晚期胆道癌的一线全身治疗和排序选择:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。

IF 5.7 4区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Bioscience trends Pub Date : 2025-01-14 Epub Date: 2024-12-08 DOI:10.5582/bst.2024.01376
Ranning Xu, Jian Zhou, Jian Yang, Yanxi Yu, Hao Wang, Ziqi Zhang, Jian Yang, Guo Zhang, Rui Liao
{"title":"晚期胆道癌的一线全身治疗和排序选择:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Ranning Xu, Jian Zhou, Jian Yang, Yanxi Yu, Hao Wang, Ziqi Zhang, Jian Yang, Guo Zhang, Rui Liao","doi":"10.5582/bst.2024.01376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current state of systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has undergone significant changes. Currently, there are no clinical trials directly comparing various first-line systemic therapy regimens to each other, and these trials are unlikely to be conducted in the future. In this systematic review, after various abstracts and full-text articles published from the establishment of the database until October 2024 were searched, we included and analysed phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of different first-line systemic treatment regimens in advanced BTC. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines and a random effects model to pool the overall effects. Finally, seven low-risk-of-bias trials (with all of the trials representing first-line trials) were included. A total of 4033 patients were included in seven first-line trials. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), network meta-analysis revealed that durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) triple therapy, S-1 + GemCis triple therapy, and pembrolizumab + GemCis triple therapy were superior to GemCis. In terms of overall survival (OS), network meta-analysis revealed that durvalumab + GemCis triple therapy and pembrolizumab + GemCis triple therapy outperformed GemCis. According to the ranking of the P scores, durvalumab + GemCis triple therapy ranked first in PFS and second in OS. Therefore, the advantages of molecular immunotherapy have gradually become known, which suggests that future trials should focus on other potential combinations and molecular immunotargeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8957,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience trends","volume":" ","pages":"555-562"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-line systemic therapy and sequencing options in advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ranning Xu, Jian Zhou, Jian Yang, Yanxi Yu, Hao Wang, Ziqi Zhang, Jian Yang, Guo Zhang, Rui Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.5582/bst.2024.01376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current state of systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has undergone significant changes. Currently, there are no clinical trials directly comparing various first-line systemic therapy regimens to each other, and these trials are unlikely to be conducted in the future. In this systematic review, after various abstracts and full-text articles published from the establishment of the database until October 2024 were searched, we included and analysed phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of different first-line systemic treatment regimens in advanced BTC. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines and a random effects model to pool the overall effects. Finally, seven low-risk-of-bias trials (with all of the trials representing first-line trials) were included. A total of 4033 patients were included in seven first-line trials. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), network meta-analysis revealed that durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) triple therapy, S-1 + GemCis triple therapy, and pembrolizumab + GemCis triple therapy were superior to GemCis. In terms of overall survival (OS), network meta-analysis revealed that durvalumab + GemCis triple therapy and pembrolizumab + GemCis triple therapy outperformed GemCis. According to the ranking of the P scores, durvalumab + GemCis triple therapy ranked first in PFS and second in OS. Therefore, the advantages of molecular immunotherapy have gradually become known, which suggests that future trials should focus on other potential combinations and molecular immunotargeted therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscience trends\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"555-562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscience trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01376\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience trends","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

晚期胆道癌(BTC)的全身治疗现状发生了重大变化。目前,还没有直接比较各种一线全身治疗方案的临床试验,未来也不太可能进行这些试验。在本系统综述中,检索了从数据库建立到2024年10月发表的各种摘要和全文文章,我们纳入并分析了3期临床试验,以评估不同一线全身治疗方案对晚期BTC的疗效。我们使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)报告指南的首选报告项目和随机效应模型来汇总总体效应。最后,纳入了7项低风险偏倚试验(所有试验均代表一线试验)。7项一线试验共纳入4033名患者。在无进展生存期(PFS)方面,网络荟萃分析显示durvalumab +吉西他滨+顺铂(GemCis)三联疗法、S-1 + GemCis三联疗法和pembrolizumab + GemCis三联疗法优于GemCis。在总生存期(OS)方面,网络荟萃分析显示durvalumab + GemCis三联疗法和pembrolizumab + GemCis三联疗法优于GemCis。根据P评分排名,durvalumab + GemCis三联疗法PFS排名第一,OS排名第二。因此,分子免疫治疗的优势已逐渐被人们所认识,这表明未来的试验应侧重于其他潜在的组合和分子免疫靶向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First-line systemic therapy and sequencing options in advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The current state of systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has undergone significant changes. Currently, there are no clinical trials directly comparing various first-line systemic therapy regimens to each other, and these trials are unlikely to be conducted in the future. In this systematic review, after various abstracts and full-text articles published from the establishment of the database until October 2024 were searched, we included and analysed phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of different first-line systemic treatment regimens in advanced BTC. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines and a random effects model to pool the overall effects. Finally, seven low-risk-of-bias trials (with all of the trials representing first-line trials) were included. A total of 4033 patients were included in seven first-line trials. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), network meta-analysis revealed that durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) triple therapy, S-1 + GemCis triple therapy, and pembrolizumab + GemCis triple therapy were superior to GemCis. In terms of overall survival (OS), network meta-analysis revealed that durvalumab + GemCis triple therapy and pembrolizumab + GemCis triple therapy outperformed GemCis. According to the ranking of the P scores, durvalumab + GemCis triple therapy ranked first in PFS and second in OS. Therefore, the advantages of molecular immunotherapy have gradually become known, which suggests that future trials should focus on other potential combinations and molecular immunotargeted therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BioScience Trends (Print ISSN 1881-7815, Online ISSN 1881-7823) is an international peer-reviewed journal. BioScience Trends devotes to publishing the latest and most exciting advances in scientific research. Articles cover fields of life science such as biochemistry, molecular biology, clinical research, public health, medical care system, and social science in order to encourage cooperation and exchange among scientists and clinical researchers.
期刊最新文献
Combating syphilis resurgence: China's multifaceted approach. From light to insight: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for unravelling cognitive impairment during task performance. Growth and differentiation factor 15: An emerging therapeutic target for brain diseases. Intestinal microbiota distribution and changes in different stages of Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis, bioinformatics analysis and in vivo simulation. Multimodal optimal matching and augmentation method for small sample gesture recognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1