靶向治疗时代慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤Richter转化的发生率

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Leukemia Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1038/s41375-024-02492-4
Paul J. Hampel, Kari G. Rabe, Yucai Wang, Steven R. Hwang, Saad S. Kenderian, Eli Muchtar, Jose F. Leis, Amber B. Koehler, Mazie Tsang, Talal Hilal, Ricardo Parrondo, Rachel J. Bailen, Susan M. Schwager, Curtis A. Hanson, Esteban Braggio, Susan L. Slager, Min Shi, Cinthya J. Zepeda-Mendoza, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Tait D. Shanafelt, Rebecca L. King, Timothy G. Call, Neil E. Kay, Wei Ding, Sameer A. Parikh
{"title":"靶向治疗时代慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤Richter转化的发生率","authors":"Paul J. Hampel, Kari G. Rabe, Yucai Wang, Steven R. Hwang, Saad S. Kenderian, Eli Muchtar, Jose F. Leis, Amber B. Koehler, Mazie Tsang, Talal Hilal, Ricardo Parrondo, Rachel J. Bailen, Susan M. Schwager, Curtis A. Hanson, Esteban Braggio, Susan L. Slager, Min Shi, Cinthya J. Zepeda-Mendoza, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Tait D. Shanafelt, Rebecca L. King, Timothy G. Call, Neil E. Kay, Wei Ding, Sameer A. Parikh","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02492-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Richter transformation (RT) is the histologic transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) into an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). RT has devastating consequences with survival after transformation typically &lt;1 year [1]. Estimates of RT frequency vary by study design, setting, and duration of follow-up. In several large studies from time periods when chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) was used to treat patients with CLL, RT rates have been reported between 2 and 10% after a median follow-up of 4–6 years from the time of diagnosis; these studies included patients with both newly diagnosed CLL and treated CLL [2,3,4,5,6]. Targeted therapies, including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors (BCL2i), are now standard of care treatment for patients with CLL. High RT rates (up to 25%) reported in early studies with BTKi and BCL2i in relapsed CLL patients likely reflect increased RT risk among heavily pre-treated patients rather than risk due to these therapies themselves [7, 8]. Comparison of risk after specific treatment exposures from first-line clinical trials with CIT and targeted therapy arms is limited by the low numbers of RT events reported [9,10,11,12,13]. As the treatment paradigm for CLL has changed and CLL patients are living longer, we aimed to assess the current risk of developing RT and the potential impact of targeted therapies on that risk by comparing cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed CLL across different time periods.</p><p>Following IRB approval, we identified patients with previously untreated CLL in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database who were seen within 12 months of diagnosis. Only cases of biopsy proven DLBCL with histopathologic confirmation at Mayo Clinic were considered an RT event. Cumulative incidence methodology was used to display the time to development of RT, both from time of initial CLL diagnosis and from start of CLL-directed therapy, with death as a competing risk. We defined the period prior to February 2014 (FDA approval of ibrutinib for CLL) as the pre-targeted therapy era and the period after February 2014 as the targeted therapy era. Using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we compared the incidence of RT between patients diagnosed with CLL in the pre-targeted therapy era versus the targeted therapy era. Cox regression analysis was also used to investigate the association of effects of type of treatment exposure (time-dependent variable) on risk of RT. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).</p>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Richter transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in the targeted therapy era\",\"authors\":\"Paul J. Hampel, Kari G. Rabe, Yucai Wang, Steven R. Hwang, Saad S. Kenderian, Eli Muchtar, Jose F. Leis, Amber B. Koehler, Mazie Tsang, Talal Hilal, Ricardo Parrondo, Rachel J. Bailen, Susan M. Schwager, Curtis A. Hanson, Esteban Braggio, Susan L. Slager, Min Shi, Cinthya J. Zepeda-Mendoza, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Tait D. Shanafelt, Rebecca L. King, Timothy G. Call, Neil E. Kay, Wei Ding, Sameer A. Parikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41375-024-02492-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Richter transformation (RT) is the histologic transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) into an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). RT has devastating consequences with survival after transformation typically &lt;1 year [1]. Estimates of RT frequency vary by study design, setting, and duration of follow-up. In several large studies from time periods when chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) was used to treat patients with CLL, RT rates have been reported between 2 and 10% after a median follow-up of 4–6 years from the time of diagnosis; these studies included patients with both newly diagnosed CLL and treated CLL [2,3,4,5,6]. Targeted therapies, including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors (BCL2i), are now standard of care treatment for patients with CLL. High RT rates (up to 25%) reported in early studies with BTKi and BCL2i in relapsed CLL patients likely reflect increased RT risk among heavily pre-treated patients rather than risk due to these therapies themselves [7, 8]. Comparison of risk after specific treatment exposures from first-line clinical trials with CIT and targeted therapy arms is limited by the low numbers of RT events reported [9,10,11,12,13]. As the treatment paradigm for CLL has changed and CLL patients are living longer, we aimed to assess the current risk of developing RT and the potential impact of targeted therapies on that risk by comparing cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed CLL across different time periods.</p><p>Following IRB approval, we identified patients with previously untreated CLL in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database who were seen within 12 months of diagnosis. Only cases of biopsy proven DLBCL with histopathologic confirmation at Mayo Clinic were considered an RT event. Cumulative incidence methodology was used to display the time to development of RT, both from time of initial CLL diagnosis and from start of CLL-directed therapy, with death as a competing risk. We defined the period prior to February 2014 (FDA approval of ibrutinib for CLL) as the pre-targeted therapy era and the period after February 2014 as the targeted therapy era. Using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we compared the incidence of RT between patients diagnosed with CLL in the pre-targeted therapy era versus the targeted therapy era. Cox regression analysis was also used to investigate the association of effects of type of treatment exposure (time-dependent variable) on risk of RT. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02492-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02492-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Richter转化(RT)是慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(CLL)向侵袭性淋巴瘤的组织学转化,最常见的是弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)。RT对转化后的生存具有毁灭性的影响,通常为1年。RT频率的估计因研究设计、环境和随访时间而异。在使用化学免疫疗法(CIT)治疗CLL患者的几项大型研究中,在诊断后4-6年的中位随访后,RT率报道在2%至10%之间;这些研究既包括新诊断的CLL患者,也包括已治疗的CLL患者[2,3,4,5,6]。靶向治疗,包括布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)和b细胞淋巴瘤2抑制剂(BCL2i),现在是CLL患者的标准护理治疗。BTKi和BCL2i在复发CLL患者中的早期研究中报道的高RT率(高达25%)可能反映了大量预处理患者RT风险的增加,而不是由于这些治疗本身的风险[7,8]。CIT和靶向治疗组一线临床试验特异性治疗暴露后的风险比较受到报道的低RT事件数量的限制[9,10,11,12,13]。由于CLL的治疗模式发生了变化,CLL患者的寿命更长,我们旨在通过比较不同时期新诊断的CLL患者队列,评估目前发展为RT的风险以及靶向治疗对该风险的潜在影响。在IRB批准后,我们在梅奥诊所CLL数据库中发现了诊断后12个月内未治疗的CLL患者。只有在梅奥诊所活检证实DLBCL并经组织病理学证实的病例才被认为是RT事件。累积发病率方法学用于显示从初始CLL诊断时间和从CLL定向治疗开始到RT发展的时间,死亡是一个竞争风险。我们将2014年2月(FDA批准ibrutinib治疗CLL)之前的时期定义为预靶向治疗时代,2014年2月之后的时期定义为靶向治疗时代。使用Cox比例风险回归分析,我们比较了靶向治疗前和靶向治疗时期诊断为CLL患者的RT发生率。还采用Cox回归分析来调查治疗暴露类型(时间相关变量)对rt风险的影响。使用SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA)进行统计分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence of Richter transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in the targeted therapy era

Richter transformation (RT) is the histologic transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) into an aggressive lymphoma, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). RT has devastating consequences with survival after transformation typically <1 year [1]. Estimates of RT frequency vary by study design, setting, and duration of follow-up. In several large studies from time periods when chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) was used to treat patients with CLL, RT rates have been reported between 2 and 10% after a median follow-up of 4–6 years from the time of diagnosis; these studies included patients with both newly diagnosed CLL and treated CLL [2,3,4,5,6]. Targeted therapies, including Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors (BCL2i), are now standard of care treatment for patients with CLL. High RT rates (up to 25%) reported in early studies with BTKi and BCL2i in relapsed CLL patients likely reflect increased RT risk among heavily pre-treated patients rather than risk due to these therapies themselves [7, 8]. Comparison of risk after specific treatment exposures from first-line clinical trials with CIT and targeted therapy arms is limited by the low numbers of RT events reported [9,10,11,12,13]. As the treatment paradigm for CLL has changed and CLL patients are living longer, we aimed to assess the current risk of developing RT and the potential impact of targeted therapies on that risk by comparing cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed CLL across different time periods.

Following IRB approval, we identified patients with previously untreated CLL in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database who were seen within 12 months of diagnosis. Only cases of biopsy proven DLBCL with histopathologic confirmation at Mayo Clinic were considered an RT event. Cumulative incidence methodology was used to display the time to development of RT, both from time of initial CLL diagnosis and from start of CLL-directed therapy, with death as a competing risk. We defined the period prior to February 2014 (FDA approval of ibrutinib for CLL) as the pre-targeted therapy era and the period after February 2014 as the targeted therapy era. Using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we compared the incidence of RT between patients diagnosed with CLL in the pre-targeted therapy era versus the targeted therapy era. Cox regression analysis was also used to investigate the association of effects of type of treatment exposure (time-dependent variable) on risk of RT. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia
Leukemia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
3.50%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Title: Leukemia Journal Overview: Publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research Covers all aspects of research and treatment of leukemia and allied diseases Includes studies of normal hemopoiesis due to comparative relevance Topics of Interest: Oncogenes Growth factors Stem cells Leukemia genomics Cell cycle Signal transduction Molecular targets for therapy And more Content Types: Original research articles Reviews Letters Correspondence Comments elaborating on significant advances and covering topical issues
期刊最新文献
Targeting ABCD1-ACOX1-MET/IGF1R axis suppresses multiple myeloma Probability of remission with reinduction with 7+3 versus high-dose cytarabine: analysis of SWOG trial S1203 Effective eradication of acute myeloid leukemia stem cells with FLT3-directed antibody-drug conjugates International myeloma working group immunotherapy committee recommendation on sequencing immunotherapy for treatment of multiple myeloma Maternal weight during pregnancy and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in offspring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1