因此,需要加强培训,更明确的指导方针和强有力的制度支持来规范疼痛评估和改善患者的预后。
The Status and Challenges of Pain Assessment in Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Background: Accurate pain assessment still faces many challenges, which impact the effectiveness of analgesic interventions. Understanding the current status of pain assessment implementation and its inhibiting and facilitating factors might help facilitate accurate pain assessment.
Purpose: To investigate the nurses' current pain assessment practices for hospitalized patients and analyze the factors that facilitate or inhibit the standardization of pain assessment implementation.
Design: This study is a cross-sectional survey that includes a questionnaire survey and an on-site observation. The questionnaire survey was conducted in 78 public hospitals in 18 districts or counties of Sichuan Province, China, with 1,050 clinical registered nurses surveyed. The on-site observation was conducted in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital, separate from the public hospitals.
Method: In the questionnaire survey, a structured self-administered "Pain Nursing Practice Questionnaire" was used to assess nurses' pain practice behaviors in four aspects: pain assessment, recording, intervention, and education. Additionally, in third-party on-site observations, observers evaluated nurses' pain assessment practices in clinical settings.
Results: Results for the questionnaire survey showed that pain assessments were most frequently conducted once per day (53.4%), primarily triggered by patient reports of pain (93.0%) and following pain management interventions (93.0%). The Numerical Rating Scale was the most commonly used tool for patients who could report pain (86.7%), while the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators was most used for nonverbal patients (63.2%). Factors affecting accurate pain assessment included poor compliance with protocols (79.71%) and insufficient knowledge of pain assessment (65.43%). The average assessment time reported by nurses for speaking patients was 198 seconds. However, the average time nurses took to assess the pain of speaking patients was 98 seconds in on-site observations. The on-site observations showed an average assessment time of 124.9 seconds upon patient admission and 77.3 seconds for patients during hospitalization, with the difference being statistically significant (t = 2.123, p = .038). Additionally, 10.2% of nurses did not inquire about specific pain complaints, and 18.4% did not use pain assessment tools.
Conclusions: The study reveals significant discrepancies in pain assessment practices among nurses. In the process of pain assessment practice, the assessment time is shorter, and the process is less standardized compared to self-reported results. The factors impeding standardized pain assessment included nurses' insufficient knowledge and poor protocol adherence. Therefore, enhanced training, more explicit guidelines, and robust institutional support are needed to standardize pain assessments and improve patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.