肺移植延迟胸骨闭合的临床结果。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation proceedings Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.044
Arvind Bakthavatsalam , Billanna Hwang , Michael S. Mulligan
{"title":"肺移植延迟胸骨闭合的临床结果。","authors":"Arvind Bakthavatsalam ,&nbsp;Billanna Hwang ,&nbsp;Michael S. Mulligan","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lung transplantation (LTx) is a critical treatment for end-stage pulmonary diseases. Delayed sternal closure (DSC) has been noted in cardiac surgery for several decades and is a viable strategy for patients who are hemodynamically unstable, at high risk for postoperative bleeding, and/or require prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass. However, DSC use and its effects on LTx clinical outcomes are not well-defined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone LTx between January 1, 2010, and October 1, 2018, at the University of Washington. Patients under the age of 18, undergoing repeat LTx, other solid organ transplantation, and/or had prior major cardiothoracic surgery were excluded. Patients were classified into 2 categories: DSC and primary sternal closure (PSC) groups. We examined hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, duration on the ventilator, and overall survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 370 patients were identified, with 350 patients in the PSC group and 20 patients in the DSC group. The median hospital LOS, ICU LOS and duration on the ventilator in the DSC group were 23.0 ± 3.8, 16.0 ± 3.6, and 9.0 ± 3.5 compared with 15.0 ± 0.8, 5.0 ± 0.5, and 1.0 ± 0.3 in the PSC group, respectively (All <em>P</em> &lt; .01). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that, at 1, 3, and 5 years, the DSC group had a survival of 75.0%, 60.0%, and 55.0%, and the PSC group had a survival of 91.4%, 82.6% and 75.1% respectively (<em>P</em> = .019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DSC is not uncommon in LTx and patients who do require DSC had a longer duration on the ventilator, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. Additionally, the DSC group had a worse survival compared with the PSC group. DSC is unlikely to be the sole factor influencing worse survival, but may be a marker of underlying patient factors that negatively affect survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"56 10","pages":"Pages 2231-2236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes in Delayed Sternal Closure in Lung Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Arvind Bakthavatsalam ,&nbsp;Billanna Hwang ,&nbsp;Michael S. Mulligan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lung transplantation (LTx) is a critical treatment for end-stage pulmonary diseases. Delayed sternal closure (DSC) has been noted in cardiac surgery for several decades and is a viable strategy for patients who are hemodynamically unstable, at high risk for postoperative bleeding, and/or require prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass. However, DSC use and its effects on LTx clinical outcomes are not well-defined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone LTx between January 1, 2010, and October 1, 2018, at the University of Washington. Patients under the age of 18, undergoing repeat LTx, other solid organ transplantation, and/or had prior major cardiothoracic surgery were excluded. Patients were classified into 2 categories: DSC and primary sternal closure (PSC) groups. We examined hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, duration on the ventilator, and overall survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 370 patients were identified, with 350 patients in the PSC group and 20 patients in the DSC group. The median hospital LOS, ICU LOS and duration on the ventilator in the DSC group were 23.0 ± 3.8, 16.0 ± 3.6, and 9.0 ± 3.5 compared with 15.0 ± 0.8, 5.0 ± 0.5, and 1.0 ± 0.3 in the PSC group, respectively (All <em>P</em> &lt; .01). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that, at 1, 3, and 5 years, the DSC group had a survival of 75.0%, 60.0%, and 55.0%, and the PSC group had a survival of 91.4%, 82.6% and 75.1% respectively (<em>P</em> = .019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DSC is not uncommon in LTx and patients who do require DSC had a longer duration on the ventilator, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. Additionally, the DSC group had a worse survival compared with the PSC group. DSC is unlikely to be the sole factor influencing worse survival, but may be a marker of underlying patient factors that negatively affect survival.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"56 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2231-2236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524005803\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524005803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺移植(LTx)是终末期肺部疾病的重要治疗方法。延迟胸骨闭锁术(DSC)在心脏外科手术中已经被注意了几十年,对于血液动力学不稳定、术后出血高风险和/或需要长时间体外循环的患者来说,这是一种可行的策略。然而,DSC的使用及其对LTx临床结果的影响尚不明确。方法:对2010年1月1日至2018年10月1日在华盛顿大学接受LTx治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。年龄在18岁以下、正在接受重复LTx、其他实体器官移植和/或之前有过重大心胸手术的患者被排除在外。将患者分为DSC组和PSC组。我们检查了住院时间(LOS)、重症监护病房(ICU) LOS、呼吸机持续时间和总生存期。结果:共发现370例患者,其中PSC组350例,DSC组20例。DSC组住院LOS、ICU LOS和呼吸机使用时间中位数分别为23.0±3.8、16.0±3.6和9.0±3.5,PSC组为15.0±0.8、5.0±0.5和1.0±0.3 (P均< 0.01)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,在1、3和5年时,DSC组的生存率分别为75.0%、60.0%和55.0%,PSC组的生存率分别为91.4%、82.6%和75.1% (P = 0.019)。结论:DSC在LTx中并不罕见,需要DSC的患者在呼吸机、ICU LOS和医院LOS上的持续时间更长。此外,与PSC组相比,DSC组的生存率更差。DSC不太可能是影响生存差的唯一因素,但可能是潜在的患者因素对生存产生负面影响的一个标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Outcomes in Delayed Sternal Closure in Lung Transplantation

Introduction

Lung transplantation (LTx) is a critical treatment for end-stage pulmonary diseases. Delayed sternal closure (DSC) has been noted in cardiac surgery for several decades and is a viable strategy for patients who are hemodynamically unstable, at high risk for postoperative bleeding, and/or require prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass. However, DSC use and its effects on LTx clinical outcomes are not well-defined.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone LTx between January 1, 2010, and October 1, 2018, at the University of Washington. Patients under the age of 18, undergoing repeat LTx, other solid organ transplantation, and/or had prior major cardiothoracic surgery were excluded. Patients were classified into 2 categories: DSC and primary sternal closure (PSC) groups. We examined hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, duration on the ventilator, and overall survival.

Results

A total of 370 patients were identified, with 350 patients in the PSC group and 20 patients in the DSC group. The median hospital LOS, ICU LOS and duration on the ventilator in the DSC group were 23.0 ± 3.8, 16.0 ± 3.6, and 9.0 ± 3.5 compared with 15.0 ± 0.8, 5.0 ± 0.5, and 1.0 ± 0.3 in the PSC group, respectively (All P < .01). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that, at 1, 3, and 5 years, the DSC group had a survival of 75.0%, 60.0%, and 55.0%, and the PSC group had a survival of 91.4%, 82.6% and 75.1% respectively (P = .019).

Conclusion

DSC is not uncommon in LTx and patients who do require DSC had a longer duration on the ventilator, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. Additionally, the DSC group had a worse survival compared with the PSC group. DSC is unlikely to be the sole factor influencing worse survival, but may be a marker of underlying patient factors that negatively affect survival.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Author Index Liver Transplantation in the Philippines: Light at the End of the Tunnel Current Status and Development of Rat DCD Renal Transplantation Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1