Durvalumab联合顺铂和吉西他滨治疗晚期胆道癌的生存结果:来自意大利一家机构的真实世界结果

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1159/000541891
Margherita Rimini, Silvia Foti, Silvia Camera, Federico Rossari, Francesco Vitiello, Federica Lo Prinzi, Luca Aldrighetti, Francesco De Cobelli, Federica Pedica, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Mara Persano, Stefano Cascinu, Andrea Casadei-Gardini
{"title":"Durvalumab联合顺铂和吉西他滨治疗晚期胆道癌的生存结果:来自意大利一家机构的真实世界结果","authors":"Margherita Rimini, Silvia Foti, Silvia Camera, Federico Rossari, Francesco Vitiello, Federica Lo Prinzi, Luca Aldrighetti, Francesco De Cobelli, Federica Pedica, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Mara Persano, Stefano Cascinu, Andrea Casadei-Gardini","doi":"10.1159/000541891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine, plus durvalumab. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Median OS was NR and median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.6 months, after a median follow-up of 13.5 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 34.5%, with stable disease in 53.0% of patients. High baseline CEA levels were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 16% (grade >2: 6%). Presence of TP53 mutation was related to a worse OS; conversely the presence of ARID1A genomic alteration was related to a better PFS. A tendence toward a better OS was found for BRCAness patients which did not reach the statistical significance. On the other hand, BRCAness patients showed significantly higher PFS compared to no BRCAness patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival Outcomes of Durvalumab in Combination with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Real-World Results from a Single Italian Institution.\",\"authors\":\"Margherita Rimini, Silvia Foti, Silvia Camera, Federico Rossari, Francesco Vitiello, Federica Lo Prinzi, Luca Aldrighetti, Francesco De Cobelli, Federica Pedica, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Mara Persano, Stefano Cascinu, Andrea Casadei-Gardini\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine, plus durvalumab. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Median OS was NR and median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.6 months, after a median follow-up of 13.5 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 34.5%, with stable disease in 53.0% of patients. High baseline CEA levels were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 16% (grade >2: 6%). Presence of TP53 mutation was related to a worse OS; conversely the presence of ARID1A genomic alteration was related to a better PFS. A tendence toward a better OS was found for BRCAness patients which did not reach the statistical significance. On the other hand, BRCAness patients showed significantly higher PFS compared to no BRCAness patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541891\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

TOPAZ-1 III期试验显示durvalumab联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆道癌(BTC)患者的生存获益。为了了解这种组合的实际疗效和耐受性,我们对其一线治疗结果进行了回顾性分析。方法:我们纳入了使用顺铂、吉西他滨和杜伐单抗治疗的不可切除、局部晚期或转移性BTC患者。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。结果:33例患者入组。中位OS为NR,中位PFS为7.6个月,中位随访时间为13.5个月。研究者评估的总有效率为34.5%,53.0%的患者病情稳定。高基线CEA水平与低生存率相关。97%的患者发生了任何级别的不良事件(ae)。免疫相关ae (irAEs)发生率为16% (bbb2.0: 6%)。存在TP53突变与较差的OS相关,相反,存在ARID1A基因组改变与较好的PFS相关。BRCAness患者有改善OS的趋势,但无统计学意义。结论:这项现实世界的分析在很大程度上证实了TOPAZ-1的研究结果,支持吉西他滨、顺铂和杜伐单抗作为晚期BTC患者的一线治疗标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survival Outcomes of Durvalumab in Combination with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Real-World Results from a Single Italian Institution.

Introduction: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial showed a survival benefit with durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). To understand this combination's real-world efficacy and tolerability, we conducted a retrospective analysis of its first-line treatment outcomes.

Methods: We included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine, plus durvalumab. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Median OS was NR and median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.6 months, after a median follow-up of 13.5 months. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 34.5%, with stable disease in 53.0% of patients. High baseline CEA levels were associated with poor survival. Any grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) occurred in 16% (grade >2: 6%). Presence of TP53 mutation was related to a worse OS; conversely the presence of ARID1A genomic alteration was related to a better PFS. A tendence toward a better OS was found for BRCAness patients which did not reach the statistical significance. On the other hand, BRCAness patients showed significantly higher PFS compared to no BRCAness patients.

Conclusion: This real-world analysis largely confirmed the TOPAZ-1 findings, supporting gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab as a first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
期刊最新文献
High expression of tetraspanin CD63 predicts poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Analysis of Pleiotropic Effects of Nivolumab in Patients with Relapsed Pleural Mesothelioma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Constructing and Validating Models for Predicting Gleason Grade Group Upgrading Following Radical Prostatectomy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms and Conventional Logistic Regression. Post-Marketing Safety of Temozolomide: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Health-Related Quality of Life in a Real-World Cohort of Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1