基于机器学习的肝内胆管癌预后预测及手术指导。

IF 5.7 4区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Bioscience trends Pub Date : 2025-01-14 Epub Date: 2024-12-08 DOI:10.5582/bst.2024.01312
Long Huang, Jianbo Li, Shuncang Zhu, Liang Wang, Ge Li, Junyong Pan, Chun Zhang, Jianlin Lai, Yifeng Tian, Shi Chen
{"title":"基于机器学习的肝内胆管癌预后预测及手术指导。","authors":"Long Huang, Jianbo Li, Shuncang Zhu, Liang Wang, Ge Li, Junyong Pan, Chun Zhang, Jianlin Lai, Yifeng Tian, Shi Chen","doi":"10.5582/bst.2024.01312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prognosis following radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is poor, and optimal follow-up strategies remain unclear, with ongoing debates regarding anatomic resection (AR) versus non-anatomic resection (NAR). This study included 680 patients from five hospitals, comparing a combination of eight feature screening methods and 11 machine learning algorithms to predict prognosis and construct integrated models. These models were assessed using nested cross-validation and various datasets, benchmarked against TNM stage and performance status. Evaluation metrics such as area under the curve (AUC) were applied. Prognostic models incorporating screened features showed superior performance compared to unselected models, with AR emerging as a key variable. Treatment recommendation models for surgical approaches, including DeepSurv, neural network multitask logistic regression (N-MTLR), and Kernel support vector machine (SVM), indicated that N-MTLR's recommendations were associated with survival benefits. Additionally, some patients identified as suitable for NAR were within groups previously considered for AR. In conclusion, three robust clinical models were developed to predict ICC prognosis and optimize surgical decisions, improving patient outcomes and supporting shared decision-making for patients and surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":8957,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience trends","volume":" ","pages":"545-554"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based prognostic prediction and surgical guidance for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Long Huang, Jianbo Li, Shuncang Zhu, Liang Wang, Ge Li, Junyong Pan, Chun Zhang, Jianlin Lai, Yifeng Tian, Shi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.5582/bst.2024.01312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prognosis following radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is poor, and optimal follow-up strategies remain unclear, with ongoing debates regarding anatomic resection (AR) versus non-anatomic resection (NAR). This study included 680 patients from five hospitals, comparing a combination of eight feature screening methods and 11 machine learning algorithms to predict prognosis and construct integrated models. These models were assessed using nested cross-validation and various datasets, benchmarked against TNM stage and performance status. Evaluation metrics such as area under the curve (AUC) were applied. Prognostic models incorporating screened features showed superior performance compared to unselected models, with AR emerging as a key variable. Treatment recommendation models for surgical approaches, including DeepSurv, neural network multitask logistic regression (N-MTLR), and Kernel support vector machine (SVM), indicated that N-MTLR's recommendations were associated with survival benefits. Additionally, some patients identified as suitable for NAR were within groups previously considered for AR. In conclusion, three robust clinical models were developed to predict ICC prognosis and optimize surgical decisions, improving patient outcomes and supporting shared decision-making for patients and surgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscience trends\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"545-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscience trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01312\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience trends","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肝内胆管癌(ICC)根治性手术后的预后很差,最佳随访策略仍不清楚,关于解剖切除(AR)与非解剖切除(NAR)的争论仍在继续。本研究纳入了来自5家医院的680例患者,比较了8种特征筛选方法和11种机器学习算法的组合预测预后并构建集成模型。这些模型使用嵌套交叉验证和各种数据集进行评估,以TNM阶段和性能状态为基准。采用曲线下面积(AUC)等评价指标。与未选择的模型相比,纳入筛选特征的预后模型表现出更好的性能,AR成为一个关键变量。包括DeepSurv、神经网络多任务逻辑回归(N-MTLR)和核支持向量机(SVM)在内的手术入路治疗推荐模型表明,N-MTLR的推荐与生存获益相关。此外,一些确定适合NAR的患者属于先前考虑的AR组。总之,开发了三个强大的临床模型来预测ICC预后并优化手术决策,改善患者预后并支持患者和外科医生的共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning-based prognostic prediction and surgical guidance for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

The prognosis following radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is poor, and optimal follow-up strategies remain unclear, with ongoing debates regarding anatomic resection (AR) versus non-anatomic resection (NAR). This study included 680 patients from five hospitals, comparing a combination of eight feature screening methods and 11 machine learning algorithms to predict prognosis and construct integrated models. These models were assessed using nested cross-validation and various datasets, benchmarked against TNM stage and performance status. Evaluation metrics such as area under the curve (AUC) were applied. Prognostic models incorporating screened features showed superior performance compared to unselected models, with AR emerging as a key variable. Treatment recommendation models for surgical approaches, including DeepSurv, neural network multitask logistic regression (N-MTLR), and Kernel support vector machine (SVM), indicated that N-MTLR's recommendations were associated with survival benefits. Additionally, some patients identified as suitable for NAR were within groups previously considered for AR. In conclusion, three robust clinical models were developed to predict ICC prognosis and optimize surgical decisions, improving patient outcomes and supporting shared decision-making for patients and surgeons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BioScience Trends (Print ISSN 1881-7815, Online ISSN 1881-7823) is an international peer-reviewed journal. BioScience Trends devotes to publishing the latest and most exciting advances in scientific research. Articles cover fields of life science such as biochemistry, molecular biology, clinical research, public health, medical care system, and social science in order to encourage cooperation and exchange among scientists and clinical researchers.
期刊最新文献
Serum proteomics reveals early biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: The dual role of APOE-ε4. Development and validation of a machine-learning model to predict lymph node metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study. Repeat laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter, propensity score matching analysis. The APP Score: A simple serum biomarker model to enhance prognostic prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma. First-line systemic therapy and sequencing options in advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1