预防治疗对生活质量、日常功能和偏头痛的影响:来自三个双盲、随机、3期试验的结果。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1177/03331024241300305
Christopher Gottschalk, Pranav Gandhi, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Suzanne Christie, Cristina Tassorelli, Jonathan Stokes, Yingyi Liu, Lei Luo, Krisztian Nagy, Joel M Trugman, Richard B Lipton
{"title":"预防治疗对生活质量、日常功能和偏头痛的影响:来自三个双盲、随机、3期试验的结果。","authors":"Christopher Gottschalk, Pranav Gandhi, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Suzanne Christie, Cristina Tassorelli, Jonathan Stokes, Yingyi Liu, Lei Luo, Krisztian Nagy, Joel M Trugman, Richard B Lipton","doi":"10.1177/03331024241300305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to assess the effects of preventive migraine treatment with atogepant vs. placebo on patient-reported quality of life and functioning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses of patient-reported outcomes from three 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating preventive migraine treatment with atogepant 60 mg once-daily: ADVANCE (low-frequency episodic migraine [LFEM], 4-8 monthly migraine days [MMDs] and high-frequency episodic migraine [HFEM], 8-14 MMDs), PROGRESS (chronic migraine, CM) and ELEVATE (episodic migraine in those previously failed by two to four classes of oral preventive treatments).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Least squares mean differences (95% confidence interval (CI)) in change from baseline were greater (<i>p </i>< 0.05) for atogepant vs. placebo for Migraine-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain scores at week 12 (ADVANCE: LFEM 12.0 (95% CI = 6.0-18.0), HFEM 9.9 (95% CI = 3.4-16.4); PROGRESS: 6.2 (95% CI = 2.5-9.8); ELEVATE: 17.7 (95% CI = 13.1-22.3)), for Headache Impact Test-6 total scores at week 12 (ADVANCE: LFEM -4.7 (95% CI = -6.7 to -2.7); HFEM -3.4 (95% CI = -5.5 to -1.2); PROGRESS: -2.8 (95% CI = -4.1 to -1.4); ELEVATE: -6.5 (95% CI = -8.3 to -4.7)) and for Activity Impairment in Migraine-Diary-Performance of Daily Activities scores across 12 weeks (ADVANCE: LFEM -2.3 (95% CI = -3.9 to -0.7), HFEM -4.5 (95% CI = -6.9 to -2.2); PROGRESS: -3.4 (95% CI = -5.3 to -1.5); ELEVATE: -4.7 (95% CI = -6.4 to -3.1)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preventive migraine treatment with atogepant 60 mg once-daily vs. placebo improved measures of migraine-related quality of life and functioning among participants with different headache frequencies and histories of previous treatment failure.<b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03777059 (ADVANCE); NCT03855137 (PROGRESS); NCT04740827 (ELEVATE).</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"44 12","pages":"3331024241300305"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of preventive treatment with atogepant on quality of life, daily functioning, and headache impact across the spectrum of migraine: Findings from three double-blind, randomized, phase 3 trials.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Gottschalk, Pranav Gandhi, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Suzanne Christie, Cristina Tassorelli, Jonathan Stokes, Yingyi Liu, Lei Luo, Krisztian Nagy, Joel M Trugman, Richard B Lipton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024241300305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to assess the effects of preventive migraine treatment with atogepant vs. placebo on patient-reported quality of life and functioning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses of patient-reported outcomes from three 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating preventive migraine treatment with atogepant 60 mg once-daily: ADVANCE (low-frequency episodic migraine [LFEM], 4-8 monthly migraine days [MMDs] and high-frequency episodic migraine [HFEM], 8-14 MMDs), PROGRESS (chronic migraine, CM) and ELEVATE (episodic migraine in those previously failed by two to four classes of oral preventive treatments).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Least squares mean differences (95% confidence interval (CI)) in change from baseline were greater (<i>p </i>< 0.05) for atogepant vs. placebo for Migraine-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain scores at week 12 (ADVANCE: LFEM 12.0 (95% CI = 6.0-18.0), HFEM 9.9 (95% CI = 3.4-16.4); PROGRESS: 6.2 (95% CI = 2.5-9.8); ELEVATE: 17.7 (95% CI = 13.1-22.3)), for Headache Impact Test-6 total scores at week 12 (ADVANCE: LFEM -4.7 (95% CI = -6.7 to -2.7); HFEM -3.4 (95% CI = -5.5 to -1.2); PROGRESS: -2.8 (95% CI = -4.1 to -1.4); ELEVATE: -6.5 (95% CI = -8.3 to -4.7)) and for Activity Impairment in Migraine-Diary-Performance of Daily Activities scores across 12 weeks (ADVANCE: LFEM -2.3 (95% CI = -3.9 to -0.7), HFEM -4.5 (95% CI = -6.9 to -2.2); PROGRESS: -3.4 (95% CI = -5.3 to -1.5); ELEVATE: -4.7 (95% CI = -6.4 to -3.1)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preventive migraine treatment with atogepant 60 mg once-daily vs. placebo improved measures of migraine-related quality of life and functioning among participants with different headache frequencies and histories of previous treatment failure.<b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03777059 (ADVANCE); NCT03855137 (PROGRESS); NCT04740827 (ELEVATE).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"volume\":\"44 12\",\"pages\":\"3331024241300305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024241300305\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024241300305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们的目的是评估抗偏头痛治疗与安慰剂对患者报告的生活质量和功能的影响。方法:分析患者报告的三个12周、随机、安慰剂对照试验的结果,这些试验评估了使用atgeatement 60mg每日一次的预防性偏头痛治疗:ADVANCE(低频发作性偏头痛[LFEM],每月偏头痛4-8天[MMDs]和高频发作性偏头痛[HFEM], 8-14 MMDs)、PROGRESS(慢性偏头痛,CM)和ELEVATE(先前口服预防治疗失败的患者的发作性偏头痛)。结果:与基线相比,最小二乘平均差异(95%置信区间(CI))更大(p)。结论:在不同头痛频率和既往治疗失败史的参与者中,与安慰剂相比,使用atgeatine 60mg每日一次的预防性偏头痛治疗改善了偏头痛相关生活质量和功能的测量。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03777059 (ADVANCE);NCT03855137(进步);NCT04740827(提升)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of preventive treatment with atogepant on quality of life, daily functioning, and headache impact across the spectrum of migraine: Findings from three double-blind, randomized, phase 3 trials.

Background: We aimed to assess the effects of preventive migraine treatment with atogepant vs. placebo on patient-reported quality of life and functioning.

Methods: Analyses of patient-reported outcomes from three 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating preventive migraine treatment with atogepant 60 mg once-daily: ADVANCE (low-frequency episodic migraine [LFEM], 4-8 monthly migraine days [MMDs] and high-frequency episodic migraine [HFEM], 8-14 MMDs), PROGRESS (chronic migraine, CM) and ELEVATE (episodic migraine in those previously failed by two to four classes of oral preventive treatments).

Results: Least squares mean differences (95% confidence interval (CI)) in change from baseline were greater (p < 0.05) for atogepant vs. placebo for Migraine-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain scores at week 12 (ADVANCE: LFEM 12.0 (95% CI = 6.0-18.0), HFEM 9.9 (95% CI = 3.4-16.4); PROGRESS: 6.2 (95% CI = 2.5-9.8); ELEVATE: 17.7 (95% CI = 13.1-22.3)), for Headache Impact Test-6 total scores at week 12 (ADVANCE: LFEM -4.7 (95% CI = -6.7 to -2.7); HFEM -3.4 (95% CI = -5.5 to -1.2); PROGRESS: -2.8 (95% CI = -4.1 to -1.4); ELEVATE: -6.5 (95% CI = -8.3 to -4.7)) and for Activity Impairment in Migraine-Diary-Performance of Daily Activities scores across 12 weeks (ADVANCE: LFEM -2.3 (95% CI = -3.9 to -0.7), HFEM -4.5 (95% CI = -6.9 to -2.2); PROGRESS: -3.4 (95% CI = -5.3 to -1.5); ELEVATE: -4.7 (95% CI = -6.4 to -3.1)).

Conclusions: Preventive migraine treatment with atogepant 60 mg once-daily vs. placebo improved measures of migraine-related quality of life and functioning among participants with different headache frequencies and histories of previous treatment failure.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03777059 (ADVANCE); NCT03855137 (PROGRESS); NCT04740827 (ELEVATE).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
期刊最新文献
Building community and visibility: A year of social media growth for Cephalalgia. Defining the typical characteristics of orthostatic headache in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Exploring the association between familial hemiplegic migraine genes (CACNA1A, ATP1A2 and SCN1A) with migraine and epilepsy: A UK Biobank exome-wide association study. Sex differences in photophobic behaviors following cortical spreading depression in rats. A reply, drug-induced reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: Lessons from the real world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1