Arvind Bakthavatsalam , Billanna Hwang , Michael S. Mulligan
{"title":"肺移植延迟胸骨闭合的临床结果。","authors":"Arvind Bakthavatsalam , Billanna Hwang , Michael S. Mulligan","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lung transplantation (LTx) is a critical treatment for end-stage pulmonary diseases. Delayed sternal closure (DSC) has been noted in cardiac surgery for several decades and is a viable strategy for patients who are hemodynamically unstable, at high risk for postoperative bleeding, and/or require prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass. However, DSC use and its effects on LTx clinical outcomes are not well-defined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone LTx between January 1, 2010, and October 1, 2018, at the University of Washington. Patients under the age of 18, undergoing repeat LTx, other solid organ transplantation, and/or had prior major cardiothoracic surgery were excluded. Patients were classified into 2 categories: DSC and primary sternal closure (PSC) groups. We examined hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, duration on the ventilator, and overall survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 370 patients were identified, with 350 patients in the PSC group and 20 patients in the DSC group. The median hospital LOS, ICU LOS and duration on the ventilator in the DSC group were 23.0 ± 3.8, 16.0 ± 3.6, and 9.0 ± 3.5 compared with 15.0 ± 0.8, 5.0 ± 0.5, and 1.0 ± 0.3 in the PSC group, respectively (All <em>P</em> < .01). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that, at 1, 3, and 5 years, the DSC group had a survival of 75.0%, 60.0%, and 55.0%, and the PSC group had a survival of 91.4%, 82.6% and 75.1% respectively (<em>P</em> = .019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DSC is not uncommon in LTx and patients who do require DSC had a longer duration on the ventilator, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. Additionally, the DSC group had a worse survival compared with the PSC group. DSC is unlikely to be the sole factor influencing worse survival, but may be a marker of underlying patient factors that negatively affect survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"56 10","pages":"Pages 2231-2236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes in Delayed Sternal Closure in Lung Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Arvind Bakthavatsalam , Billanna Hwang , Michael S. Mulligan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lung transplantation (LTx) is a critical treatment for end-stage pulmonary diseases. Delayed sternal closure (DSC) has been noted in cardiac surgery for several decades and is a viable strategy for patients who are hemodynamically unstable, at high risk for postoperative bleeding, and/or require prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass. However, DSC use and its effects on LTx clinical outcomes are not well-defined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone LTx between January 1, 2010, and October 1, 2018, at the University of Washington. Patients under the age of 18, undergoing repeat LTx, other solid organ transplantation, and/or had prior major cardiothoracic surgery were excluded. Patients were classified into 2 categories: DSC and primary sternal closure (PSC) groups. We examined hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, duration on the ventilator, and overall survival.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 370 patients were identified, with 350 patients in the PSC group and 20 patients in the DSC group. The median hospital LOS, ICU LOS and duration on the ventilator in the DSC group were 23.0 ± 3.8, 16.0 ± 3.6, and 9.0 ± 3.5 compared with 15.0 ± 0.8, 5.0 ± 0.5, and 1.0 ± 0.3 in the PSC group, respectively (All <em>P</em> < .01). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that, at 1, 3, and 5 years, the DSC group had a survival of 75.0%, 60.0%, and 55.0%, and the PSC group had a survival of 91.4%, 82.6% and 75.1% respectively (<em>P</em> = .019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DSC is not uncommon in LTx and patients who do require DSC had a longer duration on the ventilator, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. Additionally, the DSC group had a worse survival compared with the PSC group. DSC is unlikely to be the sole factor influencing worse survival, but may be a marker of underlying patient factors that negatively affect survival.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"56 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2231-2236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524005803\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524005803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Outcomes in Delayed Sternal Closure in Lung Transplantation
Introduction
Lung transplantation (LTx) is a critical treatment for end-stage pulmonary diseases. Delayed sternal closure (DSC) has been noted in cardiac surgery for several decades and is a viable strategy for patients who are hemodynamically unstable, at high risk for postoperative bleeding, and/or require prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass. However, DSC use and its effects on LTx clinical outcomes are not well-defined.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone LTx between January 1, 2010, and October 1, 2018, at the University of Washington. Patients under the age of 18, undergoing repeat LTx, other solid organ transplantation, and/or had prior major cardiothoracic surgery were excluded. Patients were classified into 2 categories: DSC and primary sternal closure (PSC) groups. We examined hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, duration on the ventilator, and overall survival.
Results
A total of 370 patients were identified, with 350 patients in the PSC group and 20 patients in the DSC group. The median hospital LOS, ICU LOS and duration on the ventilator in the DSC group were 23.0 ± 3.8, 16.0 ± 3.6, and 9.0 ± 3.5 compared with 15.0 ± 0.8, 5.0 ± 0.5, and 1.0 ± 0.3 in the PSC group, respectively (All P < .01). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that, at 1, 3, and 5 years, the DSC group had a survival of 75.0%, 60.0%, and 55.0%, and the PSC group had a survival of 91.4%, 82.6% and 75.1% respectively (P = .019).
Conclusion
DSC is not uncommon in LTx and patients who do require DSC had a longer duration on the ventilator, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. Additionally, the DSC group had a worse survival compared with the PSC group. DSC is unlikely to be the sole factor influencing worse survival, but may be a marker of underlying patient factors that negatively affect survival.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.