环境和空间对水系硅藻、昆虫和鱼类共现网络大小和分类相似性的影响

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Global Ecology and Biogeography Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1111/geb.13935
Joseph L. Mruzek, William R. Budnick, Chad A. Larson, Sophia I. Passy
{"title":"环境和空间对水系硅藻、昆虫和鱼类共现网络大小和分类相似性的影响","authors":"Joseph L. Mruzek,&nbsp;William R. Budnick,&nbsp;Chad A. Larson,&nbsp;Sophia I. Passy","doi":"10.1111/geb.13935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The influences of environmental and spatial processes on species composition have been at the center of metacommunity ecology. Conversely, the relative importance of these processes for species co-occurrences and taxonomic similarity has remained poorly understood. We hypothesised that at a subcontinental scale, shared environmental preference would be the major driver of co-occurrences across species groups. In contrast, co-occurrences due to shared dispersal history were more likely in dispersal-limited taxa. Finally, we tested whether taxa co-occurring due to similar responses to environmental and spatial processes were more taxonomically similar than expected by chance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>The conterminous United States.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>1993–2019.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Stream diatoms, insects and fish.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We generated co-occurrence networks and developed methodology to determine the proportions of nodes and edges explained by pure environment alone (after accounting for space), pure space alone (after accounting for the environment), pure environment and pure space together, and spatially structured environment. Taxonomic similarity of taxa co-occurring because of environmental and/or spatial controls or because of unmeasured processes was compared to that of a null model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pure environment alone, spatially structured environment, and pure environment and pure space together explained the greatest proportion of nodes and edges in the co-occurrence networks of diatom species and genera, and insect genera. Conversely, pure environment and pure space together best explained the nodes and edges in the co-occurrence network of fish species and genera. Co-occurring taxa were more closely related than the random expectation in all comparisons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The environment controlled co-occurrences in all groups, while the influence of space was the strongest in fish, the most dispersal-limited group in our study. All co-occurring taxa were more taxonomically related than expected by chance due to environmental or spatial overlap or unaccounted factors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental and Spatial Effects on Co-Occurrence Network Size and Taxonomic Similarity in Stream Diatoms, Insects and Fish\",\"authors\":\"Joseph L. Mruzek,&nbsp;William R. Budnick,&nbsp;Chad A. Larson,&nbsp;Sophia I. Passy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.13935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The influences of environmental and spatial processes on species composition have been at the center of metacommunity ecology. Conversely, the relative importance of these processes for species co-occurrences and taxonomic similarity has remained poorly understood. We hypothesised that at a subcontinental scale, shared environmental preference would be the major driver of co-occurrences across species groups. In contrast, co-occurrences due to shared dispersal history were more likely in dispersal-limited taxa. Finally, we tested whether taxa co-occurring due to similar responses to environmental and spatial processes were more taxonomically similar than expected by chance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>The conterminous United States.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>1993–2019.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stream diatoms, insects and fish.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We generated co-occurrence networks and developed methodology to determine the proportions of nodes and edges explained by pure environment alone (after accounting for space), pure space alone (after accounting for the environment), pure environment and pure space together, and spatially structured environment. Taxonomic similarity of taxa co-occurring because of environmental and/or spatial controls or because of unmeasured processes was compared to that of a null model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pure environment alone, spatially structured environment, and pure environment and pure space together explained the greatest proportion of nodes and edges in the co-occurrence networks of diatom species and genera, and insect genera. Conversely, pure environment and pure space together best explained the nodes and edges in the co-occurrence network of fish species and genera. Co-occurring taxa were more closely related than the random expectation in all comparisons.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The environment controlled co-occurrences in all groups, while the influence of space was the strongest in fish, the most dispersal-limited group in our study. All co-occurring taxa were more taxonomically related than expected by chance due to environmental or spatial overlap or unaccounted factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13935\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.13935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境和空间过程对物种组成的影响一直是元群落生态学研究的核心。相反,这些过程对物种共现和分类相似性的相对重要性仍然知之甚少。我们假设,在次大陆尺度上,共同的环境偏好将是跨物种群体共同发生的主要驱动力。相比之下,由于共同的分散历史而导致的共现现象更可能发生在分散有限的分类群中。最后,我们测试了由于对环境和空间过程的相似响应而共同发生的分类群在分类上是否比偶然预期的更相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental and Spatial Effects on Co-Occurrence Network Size and Taxonomic Similarity in Stream Diatoms, Insects and Fish

Aim

The influences of environmental and spatial processes on species composition have been at the center of metacommunity ecology. Conversely, the relative importance of these processes for species co-occurrences and taxonomic similarity has remained poorly understood. We hypothesised that at a subcontinental scale, shared environmental preference would be the major driver of co-occurrences across species groups. In contrast, co-occurrences due to shared dispersal history were more likely in dispersal-limited taxa. Finally, we tested whether taxa co-occurring due to similar responses to environmental and spatial processes were more taxonomically similar than expected by chance.

Location

The conterminous United States.

Time Period

1993–2019.

Major Taxa Studied

Stream diatoms, insects and fish.

Methods

We generated co-occurrence networks and developed methodology to determine the proportions of nodes and edges explained by pure environment alone (after accounting for space), pure space alone (after accounting for the environment), pure environment and pure space together, and spatially structured environment. Taxonomic similarity of taxa co-occurring because of environmental and/or spatial controls or because of unmeasured processes was compared to that of a null model.

Results

Pure environment alone, spatially structured environment, and pure environment and pure space together explained the greatest proportion of nodes and edges in the co-occurrence networks of diatom species and genera, and insect genera. Conversely, pure environment and pure space together best explained the nodes and edges in the co-occurrence network of fish species and genera. Co-occurring taxa were more closely related than the random expectation in all comparisons.

Main Conclusions

The environment controlled co-occurrences in all groups, while the influence of space was the strongest in fish, the most dispersal-limited group in our study. All co-occurring taxa were more taxonomically related than expected by chance due to environmental or spatial overlap or unaccounted factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
期刊最新文献
Completing the Speciation Cycle: Ecological Niches and Traits Predict Local Species Coexistence in Birds Across the Globe CoralBleachRisk—Global Projections of Coral Bleaching Risk in the 21st Century SNAPSHOT USA 2019–2023: The First Five Years of Data From a Coordinated Camera Trap Survey of the United States Spatial Scale and the Underestimation of Stream Fish Community Invadedness Marked Variability in Distance-Decay Patterns Suggests Contrasting Dispersal Ability in Abyssal Taxa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1