手术室中利器的处理:单一机构回顾。

Bryanna Vesely, Madeline Fram, Matthew King, Lindsay LeSavage, Dekarlos Dial, Ashleigh Medda
{"title":"手术室中利器的处理:单一机构回顾。","authors":"Bryanna Vesely, Madeline Fram, Matthew King, Lindsay LeSavage, Dekarlos Dial, Ashleigh Medda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Operating room (OR) personnel are at a high risk for sharp injuries, which can cause serious side effects. The goals of this study are to analyze OR nurses and surgical technologists' experiences and their current level of sharps education. An anonymous survey was sent to a single institution asking whether the participants have been stuck by a sharp, when they were stuck, and their perspective on sharp safety. Forty-two participants responded to the survey. The authors found 69% had sustained a sharp injury, 58.6% being stuck while handling sharps alone. The majority (90.5%) believed handing back sharps protected was the safest. Forty-five percent reported never attending continuing medication education (CME) regarding sharps. Only 59.4% of those who had CME found it helpful. This is the first study the authors know of that looked at OR personnel's perspectives on sharps handling and CME. The authors recommend re-evaluation of current CME. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(4):216-218, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"33 4","pages":"216-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handling of Sharps in the Operating Room: A Single Institution Review.\",\"authors\":\"Bryanna Vesely, Madeline Fram, Matthew King, Lindsay LeSavage, Dekarlos Dial, Ashleigh Medda\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Operating room (OR) personnel are at a high risk for sharp injuries, which can cause serious side effects. The goals of this study are to analyze OR nurses and surgical technologists' experiences and their current level of sharps education. An anonymous survey was sent to a single institution asking whether the participants have been stuck by a sharp, when they were stuck, and their perspective on sharp safety. Forty-two participants responded to the survey. The authors found 69% had sustained a sharp injury, 58.6% being stuck while handling sharps alone. The majority (90.5%) believed handing back sharps protected was the safest. Forty-five percent reported never attending continuing medication education (CME) regarding sharps. Only 59.4% of those who had CME found it helpful. This is the first study the authors know of that looked at OR personnel's perspectives on sharps handling and CME. The authors recommend re-evaluation of current CME. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(4):216-218, 2024).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"216-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术室(OR)人员有很大的风险受到尖锐的伤害,这可能会导致严重的副作用。本研究的目的是分析手术室护士和外科技术人员的经验和他们目前的锐化教育水平。一份匿名调查被发送到一个机构,询问参与者是否被尖锐物卡住,何时被卡住,以及他们对尖锐物安全的看法。42名参与者回应了这项调查。研究人员发现,69%的人受过尖锐的伤害,58.6%的人在单独处理尖锐物品时被卡住。大多数人(90.5%)认为交还有保护的利器是最安全的。45%的人报告从未参加过关于锐化的持续药物教育(CME)。只有59.4%的人认为CME有帮助。这是作者所知道的第一项研究,研究了手术室人员对利器处理和CME的看法。作者建议重新评估当前的CME。[j] .外科骨科进展,33(4):216-218,2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Handling of Sharps in the Operating Room: A Single Institution Review.

Operating room (OR) personnel are at a high risk for sharp injuries, which can cause serious side effects. The goals of this study are to analyze OR nurses and surgical technologists' experiences and their current level of sharps education. An anonymous survey was sent to a single institution asking whether the participants have been stuck by a sharp, when they were stuck, and their perspective on sharp safety. Forty-two participants responded to the survey. The authors found 69% had sustained a sharp injury, 58.6% being stuck while handling sharps alone. The majority (90.5%) believed handing back sharps protected was the safest. Forty-five percent reported never attending continuing medication education (CME) regarding sharps. Only 59.4% of those who had CME found it helpful. This is the first study the authors know of that looked at OR personnel's perspectives on sharps handling and CME. The authors recommend re-evaluation of current CME. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(4):216-218, 2024).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incidence of Urinary Retention Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent and Pediatric Scoliosis at a Single Academic Center: Is There a Role for Prophylactic Tamsulosin? Indirect Coronal Reduction Technique Using a Volar Locking Plate in Distal Radius Fractures: A Case Series. Major Metropolitan Area COVID-19 - Positive Patients Undergoing Emergency and Elective Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Case-matched Control Study. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Increased Body Mass Associated with Decreased Bracing Outcomes. Fluoroscopy and Radiographs for Detecting Retained Surgical Needles in the Hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1