影响多发伤脊柱损伤手术治疗效果的因素分析。

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002704
Xiangyao Sun, Jiang Huang, Weiliang Wang, Limeng Gan, Li Cao, Yuqi Liu, Siyuan Sun, Juyong Wang, Shibao Lu
{"title":"影响多发伤脊柱损伤手术治疗效果的因素分析。","authors":"Xiangyao Sun, Jiang Huang, Weiliang Wang, Limeng Gan, Li Cao, Yuqi Liu, Siyuan Sun, Juyong Wang, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyze the diagnosis and treatment conditions of polytrauma patients with spinal injuries, to clarify the site of the first surgical intervention, the timing of the surgery, and factors influencing prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study collected and analyzed data on polytrauma patients with spinal injuries who were treated from January 2017 to January 2023. Data collected primarily included basic patient information, treatment strategy-related information, clinical scoring systems, imaging parameters, and prognosis. The impacts of relevant variables on postoperative survival outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 60 patients. There was no significant change in the number of patients rated ASIA grade E after 90 days of admission, while there was a significant increase in those rated grade D (<i>P</i><0.001). Among the groups, patients operated on within less than 12 h had the highest number of ASIA grade A, while those operated on after more than 48 h had the highest number of ASIA grade E (<i>P</i>=0.003). The survival rate of patients who underwent their first spinal surgery between 12 and 48 h was significantly better than those operated earlier than 12 h or later than 48 h (<i>P</i>=0.047). Patients who experienced hemorrhagic shock postsurgery had the lowest survival rate (<i>P</i><0.001). Only age (<i>P</i>=0.004) and the number of surgeries outside the spine (<i>P</i>=0.033), as covariates, were significantly correlated with patient mortality (R<sup>2</sup>=0.519).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing spinal surgery too early or too late can adversely affect patient outcomes; the appropriate timing of surgery should be chosen based on the specific characteristics of the patient. In polytrauma patients under emergency conditions, the use of combined surgical treatments should be minimized to prevent the occurrence of a 'second hit'. Patients who experience hemorrhagic shock have the worst postsurgical survival; targeted treatment should be administered upon hospital admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"86 12","pages":"6960-6967"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of factors influencing the surgical treatment outcomes of spinal injuries in polytrauma patients.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangyao Sun, Jiang Huang, Weiliang Wang, Limeng Gan, Li Cao, Yuqi Liu, Siyuan Sun, Juyong Wang, Shibao Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyze the diagnosis and treatment conditions of polytrauma patients with spinal injuries, to clarify the site of the first surgical intervention, the timing of the surgery, and factors influencing prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study collected and analyzed data on polytrauma patients with spinal injuries who were treated from January 2017 to January 2023. Data collected primarily included basic patient information, treatment strategy-related information, clinical scoring systems, imaging parameters, and prognosis. The impacts of relevant variables on postoperative survival outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 60 patients. There was no significant change in the number of patients rated ASIA grade E after 90 days of admission, while there was a significant increase in those rated grade D (<i>P</i><0.001). Among the groups, patients operated on within less than 12 h had the highest number of ASIA grade A, while those operated on after more than 48 h had the highest number of ASIA grade E (<i>P</i>=0.003). The survival rate of patients who underwent their first spinal surgery between 12 and 48 h was significantly better than those operated earlier than 12 h or later than 48 h (<i>P</i>=0.047). Patients who experienced hemorrhagic shock postsurgery had the lowest survival rate (<i>P</i><0.001). Only age (<i>P</i>=0.004) and the number of surgeries outside the spine (<i>P</i>=0.033), as covariates, were significantly correlated with patient mortality (R<sup>2</sup>=0.519).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing spinal surgery too early or too late can adversely affect patient outcomes; the appropriate timing of surgery should be chosen based on the specific characteristics of the patient. In polytrauma patients under emergency conditions, the use of combined surgical treatments should be minimized to prevent the occurrence of a 'second hit'. Patients who experience hemorrhagic shock have the worst postsurgical survival; targeted treatment should be administered upon hospital admission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"86 12\",\"pages\":\"6960-6967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623812/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在分析脊髓损伤多发伤患者的诊治情况,明确首次手术的部位、手术时机及影响预后的因素。方法:本研究收集并分析2017年1月至2023年1月收治的脊柱损伤多发伤患者的资料。收集的数据主要包括患者基本信息、治疗策略相关信息、临床评分系统、影像学参数和预后。分析相关变量对术后生存结果的影响。结果:本研究纳入60例患者。入院90天后,ASIA分级为E级的患者数量无显著变化,而分级为D级的患者数量显著增加(PP=0.003)。第一次脊柱手术时间为12 ~ 48 h的患者生存率明显优于早于12 h和晚于48 h的患者(P=0.047)。术后失血性休克患者生存率最低(PP=0.004),脊柱外手术次数(P=0.033)作为协变量与患者死亡率显著相关(R2=0.519)。结论:太早或太晚进行脊柱手术会对患者的预后产生不利影响;应根据患者的具体情况选择合适的手术时机。在紧急情况下的多发创伤患者,应尽量减少联合手术治疗的使用,以防止“二次打击”的发生。失血性休克患者的术后生存率最差;入院时应给予针对性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of factors influencing the surgical treatment outcomes of spinal injuries in polytrauma patients.

Background: This study aims to analyze the diagnosis and treatment conditions of polytrauma patients with spinal injuries, to clarify the site of the first surgical intervention, the timing of the surgery, and factors influencing prognosis.

Methods: This study collected and analyzed data on polytrauma patients with spinal injuries who were treated from January 2017 to January 2023. Data collected primarily included basic patient information, treatment strategy-related information, clinical scoring systems, imaging parameters, and prognosis. The impacts of relevant variables on postoperative survival outcomes were analyzed.

Results: This study included 60 patients. There was no significant change in the number of patients rated ASIA grade E after 90 days of admission, while there was a significant increase in those rated grade D (P<0.001). Among the groups, patients operated on within less than 12 h had the highest number of ASIA grade A, while those operated on after more than 48 h had the highest number of ASIA grade E (P=0.003). The survival rate of patients who underwent their first spinal surgery between 12 and 48 h was significantly better than those operated earlier than 12 h or later than 48 h (P=0.047). Patients who experienced hemorrhagic shock postsurgery had the lowest survival rate (P<0.001). Only age (P=0.004) and the number of surgeries outside the spine (P=0.033), as covariates, were significantly correlated with patient mortality (R2=0.519).

Conclusions: Performing spinal surgery too early or too late can adversely affect patient outcomes; the appropriate timing of surgery should be chosen based on the specific characteristics of the patient. In polytrauma patients under emergency conditions, the use of combined surgical treatments should be minimized to prevent the occurrence of a 'second hit'. Patients who experience hemorrhagic shock have the worst postsurgical survival; targeted treatment should be administered upon hospital admission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
期刊最新文献
Protein-losing enteropathy as the first presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus the first case reported in Palestine with systemic review. Combined coronary artery bypass grafting and orthopedic fixation in a patient with multiple comorbidities: a case report. Precipitate, preterm labor in acute organophosphate poisoning in pregnancy: a case report. Is fascia lata a viable graft for MPFL reconstruction? An overview of surgical technique and scoping literature review. A rare case of left transverse testicular ectopia in an adult.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1