“我看到它的方式让我相信你是故意的”:暴力罪犯的故意归属和目光转换熵。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Biological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108962
Anna Zajenkowska, Marta Bodecka-Zych, Ewa Duda, Jean Gagnon, Krzysztof Krejtz
{"title":"“我看到它的方式让我相信你是故意的”:暴力罪犯的故意归属和目光转换熵。","authors":"Anna Zajenkowska, Marta Bodecka-Zych, Ewa Duda, Jean Gagnon, Krzysztof Krejtz","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive processes underlying inferences regarding inferring mental states (i.e. intentionality ascription) are still to be investigated. To assess how people accumulate social cues in order to attribute intentionality, a measure of gaze transition entropy (GTE) seems indicated to throw some light on these processes. Violent behavior is associated with distorted attributional processes but also with deficiencies in attention to socially relevant cues. Therefore, the current study compared the level of entropy between both violent male and female offenders and non-offenders and explore the association between GTE and ascribing intentionality. The sample (N = 128) consisted of violent inmates (N = 63, 31 women) and adults living in the community (N = 65, 31 women). Lower entropy characterized violent offenders to a greater extent as compared to those with no history of volent crimes. Moreover, lower entropy predicted greater intentionality ascription especially in judging ambiguous and hostile harmful events but only in the violent offender group. Findings imply that hostile attributions in violent offenders not only depend on a predisposition to interpret external reality in a hostile manner but can be the result of an inferential processing based on insufficient and incomplete information.</p>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"108962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"The way I see it makes me believe you intentionally did it\\\": Intentionality ascription and gaze transition entropy in violent offenders.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Zajenkowska, Marta Bodecka-Zych, Ewa Duda, Jean Gagnon, Krzysztof Krejtz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognitive processes underlying inferences regarding inferring mental states (i.e. intentionality ascription) are still to be investigated. To assess how people accumulate social cues in order to attribute intentionality, a measure of gaze transition entropy (GTE) seems indicated to throw some light on these processes. Violent behavior is associated with distorted attributional processes but also with deficiencies in attention to socially relevant cues. Therefore, the current study compared the level of entropy between both violent male and female offenders and non-offenders and explore the association between GTE and ascribing intentionality. The sample (N = 128) consisted of violent inmates (N = 63, 31 women) and adults living in the community (N = 65, 31 women). Lower entropy characterized violent offenders to a greater extent as compared to those with no history of volent crimes. Moreover, lower entropy predicted greater intentionality ascription especially in judging ambiguous and hostile harmful events but only in the violent offender group. Findings imply that hostile attributions in violent offenders not only depend on a predisposition to interpret external reality in a hostile manner but can be the result of an inferential processing based on insufficient and incomplete information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108962\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108962","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于推断心理状态(即意向性归因)的推理的认知过程仍有待研究。为了评估人们是如何积累社会线索以归因于意向性的,一种凝视转换熵(GTE)的测量似乎表明了对这些过程的一些启示。暴力行为与扭曲的归因过程有关,但也与缺乏对社会相关线索的注意有关。因此,本研究比较了施暴者与非施暴者的熵值水平,探讨了GTE与归因意向性之间的关系。样本(N= 128)由暴力囚犯(N= 63,31名女性)和社区成年人(N= 65,31名女性)组成。与没有暴力犯罪史的人相比,暴力犯罪者的熵值更低。此外,较低的熵预示着更大的意向性归属,特别是在判断模棱两可和敌对的有害事件时,但仅在暴力犯罪者组中。研究结果表明,暴力犯罪者的敌对归因不仅取决于以敌对方式解释外部现实的倾向,而且可能是基于不充分和不完整信息的推理处理的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"The way I see it makes me believe you intentionally did it": Intentionality ascription and gaze transition entropy in violent offenders.

Cognitive processes underlying inferences regarding inferring mental states (i.e. intentionality ascription) are still to be investigated. To assess how people accumulate social cues in order to attribute intentionality, a measure of gaze transition entropy (GTE) seems indicated to throw some light on these processes. Violent behavior is associated with distorted attributional processes but also with deficiencies in attention to socially relevant cues. Therefore, the current study compared the level of entropy between both violent male and female offenders and non-offenders and explore the association between GTE and ascribing intentionality. The sample (N = 128) consisted of violent inmates (N = 63, 31 women) and adults living in the community (N = 65, 31 women). Lower entropy characterized violent offenders to a greater extent as compared to those with no history of volent crimes. Moreover, lower entropy predicted greater intentionality ascription especially in judging ambiguous and hostile harmful events but only in the violent offender group. Findings imply that hostile attributions in violent offenders not only depend on a predisposition to interpret external reality in a hostile manner but can be the result of an inferential processing based on insufficient and incomplete information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
期刊最新文献
Physiological responses to aversive and non-aversive audiovisual, auditory, and visual stimuli. Using N2pc variability to probe functionality: Linear mixed modelling of trial EEG and behaviour. Beyond facilitating unisensory processing: Crossmodal associative memory training further modulates sensory integration. Under pressure in the Eriksen flanker task. Loneliness is associated with diminished heart rate variability reactivity to acute social stress in younger adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1